Public Managers in Local Government – Demographic Profile and the Financial Potential of Municipalities, Using the Example of the Olsztyn County
Angelika Chorążewicz
Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztynhttps://orcid.org/0009-0003-0486-7939
Abstract
The main objective of the study was to identify the demographic profile of municipality heads and mayors of Olsztyn County at the beginning of the 2024–2029 term of office and to assess the degree of variation in the financial condition of the local government units under their authority in the years 2020–2024. Using a case study strategy based on data from Statistics Poland and budget reports, changes in selected financial indicators were characterised, and the characteristics of the current leaders were exploratorily compared with the values of the indicators for 2024. Spearman’s rank correlation analysis for age did not reveal statistically significant relationships in the analysed sample (n = 12). Comparisons by gender and education were descriptive in nature and do not provide a basis for inferring the absence or existence of relationships in the population. At the same time, persistent differences were observed between municipalities belonging to the Olsztyn Functional Urban Area and the remaining municipalities of the county. Due to the small sample size, the temporal inconsistency between the period covered by the financial data and the term of office of some of the leaders studied, as well as the nominal nature of the data, the results should be treated as preliminary and exploratory, without causal interpretation.
Keywords:
public manager, municipal self-government, public management, local finance, Olsztyn CountyReferences
Abera Timbula, M., & Marvadi, C. (2024). Leadership styles and employees’ commitment toward the national digital payment strategy: Multilevel mediating role of job satisfaction. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 16(1), 53-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2023.2250548. Google Scholar
Ahmad, A.R., Abdul Rahman, A.G., & Soon, N.K. (2015). The effects of transformational and transactional leadership styles on job satisfaction. Advanced Science Letters, 21(5), 1505-1508. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2015.6087. Google Scholar
Andersen, J.A. (2010). Public versus private managers: How public and private managers differ in leadership behavior. Public Administration Review, 70(1), 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02117.x. Google Scholar
Andersen, L.B., Jacobsen, C.B., Jensen, U.T., & Salomonsen, H.H. (2021). Public managers’ contribution to public service performance. Managing for Public Service Performance. How people and values make a difference, 85-103. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192893420.003.0005. Google Scholar
Anttiroiko, A.V. (2009). Strategic knowledge management in public organizations. In D.B.A. Mehdi Khosrow-Pour (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Second Edition. Hershey: IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-026-4.ch573. Google Scholar
Barzelay, M. (2005). Origins of the new public management: An international view from public administration/political science. In K. McLaughlin, E. Ferlie, S. Osborne (Eds.). New Public Management. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203996362. Google Scholar
Bashkin, O., Otok, R., Kapra, O., Czabanowska, K., Barach, P., Baron-Epel, O., … & Mor, Z. (2022). Identifying the gaps between public health training and practice: A workforce competencies comparative analysis. International Journal of Public Health, 67, 1605303. https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2022.1605303. Google Scholar
Behn, R.D. (1997). Branch Rickey as a public manager: Fulfilling the eight responsibilities of public management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024334. Google Scholar
Berrones, R.U. (2004). El valor institucional de la gestión pública. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 9(28), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.31876/revista.v9i28.9802. Google Scholar
Bertelli, A.M., & Lynn, L.E. (2003). Managerial responsibility. Public Administration Review, 63(3), 259-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00288. Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, S., & Jha, S. (2014). Development of a model relating internal organizational variables with customer orientation in the context of the emerging economy of India. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 6(1), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-04-2013-0034. Google Scholar
BIP. (2026). Retrieved from https://bip.powiat-olsztynski.pl/ (21.04.2026). Google Scholar
Bissessar, A.M. (2023). New Public Management Reform in the Caribbean. In A. Farazmand (Eds.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66252-3_2830. Google Scholar
Bjørnholt, B., Boye, S., & Mikkelsen, M.F. (2022). Balancing managerialism and autonomy: A panel study of the link between managerial autonomy, performance goals, and organizational performance. Public Performance & Management Review, 45(6), 1258-1286. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2048399. Google Scholar
Boyne, G.A. (2004). Explaining public service performance: Does management matter? Public Policy and Administration, 19(4), 100-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/095207670401900406. Google Scholar
Bruno, A. (2018). The “organizing” paradigm in public administration: Learning by focusing on customer orientation. Journal of Workplace Learning, 30(3), 186-198. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-01-2018-0027. Google Scholar
Cáceres, L.S., Porro, A.B.S., Delgado, H.C., & Vega, S.M.G. (2025). Administración pública: campo especializado de la gerencia. Revista de Información científica para la Dirección en Salud. INFODIR, 44. Retrieved from https://revinfodir.sld.cu/index.php/infodir/article/view/1706 (21.04.2026). Google Scholar
Creswell, J.W. (2013). Projektowanie badań naukowych: Metody jakościowe, ilościowe i mieszane. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Google Scholar
Demir, T. (2011). Professionalism, responsiveness, and representation: What do they mean for city managers? International Journal of Public Administration, 34(3), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2010.533066. Google Scholar
DiIulio Jr, J.D. (1998). Recovering the public management variable: Lessons from schools, prisons, and armies. International Journal of Public Administration, 21(6-8), 1147-1168. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900699808525341. Google Scholar
Dopson, S., & Stewart, R. (1990). Public and private sector management: The case for a wider debate. Public Money & Management, 10(1), 37-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540969009387585. Google Scholar
Du, W., Song, Y., Li, Y. (2011). Multiple Perspective of Public Administration Development Strategy of NGOs. In Q. Zhou (Ed.). Advances in Applied Economics, Business and Development. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23020-2_5. Google Scholar
Farrell, M. (2006). Regional integration, regionalism and public administration: Bridging the global-national divide in decision making and policy implementation. In A. Farazmand & J. Pinkowski (Eds.). Handbook of Globalization, Governance, and Public Administration. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/b13629. Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. (2004). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Sosiologisk tidsskrift, 12(2), 117-142. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-2928-2004-02-02. Google Scholar
Giedraitytė, V., & Smaliukienė, R. (2024). An application of creative problem-solving approach in forming public management competencies. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(1), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(1).2024.02. Google Scholar
GUS. (2024). Finanse Publiczne. Retrieved from https://bdl.stat.gov.pl/bdl/dane/podgrup/temat (21.04.2026). Google Scholar
GUS. (2026). Retrieved from https://sdg.gov.pl/en/statistics_glob/5-5-1/ (8.08.2026). Google Scholar
Guy, M.E., & Meier, K.J. (2016). Women and Men of the States: Public Administrators and the State Level. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315486734. Google Scholar
Haque, M.S. (2013). Rethinking Democratic Governance: Looking Back, Moving Forward. In G. Mudacumura & G. Morçöl (Eds.). Challenges to Democratic Governance in Developing Countries. Public Administration, Governance and Globalization. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03143-9_17. Google Scholar
Hood, C. (2007). Public management: The word, the movement, the science. In E. Ferlie, L.E. Lynn, & C. Pollitt (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Public Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199226443.003.0002. Google Scholar
Hughes, O. (2017). Public management: 30 years on. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(6-7), 547-554. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2017-0174. Google Scholar
Iddrisu, I., & Mohammed, B. (2025). Exploring the impact of leadership styles on organizational effectiveness: The mediating role of employee motivation and engagement. Public Organization Review, 25(3), 1111-1133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-025-00845-w. Google Scholar
Kellough, J.E. (1999). Reinventing public personnel management: Ethical implications for managers and public personnel systems. Public Personnel Management, 28(4), 655-671. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102609902800411. Google Scholar
Kotze, M., & Venter, I. (2011). Differences in emotional intelligence between effective and ineffective leaders in the public sector: An empirical study. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2), 397-427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311399857. Google Scholar
Lau, A.W., & Pavett, C.M. (1980). The nature of managerial work: A comparison of public-and private-sector managers. Group & Organization Studies, 5(4), 453-466. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960118000500406. Google Scholar
Lee, H.J. (2018). How emotional intelligence relates to job satisfaction and burnout in public service jobs. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(4), 729-745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852316670489. Google Scholar
Leisink, P., Andersen, L.B., Jacobsen, C.B., Knies, E., Brewer, G.A., & Vandenabeele, W. (2021). Conclusion: Directions for future research and practice. In P. Leisink, L.B. Andersen, G.A. Brewer, C.B. Jacobsen, E. Knies, & W. Vandenabeele (Eds.). Managing for Public Service Performance: How People and Values Make a Difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192893420.003.0016. Google Scholar
Liddle, J. (2017). Public value management and new public governance: Key traits, issues and developments. In E. Ongaro, & S. Van Thiel (Eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_49. Google Scholar
Lorusso, S. (2021). Gestione delle aziende pubbliche: dal” principe” al valore pubblico. Economia Pubblica, 3. https://doi.org/10.3280/EP2021-003002. Google Scholar
Matjie, T. (2018). The relationship between the leadership effectiveness and emotional competence of managers in the public sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(15), 1271-1278. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1387140. Google Scholar
McNutt, J.G., & Ban, C.C. (2023). Preparing public managers to deal with disruptive innovations through citizen partnerships. In S.B. Edwards III, & J.R. Masterson (Eds.). Government Response to Disruptive Innovation: Perspectives and Examinations. Hershey: IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6429-8.ch001. Google Scholar
Pierre, J., & Painter, M. (2010). Why legality cannot be contracted out: Exploring the limits of new public management. In M. Ramesh, E. Araral Jr., & X. Wu (Eds.). Reasserting the Public in Public Services: New Public Management Reforms. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203858523. Google Scholar
PKW. (2026). Retrieved from https://pkw.gov.pl/wybory-i-referenda (21.04.2026). Google Scholar
Plotnikof, M. (2016). Changing market values? Tensions of contradicting public management discourses: A case from the Danish daycare sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(7), 659-674. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-02-2016-0027. Google Scholar
Popęda, P., & Hadasik, B. (2024). New Public Governance as a new wave of the public policy: Theoretical approach and conceptualization of the trend. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 13(1), 18-36. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEPP-09-2023-0089. Google Scholar
Przybylska, I. (2016). Emotional intelligence and burnout in the teaching profession. The New Educational Review, 43, 41-52. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2016.43.1.03. Google Scholar
Reis, I., Fedoryshena, A., Farinha, J., Santos, V., & Martinho, F. (2026). Leadership Styles and Their Impact on Motivation and Employee Engagement. In B. Alareeni (Ed.). Technology and Entrepreneurship: Systems Driving Innovation. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-99466-1_36. Google Scholar
Rennison, B.W. (2007). Historical discourses of public management in Denmark: Past emergence and present challenge. Management & Organizational History, 2(1), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744935907076347. Google Scholar
Saputra, N., Putera, R.E., Zetra, A., Azwar, Valentina, T.R., & Mulia, R.A. (2024). Capacity building for organizational performance: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2434966. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2434966. Google Scholar
Song, M., An, S.H., & Meier, K.J. (2021). Quality standards, implementation autonomy, and citizen satisfaction with public services: Cross-national evidence. Public Management Review, 23(6), 906-928. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1730939. Google Scholar
Uster, A., & Vinarski-Peretz, H. (2026). Factors affecting chief executive officers’ managerial autonomy in municipally owned corporations: A qualitative study. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 92(1), 141-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523251369314. Google Scholar
Verhoest, K., Verschuere, B., Meyers, F., & Sulle, A. (2010). Performance of public sector organizations: Do managerial tools matter? In P. Lægreid, & K. Verhoest (Eds.). Governance of Public Sector Organizations: Proliferation, Autonomy and Performance. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230290600_11. Google Scholar
Wynen, J., & Verhoest, K. (2015). Do NPM-type reforms lead to a cultural revolution within public sector organizations? Public Management Review, 17(3), 356-379. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841459. Google Scholar
Yin, R.K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar
Zahra, A., & Jadoon, M.Z.I. (2016). Autonomy of public agencies in Pakistan: Does structure matter? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(6), 565-581. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-02-2015-0019. Google Scholar
Zapico-Goñi, E. (2017). Adapting Evaluation and Accountability Systems to Public Management Contexts. In M. Dubnick, & H.G. Frederickson (Eds.). Making Accountability Work: Dilemmas for Evaluation and for Audit. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203786666. Google Scholar
Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0486-7939
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
An Author declares that his paper has not been published before (under the same or another title, or is a part of another publication) and does not infringe copyrights of other persons**. At the same time, the Author transfers to the Publisher the exclusive right to publish and to circulate this work in print in the form of a non-serial journal publication and in a form of an electronic publication.
The journal is available on Creative Common license CC-BY-NC-ND
