Micro-geographies of administration: a wolf in sheep's clothing? The impact of trust on a street-level approach to immigrant integration

Shelley Kotze; Mirek Dymitrow

doi:10.31648/aspal.9131

Published: 2024-07-101

Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024)

Micro-geographies of administration: a wolf in sheep's clothing? The impact of trust on a street-level approach to immigrant integration

Shelley Kotze

, Mirek Dymitrow

Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.31648/aspal.9131

Abstract

Increased global migration to welfare states puts pressure on successful integration. Successful integration is broadly associated with entry into the labour market. Therefore, integration is measured through employment. Attempts to increase migrant involvement in the labour market are often made by street-level organisations, where interactions between individuals from the private and/or public sector interact with the migrants. At this microlevel, seemingly innocuous administrative decisions made by individuals working to increase migrant labour integration are often overlooked, yet, as this study shows, have a significant impact on the perceived success of such projects. Using nonparticipant observation, chronological ordering and framework analysis, this paper investigates the dynamics of trust as a critical, yet underplayed dimension of the immigrant integration process within a Swedish street-level organisation. The findings reveal instances of immigrant commodification, exploitation of the project format and lack of cultural awareness, which can disrupt the delicate psychosocial relations at play, without ever being appreciated in official reports. Moreover, the impact of trust further impacts on the micro-geographies of immigrants and the integration process. We conclude that whilst the results of integration efforts should be evaluated at the macro level, the fundamentals of integration are set and often decided upon already at the street level

Keywords:

integration, trust, street-level approach, immigration, nonparticipant observation

Most read articles by the same author(s)

George Mark Onyango, Mirek Dymitrow, Dr, Michael Oloko, Dr, Stephen Gaya Agong, Prof, Co-production of urban knowledge: Context approach for effective and efficient governance of cities , Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum: Vol. 20 No. 1 (2021)

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Kotze, S., & Dymitrow, M. (2024). Micro-geographies of administration: a wolf in sheep’s clothing? The impact of trust on a street-level approach to immigrant integration. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum, 23(2), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.31648/aspal.9131

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Ager, A., & Strang, A. (2004). Indicators of Integration (no. 28). Home Office Development and Practice Report.
Google Scholar

Ager, A., & Strang, A. (2008). Understanding integration: a conceptual framework. Journal of Refugee Studies, 21(2), 166–191. htpps://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fen016
Crossref
Google Scholar

André, S. (2014). Does trust mean the same for migrants and natives? Testing measurement models of political trust with multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. Social Indicators Research, 115(3), 963–982. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11205-013-0246-6
Crossref
Google Scholar

Barley, S R. (1990) Images of imaging: Notes on doing longitudinal fieldwork. Organization Science, 1(3), 220–247.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Brodkin, E. Z. (2008). Accountability in street-level organization. International Journal of Public Administration, 31(3), 317–336. https://doi. org/10.1080/01900690701590587
Crossref
Google Scholar

Brodkin, E. Z. (2015). Street-level organizations and the “real world” of workfare: Lessons from the US. Social Work and Society, 13(1), 1–16.
Google Scholar

Brodkin, E. Z. (2016). Street-level organizations, inequality, and the future of human services. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 40(5), 444–450. https://doi.org/10.1080 /23303131.2016.1173503
Crossref
Google Scholar

Buvik, M. P., & Rolfsen, M. (2015). Prior ties and trust development in project teams – a case study from the construction industry. International Journal of Project Management, 33(7), 1484–1494. https://doi. org /10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.06.002
Crossref
Google Scholar

Carrera, S., & Atger, A. F. (2011). Integration as a two-way process in the EU: Assessing the relationship between the European Integration Fund and the Common Basic Principles on Integration. CEPS. https://www. ceps.eu/ceps-publications/integration-two-wayprocess-eu-assessing-relationship-between-europeanintegration-fund/
Google Scholar

Castles, S., Korac, M., Vasta, E., & Vertovec, S. (2002). Integration: Mapping the field. Report of a project carried out by the Centre for Migration and Policy Research and Refugee Studies Centre. University of Oxford. https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/ item_3012138_1/component/file_3012139/content
Google Scholar

Clark, T. (2008). ‘We’re over-researched here!’: Exploring accounts of research fatigue within qualitative research engagements. Sociology, 42(5), 953–970. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038-38508094573
Crossref
Google Scholar

Clark, T. (2010). Gaining and maintaining access: Exploring the mechanisms that support and challenge the relationship between gatekeepers and researchers. Qualitative Social Work, 10(4), 485–502. https://doi. org/10.1177/1473324009358228
Crossref
Google Scholar

Cooke-Davies, T. (2002). The ‘real’ success factors on projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20(3), 185–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263- 7863(01)00067-9
Crossref
Google Scholar

Craig, G. (2015). Migration and Integration: a local and experiential perspective. (IRiS Working Paper Series. No7/2015). Institute for Research into Superdiversity. https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/documents/collegesocial-sciences/social-policy/iris/2015/working-paperseries/iris-wp-7-2015.pdf
Google Scholar

Diedrich, A., & Hellgren, H. (2018). Organizing labour market integration of foreign-born persons in the Gothenburg metropolitan area. Gothenburg Research Institute.
Google Scholar

Dinesen, P. T., & Hooghe, M. (2018). When in Rome, do as the Romans do: The acculturation of generalized trust among immigrants in Western Europe. International Migration Review, 44, 697–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1747-7379.2010.00822.x
Crossref
Google Scholar

Dymitrow, M., & Brauer, R. (2014). Social deprivation and urbanity as the elephant in the room. In R. Efe, T. T. Onay, L. Sharuho, & E. Atasoy (Eds.), Urban and urbanization (pp. 381–395). St. Kliment Ohridski University Press.
Google Scholar

Dymitrow, M., & Ingelhag, K. (Eds.). (2020). Anatomy of a 21st-century sustainability project: The untold stories. Chalmers University of Technology.
Google Scholar

Dymitrow, M., Biegańska, J., & Grzelak‐Kostulska, E. (2018). Deprivation and the rural‐urban trap. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 109(1), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12263
Crossref
Google Scholar

Dymitrow, M., Brauer, R., Arsovski, S., & Biegańska, J. (2019). Atavism, layering and subversion: Understanding great social challenges of today through the lens of cultural contingents. Geographical Reviews, 52, 157–170. https://doi.org/10.37658/GR19520157d
Crossref
Google Scholar

Edwards, R. (2013). Power and trust: An academic researcher’s perspective on working with interpreters and gatekeepers. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(6), 503–514. https://doi.or g/10.1080/13645579.2013.823276
Crossref
Google Scholar

Eurostat (2011). Indicators of Immigrant Integration: A pilot study. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org /10.2785/13779
Google Scholar

Eurostat. (2019, May). Migration and migrant population statistics. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php/Migration_and_migrant_ population_statistics
Google Scholar

Eurostat. (2022, June) Migrant integration statistics – labour market indicators. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ statistics-explained/index.php?title=Migrant_ integration_statistics_%E2%80%93_labour_market_ indicators
Google Scholar

Eurostat. (2023, May). EU migrant flows intensify in 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostatnews/w/ddn-20230329-2#:~:text=In%202021%2C%20 there%20were%20an,a%20country%20outside%20 the%20EU
Google Scholar

Feltynowski, M., Senetra, A., Biegańska, J., GrzelakKostulska, E., Dymitrow, M., & Środa-Murawska, S. (2015). Some problems of local development: The example of former State Agricultural Farms in Poland. Research for Rural Development, 2, 237–243.
Google Scholar

Fisher, M. H. (2103). Migration: A world history. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Gabriel O. W. (2017). Participation and political trust. In S. Zmerli, & T. van der Meer (Eds.), Handbook on Political Trust (pp. 228–241). Edward Elgar.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S., & Redwood, S. (2013). Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, 118. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
Crossref
Google Scholar

Gil, N., Pinto, J. K., & Smyth, H. (2011). Trust in relational contracting and as a critical organizational attribute. In P. W. G. Morris, J. Pinto, & J. Söderlund (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of project management (pp. 438–460). Oxford University Press.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Handley, K., (2008). Non-participant observation. In R. Thorpe., & R, Holt (Eds.), The SAGE Dictionary of qualitative management research (pp. 143–145). Sage.
Google Scholar

Hansson, S. (2018). The role of trust in shaping urban planning in local communities: The case of Hammarkullen, Sweden. Bulletin of Geography. Socioeconomic Series, (40), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.2478/ bog-2018-0016
Crossref
Google Scholar

Haque, Z. (2010). What works with integrating new migrants? Runnymede Trust.
Google Scholar

Hardin, R. (2002). Trust and trustworthiness. Russell Sage Foundation.
Google Scholar

Hardin, R. (1993). The street-level epistemology of trust. Politics and Society, 21(4), 505–529. https://doi. org/10.1177/0032329293021004006
Crossref
Google Scholar

Hellgren, Z. (2016). Immigrant integration as a two-way process? Stakeholder discourses and practices in Stockholm and Barcelona. Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management, 4(1), 143–167. https:// doi.org/10.22381/PIHRM4120167
Crossref
Google Scholar

Hjerm, M. (2004). Immigrant entrepreneurship in the Swedish welfare state. Sociology, 38(4), 739–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038504045862
Crossref
Google Scholar

Hupe, P., Hill, M., & Buffat, A. (Eds). (2015). Understanding street-level bureaucracy. Policy Press.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Ibrahim, C. K. I. C., Costello, S. B., & Wilkinson, S. (2015). Key indicators influencing the management of team integration in construction projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 8(2), 300–323. DOI: 10.1108/IJMPB-04-2014-0028
Crossref
Google Scholar

International Organization for Migration (IOM). (2011). World Migration Report 2011: Communicating Effectively About Migration. https://publications.iom. int/system/files/pdf/wmr2011_english.pdf
Google Scholar

Korn, D. (2017, February 10). Kameler och getter ger ingen inträdesbiljett. Dagens Samhälle.
Google Scholar

Kotze, S., Blazheva, A., & Dymitrow, M. (2021). Ticking boxes and clocking in: A critical view of gender mainstreaming in labour-market integration. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography, 75(3), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2021 .1929453
Crossref
Google Scholar

Kotze, S., & Dymitrow, M. (2022). North–South research collaborations: An empirical evaluation against principles of transboundary research. Development Policy Review, 40(2), e12555. https://doi.org/10.1111/ dpr.12555
Crossref
Google Scholar

Krzysztofik, R., Dymitrow, M., Grzelak-Kostulska, E., & Biegańska, J. (2017). Poverty and social exclusion: An alternative spatial explanation. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 35, 45–64. https://doi. org/10.1515/bog-2017-0004
Crossref
Google Scholar

Kuntz, J., Connell, P., & Näswall, K. (2017) Workplace resources and employee resilience: The role of regulatory profiles. Career Development International, 22, 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-11-2016- 0208
Crossref
Google Scholar

Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political Trust and Trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1), 475–507. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev. polisci.3.1.475
Crossref
Google Scholar

Lewicki, R., McAllister, DJ., & Bies, RJ. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 438–458. https://doi. org/10.2307/259288.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. John Wiley.
Google Scholar

Lucassen, L. (2019). The Rise of the European Migration Regime and Its Paradoxes (1945–2020). International Review of Social History, 64(3), 515–531. https://doi. org/10.1017/S0020859019000415
Crossref
Google Scholar

Lui, F., & Maitlis, S. (2012). Nonparticipant observation. In A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of case study research (pp. 610–618). Sage Publications.
Google Scholar

Maxwell, R. (2010). Trust in Government among British Muslims: The Importance of Migration Status, Political Behavior, 32(1), 89–109. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11109-009-9093-1
Crossref
Google Scholar

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792
Crossref
Google Scholar

McAreavey, R., & Das, C. (2013). A delicate balancing act: Negotiating with gatekeepers for ethical research when researching minority communities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691301200102
Crossref
Google Scholar

McKnight, D. H., & Chervany, N. L. (2000). What is trust? A conceptual analysis and an interdisciplinary model. Proceeding of the AMCIS Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 827–833). AMCIS. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2000/382?utm_ source=aisel.aisnet.org%2Famcis2000%2F382&utm_ medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
Google Scholar

Meyers, M. K., & Vorsanger, S. (2003). Street-level bureaucrats and the implementation of public policy. In B. G. Peters, & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of Public Administration (pp. 245–259). Sage Publications.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Migration Integration Policy Index. (MIPEX). (2020, April). Sweden. http://www.mipex.eu/sweden
Google Scholar

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Sage.
Google Scholar

Mills, A. J., Durepos G., & Wiebe, E. (Eds.). (2010). Encyclopaedia of case study research. Sage Publications.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Misztal, B. A. (1996). Trust in modern society. Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Mügge, L., Kranendonk, M., Vermeulen, F., & Aydemir, N. (2021). Migrant votes ‘here’ and ‘there’: Transnational electoral behavior of Turks in the Netherlands. Migration Studies, 9(3), 400–422. https://doi. org/10.1093/migration/mnz034
Crossref
Google Scholar

Mukhtar, M., Dean, J., Wilson, K., Ghassemi, E., &Wilson, D. H. (2015). ‘But many of these problems are about funds…’: The challenges immigrant settlement agencies (ISAs) encounter in a suburban setting in Ontario, Canada. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 17(2), 389–408. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s12134-015-0421-5
Crossref
Google Scholar

Munns, A. K. (1995). Potential influence of trust on the successful completion of a project. International Journal of Project Management, 13(1), 19–24. https:// doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(95)95699-E
Crossref
Google Scholar

Nooteboom, B. (2007). Social capital, institutions and trust. Review of Social Economy, 65(1), 29–53. https:// doi.org/10.1080/00346760601132154
Crossref
Google Scholar

O’Reilly, K. (2009). Key concepts in ethnography. Sage Publications.
Crossref
Google Scholar

OECD (2014). Finding the way: A discussion of the Swedish migrant integration system. OECD Publishing.
Crossref
Google Scholar

OECD (2016). Working together: Skills and labour market integration of immigrants and their children in Sweden. OECD Publishing. https://doi. org/10.1787/9789264257382-en
Crossref
Google Scholar

Okojie, G., Ismail, IR., Begum, H., Ferdous Alam, ASA., & Sadik-Zada, ER. (2023) The mediating role of social support on the relationship between employee resilience and employee engagement. Sustainability, 15, 7950. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107950
Crossref
Google Scholar

Örkény, A. & Székelyi, S. (2009). The role of trust in the social integration of immigrants. Demográfi, 52(2), 124–147.
Google Scholar

Penninx, R. (2009). Decentralising integration policies: managing migration in cities, regions and localities. Policy Network.
Google Scholar

Penninx, R., & Garcés-Mascareñas, B. (2016). The concept of integration as an analytical tool and as a policy concept. In B. Garcés-Mascareñas & R. Penninx (Eds.), Integration processes and policies in Europe. Contexts, levels and actors (pp. 11–29). Springer.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Penninx, R., Spencer, D., & Van Hear, N. (2008). Migration and integration in Europe: The state of research. ESRC Centre on Migration, Policy and Society (COMPAS).
Google Scholar

Ponzo, I., Gidley, B., Roman, E., Tarantino, F., Pastore, F., & Jenson, O. (2013). Researching functioning policy practices in local integration in Europe: A conceptual and methodological discussion paper. ITCILO. https:// www.compas.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/PR-2013- EUMIA_Concepts_Methods.pdf
Google Scholar

Pressman, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation. University of California.
Google Scholar

Putnam, R. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x
Crossref
Google Scholar

Rathgeb Smith, S. (2003). Street-level bureaucracy and public policy. In, B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 354–376). Sage Publications.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Robinson, V. (1998, November). Defining and measuring successful refugee integration. Proceeding of ECRE International Conference on Integration of Refugees in Europe. Brussels: ECRE.
Google Scholar

Rothstein, B. & Stolle, D. (2001, September 15–20). Social capital and street-level bureaucracy: An institutional theory of generalized trust. Proceeding of Trust in Government Conference. Exeter, UK.
Google Scholar

Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35(4), 651–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-64961967/ tb01454.x
Crossref
Google Scholar

Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-disciplinary view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617
Crossref
Google Scholar

Serva, M. A., Fuller, M. A., & Mayer, R. C. (2005). The reciprocal nature of trust: A longitudinal study of interacting teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 625–648. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.331
Crossref
Google Scholar

Six, F. (2005). The trouble with trust – The dynamics of interpersonal trust building. Edward Elgar.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Six, F., & Skinner, D. (2010), Managing trust and trouble in interpersonal work relationships: evidence from two Dutch organizations. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190122933
Crossref
Google Scholar

Srivastava, A., & Thomson, S. B. (2009). Framework analysis: A qualitative methodology for applied policy research. Journal of Administration and Governance, 4(2), 72–79.
Google Scholar

Statista. (2023, May). Population in Sweden from 2012 to 2022, by birthplace. https://www.statista. com/statistics/1143161/sweden-population-bybirthplace/#:~:text=In%20other%20words%2C%20 foreign%2Dborn,highest%20number%20came%20 from%20Syria.
Google Scholar

Stolle, D., & Harell, A. (2012). Social capital and ethnoracial diversity: Learning to trust in an immigrant society. Political Studies Association, 61, 42–66. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00969.x
Crossref
Google Scholar

Tahvilzadeh, N. (2020) The political functions of development projects in the margins: Five propositions. In M. Dymitrow, & K. Ingelhag (Eds.), Anatomy of a 21st-century sustainability project: The untold stories (pp. 71–77). Chalmers University of Technology.
Google Scholar

Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2014). Policy implementation, street-level bureaucracy and the importance of discretion. Public Management Review, 16, 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841978
Crossref
Google Scholar

Verdicchio, M. (2017a, February 8). Gun Holmertz: “Ett helt absurt projekt”. Göteborgs-Posten.
Google Scholar

Verdicchio, M. (2017b, February 8). Satsar 32 miljoner – på svamp, getmjölk och hästgräsklippare. Göteborgs- -Posten.
Google Scholar

Wallace Goodman, S., & Wright, M. (2015.) Does mandatory integration matter? Effects of civic requirements on immigrant socio-economic and political outcomes. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(12), 1885–1908. https://doi.org/10.1080/13 69183X.2015.1042434
Crossref
Google Scholar

Wiesbrock, A. (2011). The integration of immigrants in Sweden: A model for the European Union. International Migration, 49(4), 48–66. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2010.00662.x
Crossref
Google Scholar

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Sage.
Google Scholar

Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interfirm and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9, 141–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ orsc.9.2.141
Crossref
Google Scholar

Zapata-Barrero, R. (2012). Integration immigration governance policies in Spain: A practical philosophy. In J. Friederes, & M. Burnstein (Eds.), International perspectives: Integration and inclusion (pp. 185–203). McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Crossref
Google Scholar