Artificial Neural Networks as a tool for ergonomic evaluations of vehicle control panels

Joanna Hałacz

a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:73:"University Of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Technical Scientes";}

Maciej Neugebauer




Abstract

Unreadable and inconveniently arranged instruments make it difficult for the driver to accurately read signals and understand the relayed information. They can distract the driver and prolong response times, thus posing a risk to traffic safety. Designers also have to account for customer expectations, including a demand for esthetically appealing dashboards that incorporate vast amounts of data in limited space since such dashboards appear to be maximally adapted to the driver’s needs. However, attractive dashboards are not always adapted to human perceptual abilities.
A neural model was developed in the study to objectively assess dashboard ergonomics in passenger cars. The data were used to determine the correlations between subjective driver impressions and the functionality and ergonomics of dashboards evaluated objectively based on the adopted criteria. With the best-learned networks, 3 conformance classes were obtained for the predicted cases. However, taking into account the ± 1 class, as many as 3 of the preserved ANN gave correct answers in all 6 cases.


Keywords:

dashboard design, vehicle ergonomics, human-machine interaction, Artificial Neural Networks, ergonomics of signaling devices, driver behavior


ALMONACID F., RUS C., PÉREZ-HIGUERAS P., HONTORIA L. 2011. Calculation of the energy provided by a PV generator. Comparative study: Conventional methods vs. artificial neural networks. Energy, 36: 375-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.10.028.
Crossref   Google Scholar

BALDWIN C.L. 2002. Designing in-vehicle technologies for older drivers: Application of sensory-cognitive interaction theory. Theoretical Issues In Ergonomic Science, 3(4): 307-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922021000009029.
Crossref   Google Scholar

BASTIEN J.M.C., SCAPIN D.L. 1992. A validation of ergonomic criteria for the evaluation of human‐computer interfaces. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 4(2): 183-196. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10447319209526035.
Crossref   Google Scholar

BHATTACHARYA S., BISHT D.S. 2021. Usability Analysis of Warning Icons in Passenger Car Dashboards in India Using Modified System Usability Scale (SUS). In: Design for Tomorrow. Volume 1. Eds. A. Chakrabarti, R. Poovaiah, P. Bokil, V. Kant. ICoRD 2021. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 221. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0041-8_30.
Crossref   Google Scholar

BURNETT G.E., PORTER J.M. 2001. Ubiquitous computing within cars: designing controls for non-visual use. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55(4 ): 521-531. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2001.0482.
Crossref   Google Scholar

CARVALHO R., SOARES M. 2012. Ergonomic and usability analysis on a sample of automobile dashboards. Work, 41(Supplement 1): 1507-1514. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0345-1507.
Crossref   Google Scholar

FRANÇOIS M., OSIURAK F., FORT A., CRAVE P., NAVARRO J. 2021. Usability and acceptance of truck dashboards designed by drivers: Two participatory design approaches compared to a user-centered design. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 81: 103073, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2020.103073.
Crossref   Google Scholar

GHASEMI F., KALATPOUR O., MOGHIMBEIGI A., MOHAMMADFAM I. 2017. A Neural Network Classifier Model for Forecasting Safety Behavior at Workplaces. Iranian Journal of Health, Safety and Environment, 4(4): 835-843.   Google Scholar

GIBSON M., LEE J., VENKATRAMAN V., PRICE M., LEWIS J., MONTGOMERY O., FOLEY J. 2016. Situation Awareness, Scenarios, and Secondary Tasks: Measuring Driver Performance and Safety Margins in Highly Automated Vehicles. SAE International Journal of Passenger   Google Scholar

Cars-Electronic and Electrical Systems, 9: 237-242. https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-0145.
Crossref   Google Scholar

GIBSON Z., BUTTERFIELD J., MARZANO A. 2016. User-centered design criteria in next generation vehicle consoles. Procedia CIRP, 55(2016): 260-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.024.
Crossref   Google Scholar

GKOUSKOS D., NORMARK C.J., LUNDGREN S. 2014. What drivers really want: Investigating dimensions in automobile user needs. International Journal of Design, 8(1): 59-71.   Google Scholar

HAJ MAHMOUD O., PONTONNIER C., DUMONT G., POLI S., MULTON F. 2021. A neural networks approach to determine factors associated with self-reported discomfort in picking tasks. Human Factors. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211047640.
Crossref   Google Scholar

KIM S.J,. DEY A.K., LEE J., FORLIZZI J. 2011. Usability of car dashboard displays for elder drivers. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, p. 493-502.
Crossref   Google Scholar

KLAUER S.G., GUO F., SIMONS-MORTON B.G., OUIMET M.C., LEE S.E., DINGUS T.A. 2014. Distracted driving and risk of road crashes among novice and experienced drivers. New England Journal of Medicine, 370(1): 54-59. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1204142.
Crossref   Google Scholar

KOLICH M., SEAL N., TABOUN S. 2004. Automobile seat comfort prediction: statistical model vs. artificial neural network. Applied Ergonomics, 35(3): 275-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2004.01.007.
Crossref   Google Scholar

KRÓLCZYK J., MATUSZEK D., TUKIENDORF M. 2008. Wykorzystanie sieci neuronowych (fbm) do modelowania procesu mieszania dwuskładnikowych układów ziarnistych. Inżynieria Rolnicza, 7(105): 117-122.   Google Scholar

KUMAR A., MOHAN D., PATEL R., VARGHESE M. 2002. Development of grain threshers based on ergonomic design criteria. Applied Ergonomics, 33(5): 503-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00029-7.
Crossref   Google Scholar

KWATER T., KĘDZIOR Z., TWARÓG B. 2001. Estimation by artificial neural network in ecological problems. AMSE-Conference, Lviv (Ukraine), p. 212-215.   Google Scholar

LANDAU K.E. 2002. The development of driver assistance systems following usability criteria. Behaviour and Information Technology, 21(5): 341-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929021000048457.
Crossref   Google Scholar

LIN C.J., BELIS T.T., KUO T.C. 2019. Ergonomics-Based Factors or Criteria for the Evaluation of Sustainable Product Manufacturing. Sustainability, 11: 4955. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184955.
Crossref   Google Scholar

LIU J., YU S., CHU J. 2020. Comfort Evaluation of an Aircraft Cabin System Employing a Hybrid Model. Sustainability, 12: 8503. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208503.
Crossref   Google Scholar

MA J., ZUO Y., GONG Z. 2019. Prediction Model of Driving Performance Indicators in Center Control Screen Location Layout Based On BP Neural Network. 2nd International Conference on Information Science and Electronic Technology (ISET 2019). https://doi.org/10.23977/iset.2019.053.   Google Scholar

MARCUS A. 2015. The Next Revolution: Vehicle User Interfaces. HCI and User-Experience Design. Springer, London, p. 91-100.
Crossref   Google Scholar

MEIRING G.A.M., MYBURGH H.C. 2015. A review of intelligent driving style analysis systems and related artificial intelligence algorithms. Sensors, 15(12): 30653-30682. https://doi.org/10.3390/s151229822.
Crossref   Google Scholar

MENANNO M., SAVINO M.M., CIARAPICA F.E. 2021. Exploring continuous improvement for safety management systems through artificial neural networks. International Journal of Product Development, 25(3): 213-241.
Crossref   Google Scholar

NADDEO A., CAPPETTI N., IPPOLITO O. 2014. Dashboard Reachability and Usability Tests: A Cheap and Effective Method for Drivers’ Comfort Rating. SAE International in United States, Technical Paper 2014-01-0455. https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-0455.
Crossref   Google Scholar

NANDY A., GOUCHER-LAMBERT K. 2022. Do Human and Computational Evaluations of Similarity Align? An Empirical Study of Product Function. ASME. Journal of Mechanical Design, 144(4): 041404. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4053858.
Crossref   Google Scholar

OU Y.K., LIU Y.C., SHIH F.Y. 2013. Risk prediction model for drivers’ in-vehicle activities – Application of task analysis and back-propagation neural network. Transportation Research. Part F. Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 18, 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.151.
Crossref   Google Scholar

PARK D., PARK S., KIM W., RHIU I., MYUNG HWAN YUN M.H. 2019. A comparative study on subjective feeling of engine acceleration sound by automobile types. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 74: 102843, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2019.102843.
Crossref   Google Scholar

PATTERSON D.W. 1995. Artificial Neural Networks: theory and applications. Prentice Hall, Singapore.   Google Scholar

RAHIMDEL M., MIRZAEI M., SATTARVAND J., GHODRATI B., MIRZAEI NASIRABAD H. 2017. Artificial neural network to predict the health risk caused by whole body vibration of mining trucks. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Vibration and Acoustics, 3(1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.22064/TAVA.2016.43016.1047.   Google Scholar

RAHMAN M.H., SCHIMPF C., XIE C., SHA Z. 2019. A Computer-Aided Design Based Research Platform for Design Thinking Studies. ASME. Journal of Mechanical Design, 141(12): 121102. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4044395.
Crossref   Google Scholar

RUTKOWSKA D., PILIŃSKI M., RUTKOWSKI L. 1997. Sieci neuronowe, algorytmy genetyczne i systemy rozmyte. PWN, Warszawa.   Google Scholar

RUTKOWSKI L. 1996. Sieci neuronowe i neurokomputery. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Częstochowskiej, Częstochowa.   Google Scholar

SALAH R.A., ALNAHHAL M.J. 2012. Neural network and multiple linear regression to predict school children dimensions for ergonomic school furniture design. Applied Ergonomics, 43(6): 979-984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2012.01.007.
Crossref   Google Scholar

SHA Z., KANNAN K.N., PANCHAL J.H. 2015. Behavioral Experimentation and Game Theory in Engineering Systems Design. ASME. Journal of Mechanical Design, 137(5): 051405. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029767.
Crossref   Google Scholar

SIMMONDS G.R.W. 1983. Ergonomics standards and research for cars Author links open overlay panel. Applied Ergonomics, 14(2): 97-101.
Crossref   Google Scholar

SWINGLER K., SMITH L.S. 1996. Cite as Producing a neural network for monitoring driver alertness from steering actions. Neural Computing & Applications, 4(2): 96-104.
Crossref   Google Scholar

TANG P., XU SUN X., CAO S. 2020. Investigating user activities and the corresponding requirements for information and functions in autonomous vehicles of the future. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 80: 103044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2020.103044.
Crossref   Google Scholar

TJOLLENG A., JUNG K., HONG W., LEE W., LEE B., YOU H., SON J., PARK S. 2017. Classification of a Driver’s cognitive workload levels using artificial neural network on ECG signals. Applied Ergonomics, 59(A): 326-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.09.013.
Crossref   Google Scholar

TOVARES N., BOATWRIGHT P., CAGAN J. 2014. Experiential Conjoint Analysis: An Experience-Based Method for Eliciting, Capturing, and Modeling Consumer Preference. ASME. Journal of Mechanical Design, 136(10): 101404. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4027985.
Crossref   Google Scholar

TSENG I., CAGAN J., KOTOVSKY K. 2011. Learning Stylistic Desires and Generating Preferred Designs of Consumers Using Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithms. Proceedings of the ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 5. 37th Design Automation Conference. Parts A and B. Washington, DC. August 28–31, p. 601-607. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2011-48642.
Crossref   Google Scholar

WANG S., ZHANG Y., GENLIN G., YANG J., WU J., WEI L. 2015. Fruit Classification by Wavelet-Entropy and Feedforward Neural Network Trained by Fitness-Scaled Chaotic ABC and Biogeography-Based Optimization. Entropy, 17(8): 5711-5728.
Crossref   Google Scholar

WELLINGS T., WILLIAMS M., TENNANT C. 2010. Understanding customers’ holistic perception of switches in automotive human – machine interfaces. Applied Ergonomics, 41(1), 8-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009.03.004.
Crossref   Google Scholar

WULFF I.A., WESTGAARD R.H., RASMUSSEN B. 1999. Ergonomic criteria in large-scale engineering design. II. Evaluating and applying requirements in the real world of design. Applied Ergonomics, 30(3): 207-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(98)00030-1.
Crossref   Google Scholar

YADAV A.K., CHANDEL S.S. 2014. Solar radiation prediction using Artificial Neural Network techniques: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 33: 772-781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.764.
Crossref   Google Scholar

YANG J., COUGHLIN J.F. 2014. In-vehicle technology for self-driving cars: Advantages and challenges for aging drivers. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 15: 333–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-014-0034-6.
Crossref   Google Scholar

YEGNANARAYANA B. 2009. Artificial Neural Networks. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.   Google Scholar

YU B.Y., HONDA T., SHARQAWY M., YANG M. 2016. Human behavior and domain knowledge in parameter design of complex systems. Design Studies, 45, Part B: 242-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.04.005.
Crossref   Google Scholar

ZHANG Z. 2018. Artificial Neural Network. In: Multivariate Time Series Analysis in Climate and Environmental Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67340-0.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Download


Published
2023-04-25

Cited by

Hałacz, J., & Neugebauer, M. (2023). Artificial Neural Networks as a tool for ergonomic evaluations of vehicle control panels. Technical Sciences, 26(26), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.31648/ts.8588

Joanna Hałacz 
a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:73:"University Of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Technical Scientes";}
Maciej Neugebauer 




License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





-->