Incapacitation and real estate trading. A case study

Katarzyna Bagan-Kurluta; Krzysztof Michalak

doi:10.31648/aspal.9137

Published: 2023-09-171

Vol. 22 No. 3 (2023)

Incapacitation and real estate trading. A case study

Katarzyna Bagan-Kurluta , Krzysztof Michalak

Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.31648/aspal.9137

Abstract

Motives: Incapacitation is presented in the literature as an important legal device for protecting the rights of the persons concerned. At the same time, in some cases (such as legal transactions with foreign countries), the legal consequences of incapacitation seem to be disproportionate to the protected interests. This overview aims to present a short case study that highlights the differences in the interests, possible views and demands of the parties in transactions involving real estate owned by incapacitated persons.

Aim: To initiate a debate on the degree of necessary legal protection in transactions involving real estate owned by incapacitated persons, and to analyze in a discursive manner the jurisdictional, procedural, and socioeconomic dimensions of a single problem in a short case study.

Results: Depending on the context, incapacitation can be both a form of protection and a difficulty in particular civil cases involving parties with limitations or residing in different jurisdictions.

Keywords:

incapacitation, custody, real estate, legal representation, efficiency of civil proceedings

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Anna Klimach, Katarzyna Bagan-Kurluta, Installation of transmission facilities on lands covered with flowing surface water – the Polish example , Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum: Vol. 21 No. 2 (2022)

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Bagan-Kurluta, K., & Michalak, K. (2023). Incapacitation and real estate trading. A case study. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum, 22(3), 311–319. https://doi.org/10.31648/aspal.9137

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Act of February 25, 1964. Family and Guardianship Code (Journal of Laws 1964 No. 9 item 59, as amended).
Google Scholar

Act of April 23, 1964. Civil Code (Uniform text: Journal of Laws of 2022, item 1360, as amended).
Google Scholar

Act of November 17, 1964. Code of Civil Procedure (i.e. Journal of Laws of 2021, item 1805, as amended).
Google Scholar

Act of February 4, 2011. Private International Law (i.e. Journal of Laws of 2023, item 503).
Google Scholar

Bagan-Kurluta, K. [in:] M. Załucki (Ed.). (2023). Komen¬tarz do Kodeksu Cywilnego [Commentary on the Civil Code], art. 27, Legalis.
Google Scholar

Decision of the Supreme Administrative Court of Febru¬ary 10, 2009, I OW 165/08, Legalis.
Google Scholar

Decision of the Supreme Administrative Court of April 19, 2012, I OW 19/12, Legalis.
Google Scholar

Decision of the Supreme Administrative Court of Decem¬ber 2, 2015, II FSK 2968/15, Legalis.
Google Scholar

Decision of the Supreme Court of May 3, 1973, I CZ 48/73, LEX No. 7250.
Google Scholar

Flaga-Gieruszewska, K., Aniukiewicz, T., Kawęcka, K., Klich, A., Radkiewicz, T., & Wietchy, L. (2023). Postępowanie cywilne. Komentarz praktyczny dla sędziów i pełnomocników procesowych. Wzory pism sądowych i procesowych z przykładowymi stanami faktycznymi, linie orzecznicze, koszty sądowe [Civil Procedure. Practical Commentary for Judges and Trial Attorneys. Specimens of court and trial pleadings with sample facts, case law lines, court costs]. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Google Scholar

Gajda, J. [in:] K. Pietrzykowski (Ed.). (2023). Kodeks rodzinny i opiekuńczy. Komentarz, art. 147, Nb 1, art. 183, Nb 4.
Google Scholar

Grzybowski, S. (1985). System prawa cywilnego [Civil Law System], vol. 1. Polska Akademia Nauk, Instytut Nauk Prawnych.
Google Scholar

Ignaczewski, J. [in:] H. Ciepła, J. Ignaczewski, & J. Skibiń¬ska-Adamowicz (Eds.). (2014). Komentarz do spraw rodzinnych [Commentary on family matters]. War¬szawa: LexisNexis.
Google Scholar

Jastrzemska, S. [in:] T. Szanciło (Ed.). (2023). Kodeks Postępowania Cywilnego. Komentarz, [Code of Civil Procedure. Commentary], vol. II, art. 600, Nb 3. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Google Scholar

Judgment of the Provincial Administrative Court in Gdańsk of May 17, 2017, I SA/Gd 1743/16, Legalis.
Google Scholar

Judgment of the Supreme Court of February 17, 1981, II CR 11/81, LEX No. 8308.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Judgment of the Supreme Court of June 7, 1983, II UR 4/83, Legalis.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of June 12, 2003, V SA 529/02, Legalis.
Google Scholar

Judgement of the Supreme Court of September 6, 2017, I CSK 331/17, LEX No. 2382434.
Google Scholar

Kalus, S. [in:] M. Habdas, & M. Fras (Eds.). (2018). Kodeks Cywilny. Komentarz [Civil Code Commentary], vol. 1. Wolters Kluwer Polska.
Google Scholar

Kozioł, A., & Twardoch, P. [in:] M. Pazdan (Ed.). (2018). Prawo prywatne międzynarodowe. Komentarz [Private International Law. Commentary], Legalis.
Google Scholar

Łukasiewicz, J.M. (Ed.). (2014). Instytucje prawa rodzinnego [Institutions of family law]. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
Google Scholar

Nazaruk, P. [in:] J. Ciszewski (Ed.). (2023). Civil Code. Updated commentary. LEX.
Google Scholar

Partyk, A. [in:] O.M. Piaskowska (Ed.). (2023). Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Postępowanie nieprocesowe. Postępowanie w razie zaginięcia lub zniszczenia akt. Postępowanie zabezpieczające. Komentarz aktualizo¬wany [Code of Civil Procedure. Non-procedural pro¬ceedings. Proceedings in case of lost or destroyed files. Collateral proceedings. Commentary updated]. LEX.
Google Scholar

Resolution of the Supreme Court of February 21, 1968, III CZP 105/67, OSNC 1968/10/162.
Google Scholar