“Jungle” or “Playground”? On Metaphors in International Relations – A Review of Riikka Kuusisto’s Competing Metaphors for International Relations. Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group). London–New York 2025, pp. 186

Barbara Chmielewska

Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie UWM
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4684-974X





Beer F.A., Landtsheer Ch. de (red.) (2004): Metaphorical World Politics. East Lansing.   Google Scholar

Burke K. (1969): A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley–Los Angeles–London.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Chilton P.A. (1996): Security Metaphors: Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common House. New York.   Google Scholar

Chilton P.A., Lakoff G. (1995): Foreign Policy by Metaphor. [W:] Language and Peace. Red. C. Schäffner, A.L. Welden. Aldershot, s. 37–59.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Fabiszak M. (2007): A Conceptual Metaphor Approach to War Discourse and Its Implications. Poznań.   Google Scholar

Fukuyama F. (1992): The End of History and the Last Man. London.   Google Scholar

Galtung J. (1975): Peace: Research, Education, Action. Essays in Peace Research. Vol. I. Copenhagen.   Google Scholar

Lakoff G. (2000): Metaphorical Thought in Foreign Policy: Why Strategic Framing Matters. New York.   Google Scholar

Lakoff G., Johnson M. (1980): Metaphors We Live By. Chicago–London.   Google Scholar

Lakoff G., Turner M. (1989): More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago–London.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Lapka O. (2021): Language of Persuasion: Analysis of Conceptual Metaphors in Political Discourse. „The Grove – Working Papers on English Studies” 28, s. 85–110.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Little R. (2007): The Balance of Power in International Relations: Metaphors, Myths and Models. Cambridge.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Marks M.P. (2011): Metaphors in International Relations Theory. New York.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Marks M.P. (2018): Revisiting Metaphors in International Relations Theory. New York.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Neagu M.-I. (2013): Decoding Political Discourse: Conceptual Metaphors and Argumentation. London.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Perelman Ch. (1982): The Realm of Rhetoric. Notre Dame.   Google Scholar

Perelman Ch., Olbrechts-Tyteca L. (1971): The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame.   Google Scholar

Sandikcioglu E. (2001): The Otherness of the Orient: Politico-cultural Implications of Ideological Categorisations. [W:] Language and Ideology. Vol. 2: Descriptive Cognitive Approaches. Red. R. Dirven, R.M. Frank, C. Ilie. Amsterdam–Philadelphia, s. 161–188.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Sandikcioglu E. (2003): More Metaphorical Warfare in the Gulf: Orientalist Frames in News Coverage. [W:] Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Red. A. Barcelona. Berlin–New York, s. 299–320.
Crossref   Google Scholar


Published
2026-06-30

Cited by

Chmielewska, B. (2026). “Jungle” or “Playground”? On Metaphors in International Relations – A Review of Riikka Kuusisto’s Competing Metaphors for International Relations. Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group). London–New York 2025, pp. 186. Papers in Linguistics, 28(2), 281–286. https://doi.org/10.31648/pj.12524

Barbara Chmielewska 
Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie UWM
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4684-974X