Co-production of urban knowledge: Context approach for effective and efficient governance of cities

George Mark Onyango; Mirek Dymitrow; Michael Oloko; Stephen Gaya Agong

doi:10.31648/aspal.5728

Published: 2021-02-031

Vol. 20 No. 1 (2021)

Co-production of urban knowledge: Context approach for effective and efficient governance of cities

George Mark Onyango

, Mirek Dymitrow, Dr

, Michael Oloko, Dr , Stephen Gaya Agong, Prof

Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.31648/aspal.5728

Abstract

Effective and efficient governance is driven by policies that prevail in urban contexts. Policies are usually the result of knowledge co-production, but the efficacy of the process of translating knowledge into policy is still not well defined in the Kenyan context. One example of this is the city of Kisumu, which has been the focus of knowledge co-production by researchers from Kisumu and Gothenburg, and when there is active involvement of academics, policymakers, and the private sector. The creation of networks and platforms has been instrumental in knowledge production and has allowed for multi-level co-production facilitating the governance of the city at different spatial and administrative levels. Understanding of the different contexts that have been key in the knowledge production, in turn, is important for the process of determining how these have been the drivers of urban knowledge for governance in Kisumu.

Keywords:

co-production, urban knowledge, triple helix model, Kisumu, Kenya

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Onyango, G. M., Dymitrow, M., Oloko, M., & Agong, S. G. (2021). Co-production of urban knowledge: Context approach for effective and efficient governance of cities. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.31648/aspal.5728

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Arsovski, S., Kwiatkowski, M., Lewandowska, A., Peshevska, D.J., Sofeska, E., Dymitrow, M. (2018). Can urban environmental problems be overcome? The case of Skopje–world’s most polluted city. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 40(40), pp. 17–39.
Google Scholar

Avis, W.R. (2016). Urban governance (Topic guide). Birmingham, GSDRC, University of Birmingham.
Google Scholar

Brauer, R., Dymitrow, M., Tribe, J. (2019). The impact of tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, 77, pp. 64–78.
Google Scholar

Bukenya, B., Hickey, S., King, S. (2012). Understanding the role of context in shaping social accountability interventions: Towards an evidence-based approach. Manchester, University of Manchester.
Google Scholar

Collins, H.M., Evans, R. (2008). Rethinking expertise. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Constitution of Kenya (The Official Law Reports of the Republic of Kenya 2010, 1) (Kenya).
Google Scholar

Dymitrow, M., Brauer, R. (2017). Performing rurality. But who? Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series, 38, pp. 27–45.
Google Scholar

Dymitrow, M. (2017). Rural/urban redux: Conceptual problems and material effects. Gothenburg, University of Gothenburg.
Google Scholar

Frantzeskaki, N., Kabisch, N. (2016). Designing a knowledge co-production operating space for urban environmental governance–Lessons from Rotterdam, Netherlands and Berlin, Germany. Environmental Science & Policy, 62, pp. 90–98.
Google Scholar

Galuszka, J. (2018). What makes urban governance co-productive? Contradictions in the current debate on co-production. Planning Theory, 18(1), pp. 143–160. doi: 10.1177/1473095218780535.
Google Scholar

Greenhough, B. (2010). Vitalist geographies: Life and the more-than-human. In: Taking–place: Non–representational theories and geography. B., Anderson, P., Harrison (eds.). London, Routledge.
Google Scholar

Hendriks, F. (2013). Understanding good urban governance: Essentials, shifts, and values. Urban Affairs Review, 50(4), pp. 553–576.
Google Scholar

Katsamunska, P. (2016). The concept of governance and public governance theories. Economic Alternatives, 2, pp. 133–141.
Google Scholar

Kenya School of Government (2015). Practical approaches for county governments to facilitate public participation in the planning and budget process. Centre for Devolution Studies. Working Paper No. 6.
Google Scholar

Kisumu Action Team (2005). Minutes of the KAT meeting held on May 25, 2005. Kisumu, Kisumu Action Team.
Google Scholar

Kisumu Action Team (2006). Minutes of the KAT meeting held on January 20, 2006. Kisumu, Kisumu Action Team.
Google Scholar

Kisumu Action Team (2008). Minutes from the stakeholder meeting held on March 19, 2008 at Aga Khan hall. Kisumu, Kisumu Action Team.
Google Scholar

Krzysztofik, R., Dymitrow, M., Szmytkie, R., Kantor-Pietraga, I., Pełka-Gościniak, J., Spórna, T. (2015). Environmental hazards and urban abandonment: Case studies and typological issues. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 97(4), pp. 291–308.
Google Scholar

Laurini, R. (2017). Geographic knowledge infrastructure: Applications to territorial intelligence and smart cities. London, Elsevier.
Google Scholar

Lund, H.D. (2018). Co-creation in urban governance: From inclusion to innovation, Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 22(2), pp. 3–17.
Google Scholar

Malinauskienė, E. (2013). Conceptual framework for context-based e-government interoperability development. Socialinės Technologijos, 3(1), 68–84.
Google Scholar

Marzouki, A., Mellouli, S., Daniel, S. (2017). Towards a context-based citizen participation approach: A Literature review of citizen participation issues and a conceptual framework. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, New Delhi.
Google Scholar

May, T., Perry, B. (2017). Cities and the knowledge economy: Promise, politics and possibilities. London, Routledge.
Google Scholar

Muñoz-Erickson, T.A. (2014). Co-production of knowledge–action systems in urban sustainable governance: The KASA approach. Environmental Science & Policy, 37, pp. 182–191.
Google Scholar

Nesti, G. (2017). Co-production for innovation: The urban living lab experience. Policy and Society, 37(3), pp. 310–325.
Google Scholar

Onyango, G.M., Obera, B. (2014). Tracing Kisumu’s path in the co-production of knowledge for urban development. In: Co-producing knowledge for sustainable cities: Joining Forces for Change. M., Polk (ed.). London, Routledge.
Google Scholar

Perry, B., Patel, Z., Bretzer, Y.N., Polk, M. (2018). Organising for co-production: Local interaction platforms for urban sustainability. Politics and Governance, 6(1), pp. 189–198.
Google Scholar

Richardson, L., Durose, C., Perry, B. (2018). Coproducing urban governance. Politics and Governance, 6(1), pp. 145–149.
Google Scholar

Ritchie, J., Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London, Sage.
Google Scholar

Saparniene, D., Valukonyte, I. (2012). Implementation of good governance: Principles in local self-government: The Case of Siauliai City. Social Research, 3(28), pp. 98–112.
Google Scholar

Schlappa, H., Ramsden, P. (2000). Co-production: A new perspective on partnership. Urbact Tribune.
Google Scholar

Simonsen, K. (2013). In quest of a new humanism: Embodiment, experience and phenomenology as critical geography. Progress in Human Geography, 37(1), pp. 10–26.
Google Scholar

Smith, J., Firth, J. (2011). Qualitative data analysis: The framework approach. Nurse Researcher, 18(2), pp. 52–62.
Google Scholar

Srivastava, A., Thomson, S.B. (2009). Framework analysis: A qualitative methodology for applied policy research. Journal of Administration and Governance, 4(2), pp. 72–79.
Google Scholar

The County Governments Act (The Official Law Reports of the Republic of Kenya 2012, 17) (Kenya).
Google Scholar

Thrift, N. (2000). Performing cultures in the new economy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(4), pp. 674–692.
Google Scholar

UN Habitat (2004). Kisumu City Development Strategy. https://mirror.unhabitat.org/content.asp?typeid=19&catid=374&id=3580, date: 02.01.2021.
Google Scholar

Urban Areas and Cities Act (The Official Law Reports of the Republic of Kenya 2011, 13) (Kenya).
Google Scholar

Virtudes, A. (2016). ‘Good’ Governance Principles in Spatial Planning at Local Scale. Procedia Engineering, 161, pp. 1710–1714.
Google Scholar

Ward, D.J., Furber, C., Tierney, S., Swallow, V. (2013). Using framework analysis in nursing research: A worked example. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(11), pp. 2423–2431.
Google Scholar

von Wirth, T., Fuenfschilling, L., Frantzeskaki, N., Coenen, L. (2018). Impact of urban living labs on sustainability transitions: Mechanisms and strategies for systemic change through experimentation. European Planning Studies, 27(2), pp. 229–257.
Google Scholar

Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., Buys, L., Ioppolo, G., Sabatini-Marques, J., da Costa, E.M., Yun, J.J. (2018). Understanding ‘smart cities’: Intertwining development drivers with desired outcomes in a multidimensional framework. Cities, 81, pp. 145–160.
Google Scholar

George Mark Onyango

georgemarkonyango@maseno.ac.ke
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9349-899X

Affiliation:

Maseno University School of Planning and Architecture Kenya

Mirek Dymitrow, Dr

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6936-342X

Affiliation:

Lund University; University of Gothenburg Sweden

Michael Oloko, Dr

Affiliation:

Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology Kenya

Stephen Gaya Agong, Prof

Affiliation:

Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology Kenya