THE RUSSIA-UKRAINE WAR AND THE RENAISSANCE OF IR REALISM
Piotr Pietrzak
a:1:{s:5:"pl_PL";s:39:"Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski"";}Abstract
Realism is one of the leading theories in the study of international relations, originating from thinkers like Thucydides, Machiavelli, and Hobbes, and later articulated by 20th-century scholars like Hans Morgenthau, Kenneth Waltz, John Mearsheimer, and Stephen Walt. It posits that international politics is characterized by anarchy and a struggle for power between sovereign nation-states pursuing their national interests driven by human nature and the structure of power. However, after 1991, many scholars wanted to discredit it as an obsolete, dysfunctional, old way of doing things. The same critical voices pushed countries like Ukraine to surrender the nuclear arsenal that they inherited after the collapse of the Soviet Union in exchange for some empty security assurances in Budapest in 1994. Today, the same voices are strangely silent when it comes to finding effective security policies. However, realists are ready to provide policymakers with effective systemic solutions not only to the war in Ukraine but others.References
Alaverdov, E., Tchabashvili, Z. (2024). The Role of the International Community in Turning Afghanistan Into a Failed State and Its Impact on International and Regional Security. Dealing with Regional Conflicts of Global Importance, edited by P. Pietrzak, 28‒43. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-9467-7.ch002. Google Scholar
Albertini, T., Pietrzak, P. (2020). Clarity is what I seek first: An interview with Professor Tamara Albertini by P. Pietrzak. In Statu Nascendi ‒ Journal of Political Philosophy and International Relations, 3 (2). Google Scholar
Akhtar, M. N., Javaid, F. (2024). The Role of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization in the Afghan Crisis. Dealing with Regional Conflicts of Global Importance, edited by P. Pietrzak, 44‒62. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-9467-7.ch003. Google Scholar
Bag, A., Souvik R., Shah, A. I. (2024). Decoding the US-NATO Dynamics: A Thorough Analysis of Donald Trump and Joe Biden's Foreign Policy Approaches. Dealing with Regional Conflicts of Global Importance, edited by P.Pietrzak, 104‒123. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-9467-7.ch006. Google Scholar
Bharti, S. S., Aryal, S. K. (2024). The Global Aspirations of the European Union and Dealing with Regional Conflicts. Analyzing Global Responses to Contemporary Regional Conflicts, edited by P. Pietrzak, 236‒251. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2837-8.ch011. Google Scholar
Brzezinski, Z. (2010). Out of Control: Global Turmoil on the Eve of the Twenty-first Century. Touchstone. Google Scholar
Brzezinski, Z. (1997). The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives, Washington DC: Basic Books. Google Scholar
Chotiner, I. (2022, March 1). Why John Mearsheimer Blames the U.S. for the Crisis in Ukraine. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/why-john-mearsheimer-blames-the-us-for-the-crisis-in-ukraine. Google Scholar
Gamaghelyan, P. (2017). Conflict Resolution Beyond the Realist Paradigm : Transformative Strategies and Inclusive Practices in Nagorno-Karabakh and Syria. La Vergne: Ibidem Press. Google Scholar
Gamaghelyan, P. (2017). Conflict resolution beyond the international relations paradigm: Evolving designs as a transformative practice in Nagorno-Karabakh and Syria. Google Scholar
Javaid, F. (2024). Challenges and Opportunities for Regional Connectivity: Afghanistan's Role Between Pakistan and the Central Asian Region. Analyzing Global Responses to Contemporary Regional Conflicts, edited by P. Pietrzak, 275‒297. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2837-8.ch013. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Penguin UK. Google Scholar
Katzenstein, P. (2018). The Second Coming? Reflections on a Global Theory of International Relations, The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 11 (4): 373–390. Google Scholar
Kavalski, E. (2007). The fifth debate and the emergence of complex international relations theory: notes on the application of complex theory to the study of international life. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 20 (3): 435–454, https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570701574154. Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Latifur, K., Feng, L. (2002). Ontology Construction for Information Selection. 14th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI 2002). Proceedings. 122–127. Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, J.J. (2002). The tragedy of great power politics. West Lafayette, IN, C-SPAN Archives. Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, J.J. (2014). Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault. Foreign Affairs 93 (5): 77–89. Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, J.J. (1993). The case for a Ukrainian nuclear deterrent. Foreign Affairs (New York, N.Y.): 50–66. Google Scholar
Ozigci, Y. E. (2024). On the Mutual Inherence of Regional and Global References: The Case of the “Near-Abroad” and “Post-Bipolarity”. Analyzing Global Responses to Contemporary Regional Conflicts, edited by P. Pietrzak, 52‒72. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2837-8.ch003. Google Scholar
Ozigci, Y. E. (2023). On the German Foreign Policy Sonderweg: The Mittellage and the Mitteleuropa. Statu Nascendi – Journal of Political Philosophy and International Relations, 2: 165–192. Google Scholar
Pawłuszko, T. [Forthcoming 2024]. War in Ukraine and the Limits of International Relations Theory in Pietrzak, P. (Ed.). (2025). Exploring the Implications of Local and Regional Conflicts. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2877-4. Google Scholar
Pietrzak, P. (2024a). The Sixth Great Debate in International Relations Theory Revolves Around Clarity: Ontology in statu nascendi as a Cutting-Edge Tool for Conflict Management. Dealing with Regional Conflicts of Global Importance, edited by P. Pietrzak, 1–27. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2024. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-9467-7.ch001. Google Scholar
Pietrzak, P. (2024b). Poland, a Benign but Not a Naïve Power in Its Response to Russia's War in Ukraine (2022-Present): Assertive Pursuit of Enlightened Self-Interest – Forging New Alliances and Strengthening Existing Ones. Dealing with Regional Conflicts of Global Importance, edited by P. Pietrzak, 124‒160. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-9467-7.ch007. Google Scholar
Pietrzak, P. (2024c). The Geoeconomics of NATO's Responses to Russia's Invasion of Ukraine (2022-Present). Analyzing Global Responses to Contemporary Regional Conflicts, edited by P. Pietrzak, 1‒38. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2837-8.ch001. Google Scholar
Pietrzak, P. (2024d). Henry Kissinger's Shift on Ukraine and Its Implications for Russia: The Commencement but Not a Conclusion of the Sixth Great Debate in International Relations. Analyzing Global Responses to Contemporary Regional Conflicts, edited by P. Pietrzak, 133–162. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2837-8.ch007. Google Scholar
Pietrzak, P. (2024f). The Sikorski – Tusk Doctrine, and Poland’s Response to Russia’s War in Ukraine: Policy Recommendations for Poland Ahead of the Presidential Elections in 2025. Exploring the Implications of Local and Regional Conflicts, edited by P. Pietrzak. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-2877-4. Google Scholar
Pietrzak. P. [Forthcoming 2024g]. The Changing Conceptual Landscape of the Russian War in Ukraine (2014–Present) & Syria (2011-Present), Journal of Liberty and International Affairs. Google Scholar
Pietrzak. P. (2023e). Exploring Conflicts in Ethiopia (2020–2022) and Ukraine (2014-, 2022-). Modern World Challenges: Regulating Human Rights, Social Security, and Welfare in Contemporary Multicultural World, edited by Aytekin Demircioğlu, Emilia Alaverdov. Google Scholar
Pietrzak, P. (2023d). The Giedroyć-Mieroszewski Doctrine and Poland’s Response to Russia’s Assault on Ukraine. Modern Diplomacy. Retrieved from https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2023/02/03/the-giedroyc-mieroszewski-doctrine-and-polands-response-to-russias-assault-on-ukraine. Google Scholar
Pietrzak, P. (2023c). The Brzezinski Doctrine and NATO’s Response to Russia’s Assault on Ukraine. Modern Diplomacy. Retrieved from https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2023/01/12/the-brzezinski-doctrine-and-natos-response-to-russias-assault-on-ukraine/>. Google Scholar
Pietrzak, P. (2023b). Approaching regional conflicts through the prism of ontology in statu nascendi – the new compartmentalization of IR theory. In Statu Nascendi – Journal of Political Philosophy and International Relations, 6 (1): p. 93–148, ISBN: 9783838217826. Google Scholar
Pietrzak, P. (2022d). Introducing the idea of Ontology in statu nascendi to the broader International Relations Theory, International Conference Proceeding Series ‒ International Conference on Economics and Social Sciences in Serik, Turkey on 21 ‒ 23 Oct 2022. Google Scholar
Pietrzak, P. (2022b). A Comparative Study of Russia’s War in Ukraine (2014-, including its 2022 escalation), Russia’s aggression in Georgia (2008), and Russia’s Military Operations in Syria (2015-). International Conference Proceeding Series ‒ VII. International Middle East Symposium: Political and Social Stability in the Middle East (May 10‒11th, 2022, Online). Google Scholar
Pietrzak, P. (2022a). The Putinization of the situation of women and children during the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. In Statu Nascendi, 5 (2). Journal of Political Philosophy and International Relations: Special Issue: Gender Equality in Politics and International Relations: 19‒76. Google Scholar
Pietrzak, P. (2021). On the Idea of Humanitarian Intervention: A New Compartmentalization of IR Theories. Stuttgart: Ibidem Verlag. Google Scholar
Пиетшак, П. (2022). Балканският полуостров „in statu nascendi“ и защо понятието „балканизация“ не е вече адекватно? Международни отношения, LI, N 2: 59‒64. Google Scholar
Pinto, H. S., Gomez-Perez, A., Martins, J. P. (1999). Some Issues on Ontology Integration. Proceedings of IJCAI99’s Workshop on Ontologies and Problem Solving Methods: Lessons Learned and Future Trends, 7.1–7.12. Google Scholar
Pinto, H. S., Martins, J. P. (2001). A Methodology for Ontology Integration. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Knowledge Capture, K-CAP’01: 131–138. ACM Press. Google Scholar
Przeworski, A., Teune, H. (1970). The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience. Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1991). Comparing and Miscomparing, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 3(3): 243‒257, https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692891003003001. Google Scholar
Unrefugees (2024). Ukraine Refugee Crisis : Aid, Statistics and News | USA for UNHCR, https://www.unrefugees.org/emergencies/ukraine. Google Scholar
Walt, S. (2015). What Should We Do if the Islamic State Wins? Foreign Policy. Available at: Google Scholar
/what-should-we-do-if-isis-islamic-state-wins-containment/[Accessed on 13/08/2015 at 09:10]. Google Scholar
Walt, S. (1987). The origins of alliance. Cornell University Press: New York. Google Scholar
Waltz, K. N. (2000). Structural realism after the cold war. International Security 25 (1). Google Scholar
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of World Politics. Massachusetts: Addison & Wesley. Google Scholar
Waltz, K. N. Why Iran Should Get the Bomb. Nuclear Balancing Would Mean Stability. Foreign Policy, July/August 2012 Issue, Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/iran/2012-06-15/why-iran-should-get-bomb. Google Scholar
a:1:{s:5:"pl_PL";s:39:"Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski"";}
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Czasopismo publikowane jest na licencji Open Access CC BY-NC-ND 3.0. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/)
Redakcja wyraża zgodę na umieszczanie opublikowanych artykułów na stronach internetowych autorów, stronach internetowych jednostek naukowych i repozytoriów.