Menedżer publiczny w samorządzie gminnym – profil demograficzny a potencjał finansowy gmin na przykładzie powiatu olsztyńskiego
Angelika Chorążewicz
Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych, Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztyniehttps://orcid.org/0009-0003-0486-7939
Abstrakt
Głównym celem badań było rozpoznanie profilu demograficznego wójtów i burmistrzów powiatu olsztyńskiego na początku kadencji 2024–2029 oraz ocena stopnia zróżnicowania kondycji finansowej podległych im jednostek samorządu terytorialnego w latach 2020–2024. Wykorzystując strategię studium przypadku opartego na danych GUS i sprawozdaniach budżetowych, scharakteryzowano zmiany wybranych wskaźników finansowych oraz eksploracyjnie zestawiono cechy obecnych liderów z wartościami wskaźników za 2024 r. Analiza korelacji rang Spearmana dla wieku nie wykazała statystycznie istotnych współzależności w badanej próbie (n = 12). Porównania według płci i wykształcenia miały charakter opisowy i nie stanowią podstawy do wnioskowania o braku lub istnieniu zależności w populacji. Zaobserwowano jednocześnie utrzymujące się różnice między gminami należącymi do Miejskiego Obszaru Funkcjonalnego Olsztyna a pozostałymi gminami powiatu. Ze względu na małą próbę, niespójność czasową między okresem danych finansowych a kadencją części badanych liderów oraz nominalny charakter danych wyniki należy traktować jako wstępne i eksploracyjne, bez interpretacji przyczynowej.
Słowa kluczowe:
menedżer publiczny, samorząd gminny, zarządzanie publiczne, finanse lokalne, powiat olsztyńskiBibliografia
Abera Timbula, M., & Marvadi, C. (2024). Leadership styles and employees’ commitment toward the national digital payment strategy: Multilevel mediating role of job satisfaction. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 16(1), 53-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2023.2250548. Google Scholar
Ahmad, A.R., Abdul Rahman, A.G., & Soon, N.K. (2015). The effects of transformational and transactional leadership styles on job satisfaction. Advanced Science Letters, 21(5), 1505-1508. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2015.6087. Google Scholar
Andersen, J.A. (2010). Public versus private managers: How public and private managers differ in leadership behavior. Public Administration Review, 70(1), 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02117.x. Google Scholar
Andersen, L.B., Jacobsen, C.B., Jensen, U.T., & Salomonsen, H.H. (2021). Public managers’ contribution to public service performance. Managing for Public Service Performance. How people and values make a difference, 85-103. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192893420.003.0005. Google Scholar
Anttiroiko, A.V. (2009). Strategic knowledge management in public organizations. In D.B.A. Mehdi Khosrow-Pour (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Second Edition. Hershey: IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-026-4.ch573. Google Scholar
Barzelay, M. (2005). Origins of the new public management: An international view from public administration/political science. In K. McLaughlin, E. Ferlie, S. Osborne (Eds.). New Public Management. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203996362. Google Scholar
Bashkin, O., Otok, R., Kapra, O., Czabanowska, K., Barach, P., Baron-Epel, O., … & Mor, Z. (2022). Identifying the gaps between public health training and practice: A workforce competencies comparative analysis. International Journal of Public Health, 67, 1605303. https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2022.1605303. Google Scholar
Behn, R.D. (1997). Branch Rickey as a public manager: Fulfilling the eight responsibilities of public management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024334. Google Scholar
Berrones, R.U. (2004). El valor institucional de la gestión pública. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 9(28), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.31876/revista.v9i28.9802. Google Scholar
Bertelli, A.M., & Lynn, L.E. (2003). Managerial responsibility. Public Administration Review, 63(3), 259-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00288. Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, S., & Jha, S. (2014). Development of a model relating internal organizational variables with customer orientation in the context of the emerging economy of India. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 6(1), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-04-2013-0034. Google Scholar
BIP. (2026). Retrieved from https://bip.powiat-olsztynski.pl/ (21.04.2026). Google Scholar
Bissessar, A.M. (2023). New Public Management Reform in the Caribbean. In A. Farazmand (Eds.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66252-3_2830. Google Scholar
Bjørnholt, B., Boye, S., & Mikkelsen, M.F. (2022). Balancing managerialism and autonomy: A panel study of the link between managerial autonomy, performance goals, and organizational performance. Public Performance & Management Review, 45(6), 1258-1286. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2048399. Google Scholar
Boyne, G.A. (2004). Explaining public service performance: Does management matter? Public Policy and Administration, 19(4), 100-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/095207670401900406. Google Scholar
Bruno, A. (2018). The “organizing” paradigm in public administration: Learning by focusing on customer orientation. Journal of Workplace Learning, 30(3), 186-198. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-01-2018-0027. Google Scholar
Cáceres, L.S., Porro, A.B.S., Delgado, H.C., & Vega, S.M.G. (2025). Administración pública: campo especializado de la gerencia. Revista de Información científica para la Dirección en Salud. INFODIR, 44. Retrieved from https://revinfodir.sld.cu/index.php/infodir/article/view/1706 (21.04.2026). Google Scholar
Creswell, J.W. (2013). Projektowanie badań naukowych: Metody jakościowe, ilościowe i mieszane. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Google Scholar
Demir, T. (2011). Professionalism, responsiveness, and representation: What do they mean for city managers? International Journal of Public Administration, 34(3), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2010.533066. Google Scholar
DiIulio Jr, J.D. (1998). Recovering the public management variable: Lessons from schools, prisons, and armies. International Journal of Public Administration, 21(6-8), 1147-1168. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900699808525341. Google Scholar
Dopson, S., & Stewart, R. (1990). Public and private sector management: The case for a wider debate. Public Money & Management, 10(1), 37-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540969009387585. Google Scholar
Du, W., Song, Y., Li, Y. (2011). Multiple Perspective of Public Administration Development Strategy of NGOs. In Q. Zhou (Ed.). Advances in Applied Economics, Business and Development. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23020-2_5. Google Scholar
Farrell, M. (2006). Regional integration, regionalism and public administration: Bridging the global-national divide in decision making and policy implementation. In A. Farazmand & J. Pinkowski (Eds.). Handbook of Globalization, Governance, and Public Administration. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/b13629. Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. (2004). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Sosiologisk tidsskrift, 12(2), 117-142. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-2928-2004-02-02. Google Scholar
Giedraitytė, V., & Smaliukienė, R. (2024). An application of creative problem-solving approach in forming public management competencies. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(1), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(1).2024.02. Google Scholar
GUS. (2024). Finanse Publiczne. Retrieved from https://bdl.stat.gov.pl/bdl/dane/podgrup/temat (21.04.2026). Google Scholar
GUS. (2026). Retrieved from https://sdg.gov.pl/en/statistics_glob/5-5-1/ (8.08.2026). Google Scholar
Guy, M.E., & Meier, K.J. (2016). Women and Men of the States: Public Administrators and the State Level. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315486734. Google Scholar
Haque, M.S. (2013). Rethinking Democratic Governance: Looking Back, Moving Forward. In G. Mudacumura & G. Morçöl (Eds.). Challenges to Democratic Governance in Developing Countries. Public Administration, Governance and Globalization. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03143-9_17. Google Scholar
Hood, C. (2007). Public management: The word, the movement, the science. In E. Ferlie, L.E. Lynn, & C. Pollitt (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Public Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199226443.003.0002. Google Scholar
Hughes, O. (2017). Public management: 30 years on. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(6-7), 547-554. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2017-0174. Google Scholar
Iddrisu, I., & Mohammed, B. (2025). Exploring the impact of leadership styles on organizational effectiveness: The mediating role of employee motivation and engagement. Public Organization Review, 25(3), 1111-1133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-025-00845-w. Google Scholar
Kellough, J.E. (1999). Reinventing public personnel management: Ethical implications for managers and public personnel systems. Public Personnel Management, 28(4), 655-671. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102609902800411. Google Scholar
Kotze, M., & Venter, I. (2011). Differences in emotional intelligence between effective and ineffective leaders in the public sector: An empirical study. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2), 397-427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311399857. Google Scholar
Lau, A.W., & Pavett, C.M. (1980). The nature of managerial work: A comparison of public-and private-sector managers. Group & Organization Studies, 5(4), 453-466. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960118000500406. Google Scholar
Lee, H.J. (2018). How emotional intelligence relates to job satisfaction and burnout in public service jobs. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(4), 729-745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852316670489. Google Scholar
Leisink, P., Andersen, L.B., Jacobsen, C.B., Knies, E., Brewer, G.A., & Vandenabeele, W. (2021). Conclusion: Directions for future research and practice. In P. Leisink, L.B. Andersen, G.A. Brewer, C.B. Jacobsen, E. Knies, & W. Vandenabeele (Eds.). Managing for Public Service Performance: How People and Values Make a Difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192893420.003.0016. Google Scholar
Liddle, J. (2017). Public value management and new public governance: Key traits, issues and developments. In E. Ongaro, & S. Van Thiel (Eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_49. Google Scholar
Lorusso, S. (2021). Gestione delle aziende pubbliche: dal” principe” al valore pubblico. Economia Pubblica, 3. https://doi.org/10.3280/EP2021-003002. Google Scholar
Matjie, T. (2018). The relationship between the leadership effectiveness and emotional competence of managers in the public sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(15), 1271-1278. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1387140. Google Scholar
McNutt, J.G., & Ban, C.C. (2023). Preparing public managers to deal with disruptive innovations through citizen partnerships. In S.B. Edwards III, & J.R. Masterson (Eds.). Government Response to Disruptive Innovation: Perspectives and Examinations. Hershey: IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6429-8.ch001. Google Scholar
Pierre, J., & Painter, M. (2010). Why legality cannot be contracted out: Exploring the limits of new public management. In M. Ramesh, E. Araral Jr., & X. Wu (Eds.). Reasserting the Public in Public Services: New Public Management Reforms. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203858523. Google Scholar
PKW. (2026). Retrieved from https://pkw.gov.pl/wybory-i-referenda (21.04.2026). Google Scholar
Plotnikof, M. (2016). Changing market values? Tensions of contradicting public management discourses: A case from the Danish daycare sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(7), 659-674. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-02-2016-0027. Google Scholar
Popęda, P., & Hadasik, B. (2024). New Public Governance as a new wave of the public policy: Theoretical approach and conceptualization of the trend. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 13(1), 18-36. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEPP-09-2023-0089. Google Scholar
Przybylska, I. (2016). Emotional intelligence and burnout in the teaching profession. The New Educational Review, 43, 41-52. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2016.43.1.03. Google Scholar
Reis, I., Fedoryshena, A., Farinha, J., Santos, V., & Martinho, F. (2026). Leadership Styles and Their Impact on Motivation and Employee Engagement. In B. Alareeni (Ed.). Technology and Entrepreneurship: Systems Driving Innovation. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-99466-1_36. Google Scholar
Rennison, B.W. (2007). Historical discourses of public management in Denmark: Past emergence and present challenge. Management & Organizational History, 2(1), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744935907076347. Google Scholar
Saputra, N., Putera, R.E., Zetra, A., Azwar, Valentina, T.R., & Mulia, R.A. (2024). Capacity building for organizational performance: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2434966. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2434966. Google Scholar
Song, M., An, S.H., & Meier, K.J. (2021). Quality standards, implementation autonomy, and citizen satisfaction with public services: Cross-national evidence. Public Management Review, 23(6), 906-928. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1730939. Google Scholar
Uster, A., & Vinarski-Peretz, H. (2026). Factors affecting chief executive officers’ managerial autonomy in municipally owned corporations: A qualitative study. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 92(1), 141-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523251369314. Google Scholar
Verhoest, K., Verschuere, B., Meyers, F., & Sulle, A. (2010). Performance of public sector organizations: Do managerial tools matter? In P. Lægreid, & K. Verhoest (Eds.). Governance of Public Sector Organizations: Proliferation, Autonomy and Performance. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230290600_11. Google Scholar
Wynen, J., & Verhoest, K. (2015). Do NPM-type reforms lead to a cultural revolution within public sector organizations? Public Management Review, 17(3), 356-379. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841459. Google Scholar
Yin, R.K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar
Zahra, A., & Jadoon, M.Z.I. (2016). Autonomy of public agencies in Pakistan: Does structure matter? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(6), 565-581. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-02-2015-0019. Google Scholar
Zapico-Goñi, E. (2017). Adapting Evaluation and Accountability Systems to Public Management Contexts. In M. Dubnick, & H.G. Frederickson (Eds.). Making Accountability Work: Dilemmas for Evaluation and for Audit. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203786666. Google Scholar
Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych, Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0486-7939
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Każdy Autor składa oświadczenie, że praca nie była wcześniej publikowana (pod tym samym lub innym tytułem, nie stanowi również części innej publikacji) oraz nie narusza praw autorskich innych osób. Jednocześnie Autor przenosi na wydawcę wyłączne prawo wydania i rozpowszechniania tego utworu drukiem w formie zwartej publikacji czasopisma oraz w formie publikacji elektronicznej.
Czasopismo udostępnione jest na licencji Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND
