ROZBIEŻNOŚĆ OCEN W GRUPOWYM PODEJMOWANIU DECYZJI  JAKO ISTOTNA INFORMACJA W ROZSTRZYGANIU KONFLIKTÓW PRZESTRZENNYCH

Joanna Jaroszewicz

doi:10.31648/aspal.457

Published: 2017-09-301

Vol. 16 No. 3 (2017)

DISCREPANCY OF ASSESSMENTS IN GROUP DECISION MAKING AS IMPORTANT INFORMATION IN SOLVING SPATIAL CONFLICTS

Joanna Jaroszewicz

Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.31648/aspal.457

Abstract

Making spatial decisions related to the allocation of management functions is associated with the issue of solving spatial conflicts. The determination of usefulness of land for a land use function applies geographic information systems and methods of multi-criteria analysis. The analysis process increasingly frequently involves groups of participants playing different roles in the decision making process and having different goals. The discrepancy of assessments of particular members of the group can be analyzed, and measures of discrepancy can be determined. The maps of usefulness of land determined by multi-criteria analysis constitute input data for the analysis of multi-goal allocation of land function. In geographic information systems, solving the issue of land allocation frequently applies heuristic methods using various approaches to the occurring spatial conflict. This article describes the developed analysis procedure, in which it was assumed that the spatial measure of discrepancy of assessments of decision-makers is an important factor which should be considered in solving spatial conflicts.

Keywords:

Land use allocation, analysis process, AHP, heuristic algorithm, results uncertainty

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Jaroszewicz, J. (2017). DISCREPANCY OF ASSESSMENTS IN GROUP DECISION MAKING AS IMPORTANT INFORMATION IN SOLVING SPATIAL CONFLICTS. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum, 16(3), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.31648/aspal.457

Cited by / Share

References

Arendarski, J. (2013). Niepewność pomiarów (Uncertainty of measurements). Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej.
Benjamin, C., O., Ehie, I., C., Omurtag, Y. (1992). Planning facilities at the University of Missouri-Rolla. Interfaces 22(4), 95–105.
Bielska, A., Kupidura, A., Rogoziński, P. (2012). Analiza warunków glebowych w planowaniu i zagospodarowaniu przestrzennym na obszarach wiejskich (Analysis of soil conditions in spatial planning in rural areas). Acta Sci. Pol. Administratio Locorum 11(1), 29–36.
Biłozor, A., Czyża, S., Szuniewicz, K. (2013). Wykorzystanie algorytmów genetycznych do prognozowania stanów przestrzeni miejskiej w procesie proaktywnego przeciwdziałania zagrożeniom (Use of genetic algorithms to forecasting the united urban space in the process of threats against proactive). Acta Sci. Pol.
Administratio Locorum 12(1), 31–43.
Blachowski, J., Rybakiewicz, W., Warczewski, W., Malczewski, P. (2016). Zastosowanie analiz wielokryterialnych w GIS do optymalizacji planowania obszarów zabudowy mieszkaniowej na przykładzie Wrocławskiego Obszaru Funkcjonalnego (Application of multi-criteria analysis in GIS for optimal planning of house development areas. Case study of Wrocław Functional Area). Roczniki Geomatyki. Annals of Geomatics. Polskie Towarzystwo Informacji Przestrzennej t. 14, z. 5(75), 561–571.
Brookes, C., J. (1997a). A parameterized region-growing programme for site allocation on raster suitability maps. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 11(4), 375–396.
Carr, M., H., Zwick, P., D. (2007). Smart land-use analysis. The LUCIS model: land-use conflict identification strategy. ESRI Press.
Chmielewski, J., M. (2002). Konflikty w zagospodarowaniu przestrzennym (Conflicts in spatial planning). Studia Regionalne i Lokalne 1, 115–121.
Church, R., L., Gerrard, R., A., Gilpin, M., Stine, P.
(2003). Constructing cell-based habitat patches use-
ful in conservation planning. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93(4), 814–827.
Eastman, J., R., Jin, W., Kyem, P., A., K., Toledano, J. (1995). Raster procedures for multi-criteria/ multi-objective decisions. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 61, 539–47.
Hindsworth, M., F., Lang, T., B. (2009). Community participation and empowerment. Hauppauge, Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
Jankowski, P., Nyerges, T. (2001a). Geographic information systems for group decision making. Towards a participatory geographic information science. Taylor & Francis, London.
Jankowski, P., Nyerges, T. (2001b). GIS-supported collaborative decision-making. Results of an experiment. Annals of Association of American Geographers 91(1) , 48–70.
Jaroszewicz, J., Bielska, A., Szafranek, A. (2012). Wykorzystanie algebry map dla wyznaczenia terenów przydatnych pod zabudowę (Application of map algebra to determine the lands preferred for building development). Archiwum Fotogrametrii, Kartografii i Teledetekcji 23, 127–137.
Keeney, R., L. (1992). Value-focused thinking. A path to creative decision making. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Lingman-Zielinska, A., Jankowski, P. (2014). Spatially-explicit integrated uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of criteria weights in multicriteria land suitability evaluation. Environmental Modelling and Software 57 , 235–248..
Malczewski, J. (2006). GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis. A survey of the literature. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 20(7), 703–726.
Malczewski, J., Rinner, C. (2015). Multicriteria decision analysis in geographic information science. Springer.
Massam, B., H. (1988). Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques in planning. Progress in Planning 30(1), 1–84.
Miejscowy plan zagospodarowania przestrzennego części miejscowości Dębe Wielkie w gminie Dębe Wielkie – projekt planu (Local zoning plan of the Dębe Wielkie village in the Dębe Wielkie municipality of – project of plan). (2016). Biuro Planowania i Rozwoju Warszawy S.A., https://debewielkie.e-biuletyn. pl/index.php?id=1521, dostęp: 15.03.2017.
Moeinaddini, M., Khorasani, N., Danehkar, A., Darvishsefat, A., A., Zienalyan, M. (2010). Siting MSW land fill using weighted linear combination and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methodology in GIS environment (case study: Karaj). Waste Management 30(5), 912–920.
Nekhay, O., Arriaza, M., Boerboom, L. (2009). Evaluation of soil erosion risk using analytic network process and GIS. A case study from Spanish mountain olive plantations. Journal of Environmental Management 90(10), 3091–3104.
Nowak-Rząsa, M. (2011) Rola partycypacji społecznej w kształtowaniu terenów zieleni miasta (The role of social participation in the planning and management of urban green areas). Acta Acta Sci. Pol., Administratio Locorum 10(3), 49–54.
Pawłowska, K. (2012). Partycypacja społeczna w podejmowaniu decyzji dotyczących przyrody w mieście (Social participation in decision making about natural environment in the city) Zrównoważony Rozwój — Zastosowania 3, 51–72.
Renigier-Biłozor, M., Biłozor, A. (2013). Opracowanie systemu wspomagania podejmowania decyzji z wykorzystaniem teorii zbiorów rozmytych oraz teorii zbiorów przybliżonych w procesie kształtowania bezpieczeństwa przestrzeni (Elaboration of decision support system using fuzzy set theory and rough set theory in the development of the land security). Acta Sci. Pol. Administratio Locorum 12(1), 67–77.
Saaty, T., L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Saaty, T., L. (1994). How to make a decision. The analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 24(6), 19–43.
Schmoldt, D., L., Peterson, D., L., Smith, R., L. (1994). The analytic hierarchy process and participatory decision making, w: (in:) Proceedings of the 17th Annual Geographic Information Seminar on Decision Support – 2001. Eds. J., M., Power, M., Strome, vol. 1. Toronto, Ontario, September 12–16.
Sobolewska-Mikulska, K., Krupowicz, W. (2016). Concept of the multicriteria model of spatial analysis as support of space development in rural areas. Infrastruktura i Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich IV(3), 1645–1660.
Strager, M., P., Rosenberger, R., S. (2006). Incorporating stakeholder preferences for land conservation. Weights and measures in spatial MCA. Ecological Economics 58(1), 79–92.
Telega, A., Bieda, A. (2015) Analizy stopnia dopasowania sposobu użytkowania ziemi jako narzędzie zarządzania konfliktami przestrzennymi (Land-use suitability analysis as a tool for spatial conflicts management). Infrastruktura i Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich 4(1), 1007–1020. Google Scholar