Zalecenia dotyczące leczenia jako złożony proces: sekwencyjny rozwój akceptacji
Abstrakt
Publikacja przedstawia empirycznie ugruntowane obserwacje dotyczące interakcyjnej organizacji zaleceń lekarskich w kontekście polskiej opieki zdrowotnej. Opierając się na metodzie analizy konwersacyjnej, tekst przybliża praktyki dyskursywne wykorzystywane przy konstruowaniu zaleceń leczenia. Artykuł rozpoczyna się od zarysowania tła dostępnych badań interakcyjnych nad organizacją zaleceń w polskiej komunikacji lekarz-pacjent, po czym następuje analiza sekwencyjna przebiegu rozmów dotyczących leczenia inwazyjnego i rozwoju tychże do momentu akceptacji przez pacjenta. Stwierdzono, że pacjenci i lekarze wspólnie zarządzają progresywnością działań związanych z zaleceniami dotyczącymi leczenia w celu osiągnięcia wzajemnie akceptowalnego scenariusza.
Słowa kluczowe:
język polski, analiza konwersacyjna, komunikacja lekarz-pacjent, analiza sekwencyjna, zalecenia lekarskieBibliografia
Ajdukiewicz K. (1975): Logika pragmatyczna. Warszawa. Google Scholar
Barnes R.K., Woods C.J. (2024): Communication in Primary Healthcare: A State-of-the-Art Literature Review of Conversation-Analytic Research. Research on Language and Social Interaction 57(1), pp. 7–37.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Bolden G. (2008): “So what’s up?”: Using the discourse marker So to launch conversational business. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(3), pp. 302–337.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Coulter A., Jenkinson C. (2005): European patients’ views on the responsiveness of health systems and healthcare providers. European Journal of Public Health 15(4), pp. 355–360.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Czachowski S., Pawlikowska T. (2011): “These reforms killed me”: doctors’ perceptions of family medicine during the transition from communism to capitalism. Family Practice, pp. 1–7.
Crossref
Google Scholar
De Marco G. et al. (2024): What makes a medical intervention invasive?. Journal of Medical Ethics 50(4), pp. 226–233.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Drew P. (1992): Contested evidence in a courtroom cross-examination: the case of a trial for rape. [W:] Talk at Work: Social Interaction in Institutional Settings. P. Drew, J. Heritage (eds). Cambridge, pp. 470–520. Google Scholar
Drew P., Heritage J. (1992): Talk at Work: Language Use in Institutional and Work-Place Settings. Cambridge. Google Scholar
Ekberg K., Beach W.A., Jones D. (2024): Communication in Outpatient Secondary Care: A State-of-the-Art Literature Review of Conversation-Analytic Research. Research on Language and Social Interaction 57(1), pp. 38–54.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Gill V.T., Pomerantz A., Denvir P. (2009): Pre-emptive resistance: patients’ participation in diagnostic sense-making activities. Sociology of Health and Illness 32(1), pp. 1–20.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Heritage J. (2008): Conversation Analysis as Social Theory. [W:] The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. B. Turner (ed.). Oxford, pp. 300–320.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Heritage J. (2012): Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45, pp. 1–25.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Heritage J. (2013): Action formation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds. Discourse Studies 15(5), pp. 551–578.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Heritage J., Clayman S.E. (2010): Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities and Institutions. Oxford.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Jefferson G. (1984): On Stepwise Transition From Talk About a Trouble to Inappropriately Next-Positioned Matters. [W:] Structures of Social Action. J.M. Atkinson, J. Heritage (eds). Cambridge, pp. 191–221.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Jefferson G. (1986): Notes on ‘Latency’ in Overlap Onset. Human Studies 9, pp. 153–183.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Jefferson G. (1990): List Construction as a Task and Interactional Resource. [W:] Interaction Competence. G. Psathas (ed.). Lanham, pp. 63–92. Google Scholar
Jefferson G. (2004): Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. [W:] Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. G.H. Lerner (ed.). Amsterdam, pp. 13–31.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Koenig Ch.J. (2008): The interactional dynamics of treatment counseling in primary care. [Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of California Los Angeles]. Google Scholar
Kärkkäinen E. (2003): Epistemic stance in English conversation: A description of its interactional functions, with a focus on I think. Amsterdam.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Lerner G. (1991): On the Syntax of Sentences in Progress. Language in Society 20, pp. 441–458.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Lerner G. (1996): On the ‘semi-permeable’ character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. [W:] Interaction and Grammar. E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff, S.A. Thompson (eds). Cambridge, pp. 238–276.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Marcinowicz L., Chlabicz S., Grebowski R. (2009): Patient satisfaction with healthcare provided by family doctors: primary dimensions and an attempt at typology. BMC Health Services Research 9(63).
Crossref
Google Scholar
Maynard D. (1980): Placement of topic changes in conversation. Semiotica 30, pp. 263–290.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Oleszczyk M., et al. (2012): Family medicine in post-communist Europe needs a boost. Exploring the position of family medicine in healthcare systems of Central and Eastern Europe and Russia. BMC Family Practice 13(15).
Crossref
Google Scholar
Ostrowska A. (2003): Poverty as a Factor Influencing Doctor – Patient Partnerships: Case Poland. Social Exclusion, Inequality, and Health: An International Workshop. Brown University. Google Scholar
Ostrowska A. (2011): Paternalizm i partnerstwo. Społeczny kontekst relacji lekarz-pacjent. [W:] Etyczne aspekty decyzji medycznych. J. Hartman, M. Waligóra (eds). Warszawa. Google Scholar
Piasecka-Robak A. (2020): Health communication in Poland: Barriers Precluding Hope For Good Physician-Patient Communication. [W:] Education Excellence and Innovation Management: A 2025 Vision to Sustain Economic Development during Global Challenges. K.S. Solimas (ed.). Proceedings of the 35th International Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA). Spain, pp. 16703–16712. Google Scholar
Rancew-Sikora D. (2007): Analiza konwersacyjna jako metoda badania rozmów codziennych. Warszawa. Google Scholar
Ratajska A., Nowakowska-Arendt A., Zając M. (2023): Teaching clinical communication skills in postgraduate medical education with particular emphasis on palliative medicine. Palliative Medicine in Practice 17(2), pp. 105–110.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Sacks H. (1995): Lectures on Conversation. Oxford.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Sacks H., Schegloff E.A., Jefferson G. (1974): A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4), pp. 696–735.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Schegloff E.A. (1987): Analyzing Single Episodes of Interaction: An Exercise in Conversation Analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly 50(2), pp. 101–114.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Schegloff E.A. (2007): Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Vol. 1. Cambridge.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Schegloff E.A., Sacks H. (1973): Opening up closings. Semiotica 8, pp. 289–327.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Schiffrin D. (1987): Discourse Markers. Cambridge.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Sidnell J., Stivers T. (2012): The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Boston.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Stangierska I., Sikorska-Horst W. (2007): Ogólne zasady komunikacji między pacjentem a lekarzem. Forum Medycyny Rodzinnej 1(1), pp. 58–68. Google Scholar
Stivers T. (2004): “No no no” and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction. Human Communication Research 30(2), pp. 260–293.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Stivers T. (2005): Parent Resistance to Physicians’ Treatment Recommendations: One Resource for Initiating a Negotiation of the Treatment Decision. Health Communication 18(1), pp. 41–74.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Stivers T. (2007): Prescribing Under Pressure: Parent-Physician Conversations and Antibiotics. New York City.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Stivers T., Hayashi M. (2010): Transformative Answers: One Way to Resist a Question’s Constraints. Language in Society 39(01), pp. 1–25.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Stivers T., Tate A. (2023): The Role of Health Care Communication in Treatment Outcomes. Annual Review of Linguistics 9, pp. 233–252.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Toerien M. (2021): When do patients exercise their right to refuse treatment? A conversation analytic study of decision-making trajectories in UK neurology outpatient consultations. Soc Sci Med 290, s. 114278.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Wang N. (2023): Resistance to treatment recommendations: An interactional resource to increase information exchange and promote shared decision-making in medical encounters. [W:] Language, Health and Culture. N. Wang (ed.), pp. 60–81.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Weidner M. (2012): On the organization of doctor-patient communication in Polish talk-in-interaction: practices for building questions, negotiating knowledge and recommending treatment. [Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Antwerp]. Google Scholar
Weidner M. (2018): Treating something as self-evident: No-prefaced turns in Polish. [W:] Between Turn and Sequence. Turn-initial particles across languages. J. Heritage, M.-L. Sorjonen (eds). Amsterdam, pp. 225–250.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Wierzbicka A. (2003): Cross-cultural pragmatics: the semantics of human interaction. Berlin.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Zinken J. (2016): Requesting Responsibility. The Morality of Grammar in Polish and English Family Interaction. Oxford.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Zinken J., Ogiermann E. (2011): How to propose an action as objectively necessary: the case of Polish Trzeba X (“one needs to x”). Research on Language and Social Interaction 44(3), pp. 263–287.
Crossref
Google Scholar
