Court proceedings in cases regarding ascertaining acquisitive prescription of real estate

Paweł Marcin Nowotko

doi:10.31648/aspal.5655

Published: 2020-11-101

Vol. 19 No. 4 (2020)

Court proceedings in cases regarding ascertaining acquisitive prescription of real estate

Paweł Marcin Nowotko

Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.31648/aspal.5655

Abstract

In the article, the author presents the characteristics of the proceedings for ascertaining acquisitive prescription of real estate. Acquisitive prescription is a way to gain property rights. The legislator established non-litigious proceedings in this respect, and at the same time regulated its differences only to a very narrow extent. In this study, the author attempts to comprehensively characterize the proceedings by interpreting legal provisions, discussing views of doctrine and jurisprudence and their critical analysis. The study discusses both the issues of subjects of proceedings as well as the dynamics of proceedings and the characteristics of judgments issued in them. Of particular importance are issues that give rise to doubts, such as the circle of subjects interested in the case, references to the provisions regarding the confirmation of the acquisition of an inheritance and the problem of not binding the court with an application request.

Keywords:

civil proceedings, property law, non-litigious proceedings, acquisition of property

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Nowotko, P. M. (2020). Court proceedings in cases regarding ascertaining acquisitive prescription of real estate. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.31648/aspal.5655

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Akińcza, J. (2006). Zakres podmiotowy uczestników w postępowaniu o zasiedzenie – ochrona praw zainteresowanego w nieprocesie (The subjective scope of the participants in the usucaption proceedings – the protection of the rights of the person concerned in a non-process). Monitor Prawniczy 7, 392.
Google Scholar

Decision of the Supreme Court of 18 February 2015, I CSK 82/14, Legalis no. 1242081.
Google Scholar

Decision of the Supreme Court of 12 September 2014, I CSk 626/13, Legalis no. 1092028.
Google Scholar

Decision of the Supreme Court of 20 March 2014, II CSK 279/13 Legalis no. 994512.
Google Scholar

Decision of the Supreme Court of 26 February 2014, I CSK 243/13 Legalis no. 1160414.
Google Scholar

Decision of the Supreme Court of 27 March 2013, V CSK 202/12, Legalis no. 736743.
Google Scholar

Decision of the Supreme Court of 15 September 2011, II CSK 657/10, Legalis no. 459005.
Google Scholar

Decision of the Supreme Court of 18 November 2003, II CK 233/02, Legalis no. 222833.
Google Scholar

Decision of the Supreme Court of 3 April 2003, V CK 60/03, Legalis no. 59202.
Google Scholar

Decision of the Supreme Court of 3 April 2003, V CKN 60/03, Legalis no. 69807.
Google Scholar

Decision of the Supreme Court of 30 January 2000, I CKN 1359/00, no. Legalis 277317.
Google Scholar

Decision of the Supreme Court of 5 October 1971, III CRN 271/71, Legalis no. 15719.
Google Scholar

Decision of the Supreme Court of 19 February 1966, II CZ 50/66, Legalis no. 12583.
Google Scholar

Decision of the Supreme Court of 5 March 1996, II CRN 211/95, no. Legalis 386463.
Google Scholar

Dziczek, R. (2011). 2.10. Skutki postanowienia o zasiedzeniu, in: Postępowania cywilne w sprawach dotyczących nieruchomości (2.10. The results of a decision on usucaption, in: The civil proceedings in cases regarding real estate). Warszawa. Wydawnictwo Prawnicze LexisNexis.
Google Scholar

Flaga-Gieruszyńska, K. (2019a). Art. 609 KPC, in: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz (The civil procedure code. The commentary). Eds. A., Zieliński, K., Flaga-Gieruszyńska. Legalis, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Flaga-Gieruszyńska, K. (2019a). Art. 610 KPC, in: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz (The civil procedure code. The commentary). Eds. A., Zieliński, K., Flaga-Gieruszyńska. Legalis, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Garlińska, K. (2017). Stwierdzenie zasiedzenia własności nieruchomości – glosa – III CZP 112/14 (The ascertainment of real estate ownership by acquisitive prescription – gloss – III CZP 112/14). Nieruchomości 8, 9–11.
Google Scholar

Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Warsaw of 10 June 2015, VI ACa 37/15, Legalis no. 1337295.
Google Scholar

Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of 25 March 1999, I SA 1306/98, unpublished.
Google Scholar

Krej, N. (2020). Art. 609 KPC, in: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz (The civil procedure code. The commentary). Ed. E., Marszałkowska-Krześ. Legalis, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Malczyk, M. (2020). Art. 609 KPC, in: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Tom I B. Komentarz. Art. 425–729 (The civil procedure code. Volume I B. The commentary. Art. 425–729). Ed. A., Góra-Błaszczykowska. Legalis, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Olczak-Dąbrowska, D. (2019). Art. 609 KPC, in: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz. Art. 506–1217. Tom II (The civil procedure code. The commentary. Art. 506–1217. Volume II). Ed. T., Szanciło. Legalis, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Pietrzykowski, J., Pietrzykowski, K. (2020a). Art. 609 KPC, in: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Tom III. Komentarz. Art. 425–729 (The civil procedure code. The commentary. Volume III. Art. 425–729). Ed. A., Marciniak. Legalis, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Pietrzykowski, J., Pietrzykowski, K. (2020b). Art. 610 KPC, in: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Tom III. Komentarz. Art. 425–729 (The civil procedure code. The commentary. Volume III. Art. 425–729). Eds. A. Marciniak. Legalis, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Rejdak, M. (2020). Art. 510 KPC, in: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Tom III. Komentarz. Art. 425–729 (The civil procedure code. The commentary. Volume III. Art. 425–729). Ed. A. Marciniak. Legalis, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Resolution of the Supreme Court of 11 June 2015, CZP 112/14, Legalis no. 1249407.
Google Scholar

Resolution of the Supreme Court of 11 December 2014, III CZP 94/14, Legalis no. 1180280.
Google Scholar

Resolution of the Supreme Court of 12 March 2003, III CZP 97/02, Legalis no. 56169.
Google Scholar

Resolution of the Supreme Court of 12 June 1986, III CZP 28/86, Legalis no. 25360.
Google Scholar

Resolution of the Supreme Court of 28 February 1978, III CZP 7/78, Legalis no. 20714.
Google Scholar

Resolution of the Supreme Court of 18 December 1974, III CZP 88/74, Legalis no. 18462.
Google Scholar

Resolution of the Supreme Court of 20 March 1969, III CZ 11/69, Legalis no. 13899.
Google Scholar

Resolution of the Supreme Court of 13 September 1967, III CZP 60/67, Legalis no. 13200.
Google Scholar

Siedlecki, W. (1988). Postępowania nieprocesowe (Non-litigation proceedings). Warszawa, PWN.
Google Scholar

Strzelczyk, R. (2019). Rozdział 4. Przemilczenie i zasiedzenie. § 11. Zasiedzenie, in: Prawo nieruchomości (Chapter 4. Concealment and usucaption. § 11. Usucaption, in: Real estate law). Ed. R. Strzelczyk. C.H. Beck, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Studzińska, J. (2017). 13.2.1. Legitymacja do złożenia wniosku o stwierdzenie zasiedzenia i uczestnicy postępowania, in: Postępowanie nieprocesowe (13.2.1. The right of action to file a motion for the ascertainment of usucaption and the participants of the proceedings, in: Non-litigation proceedings). Eds. E., Gapska, J., Studzińska. Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Ustawa z 17 listopada 1964 r. Kodeks postępowania cywilnego (The Code of Civil Procedure of 17 November 1964). Dz.U. 2019 item 1460.
Google Scholar

Ustawa z dnia 23 kwietnia 1964 r. Kodeks cywilny (Civil Code of 23 April 1964). Dz.U. 2019 item 1145.
Google Scholar

Ustawa z dnia 25 lutego 1964 r. Kodeks rodzinny i opiekuńczy (The Family and Guardianship Code of 25 February 1964). Dz.U. 2019 item 2086.
Google Scholar

Ustawa z dnia 28 lipca 2005 r. o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych (Law on Court Costs in Civil Cases of 28 July 2015). Dz.U. 2020 item 755.
Google Scholar

Wagemann, M. (2011). Postępowanie sądowe w sprawach o zasiedzenie (The court proceedings in cases regarding usucaption). Nieruchomości 7, 10–13.
Google Scholar