ZRÓŻNICOWANIE SZATY ROŚLINNEJ KĘPY KIKOLSKIEJ   I SFORMUŁOWANIE WSKAZAŃ NA POTRZEBY KSZTAŁTOWANIA SYSTEMU EKOLOGICZNEGO REGIONU

Beata Fornal-Pieniak

doi:10.31648/aspal.521

Published: 2018-09-051

Vol. 17 No. 3 (2018)

DIVERSIFICATION OF VEGETATION OF KĘPA KIKOLSKA AND FORMULATED DIRECTIONS FOR SHAPING OF ECOLOGICAL SYSTEM OF THIS REGION

Beata Fornal-Pieniak

Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.31648/aspal.521

Abstract

Vegetation is one of the most important component of the landscape and play important role in the ecological system of the region. The most valuable plant communities are represented by forests, water and rushes vegetation, peat bogs, which develop without human pressure. Nowadays the impact of human activity is noticeable in the natural environment, so it is important to recognize the values of existing vegetation, in order to preserve natural and semi-natural communities. This is possible to keep natural and seminatural vegetation if it will be formulated proper directions for landscape shaping with particular attention to nature refuges. This article presents the diversity of vegetation of Kępa Kikolska and to formulated directions for shaping the ecological system of this region.

Keywords:

vegetation cover, ecological system, nature refuges

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Fornal-Pieniak, B. (2018). DIVERSIFICATION OF VEGETATION OF KĘPA KIKOLSKA AND FORMULATED DIRECTIONS FOR SHAPING OF ECOLOGICAL SYSTEM OF THIS REGION. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum, 17(3), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.31648/aspal.521

Cited by / Share

References

Aggemyr, E., Cousins, S.A.O. (2012). Landscape structure and land use history influnece changes in island plant composition after 100 years. Journal of Biogeography 39, 1645–1656.
Amici, V., Rocchini, D., Filibeck, G., Bacaro, G., Santi, E., Geri, F., Landi, S., Scoppola, A., Chiarucci, A. (2015). Landscape structure effects on forest plant diversity of local scale: Exploring the role of spatial extent. Ecological Complexity 21, 44–52.
Braun-Blanquet, J. (1951). Pflanzensoziologie, 2 Aufl., Springer Verlang, Wien.
Brunet, J., Valtinat, K., Mayr, M.L., Felton, A., Lindbladh, M., Bruun, H.H. (2011). Understory succession in post-agricultural oak forests: habitat fragmentation affects forest specialists and generalists differently. Forest Ecology and Management 262, 1863–1871.
Brzank, M., Pawłat-Zawrzykraj, A. (2013). Struktura ekologiczna krajobrazu jako podstawa wyznaczenia sieci ekologicznej na przykładzie gminy Góra Kalwaria (Landscape ecological structure as the basis for development of an ecological network on the example of Góra Kalwaria Community). Inżynieria i Kształtowanie Środowiska, Prz. Nauk. Inż. Kszt.
Środ. 61, 262–272.
Dembek, W. (2012). Problemy ochrony polskiej przyrody w kontekście wspólnej polityki rolnej (Problems of nature protectionin Poland in the context of common agricultural policy). Woda–Środowisko–Obszary Wiejskie t. 12, 4(40), 109−121.
Fornal-Pieniak, B. Wysocki, C. (2010). Struktura ekologiczna krajobrazu gminy Ciężkowice (Landscape ecological structure of the Cieżkowice commune), Woda – Środowisko – Obszary Wiejskie t. 10, 4(32), 45−52.
Henny, J. Van Der Windt, J., Swart, A.A (2008). Ecological corridors, connecting science and politics: the case of the Green River in the Netherlands Journal of Applied Ecology, pp. 124–132.
Lundholm, J.T., Marlin, A. (2006). Habitat origins and microhabitat preferences of urban plant species. Urban Ecosystems 9, 139–159.
Matuszkiewicz, W. (2012). Przewodnik do oznaczania zbiorowisk roślinnych Polski (Guide to marking plant communities in Poland), PWN. Warszawa.
Matyjasiak, P. (2012). Metodyka waloryzacji przyrodniczej. Cz. II. Zastosowania w praktyce ocen oddziaływania przedsięwzięć na środowisko (Methods of valorization of natural resources. Part 2. Applications in the environmental impact assessment). Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae UKSW 10(4), 75–96.
MŚ 2014. Program ochrony i zrównoważonego użytkowania różnorodności biologicznej wraz z Planem działań na lata 2014–2020 (A program for the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, including an Action Plan for years 2014–2020), http:// www.mos.gov.pl/g2/big/2014_05/ef8371fe47d9a9bb3be69f50e55019fd.pdf, dostęp (access): 20.09.2013.
Pchałek, M., Adamski, A. (2010). Krytyka sztuki OOŚ – prawo vs. realia (Critique of the art of environmental impact assessment – law vs. reality) Probl. Ocen Środ 1(48), 139–141.
Pchałek, M., Kupczyk, P., Matyjasiak, P., Juchnik, A. (2011). Efektywność ochrony korytarzy ekologicznych. Koncepcja zmian legislacyjnych (Efficiency of protection of ecological corridors. The concept of legislative changes), WWF Polska, Warszawa.
Ratajczyk, N., Wolański-Kamiśki, A. (2013). Różnorodność biologiczna – stan, zagrożenia, metody ochrony, w: Prawo ochrony różnorodności biologicznej (Biodiversity – condition, threats, methods of protection, in: Protection of biodiversity). Pr. zbior. Red. M. Górski, J. Miłkowska-Rębowska. Warszawa. LEX Wolters Kluwer business, 212–234.
Underwood, J.G., Francis, J., Gerber, L.R. (2011). Incorporating biodiversity conservation and recreational wildlife values into smart growth land use planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 100, 136−143.
Wulf, M., Kolk, J. (2014). Plant species richness of very small forests related to patches configurations, quality, heterogenity and history. Journal of Vegetation Science 25, 1267–1277.
Wójcik, Z. (1991). The vegetation of forest islands in the agricultural landscape of the Jorka river reception basin in Masuraian Lakeland (north-east part of Poland). Ekologia Polska 39(4), 4.
Żarska, B., Fornal-Pieniak, B., Zaraś-Januszkiewicz, E. (2014). Landscape protection and planning. Selected issues. Wyd. SGGW.
Żarska, B. (2011). Ochrona Krajobrazu (Landscape protection). Wyd. SGGW. Google Scholar