Rozmowa jako nadrzędny gatunek komunikacji ustnej: od podstaw interakcyjnych do zastosowań dydaktycznych

Katarzyna Kurzawska

Poznań
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7072-3204


Аннотация

Conversation, while often perceived as an everyday communicative practice, is in fact the fundamental form of spoken language. This article examines it through four dimensions - interactional, social, didactic and formational - showing how it enables co-construction of meaning, regulation of relationships and development of communicative competence. Drawing on interactional linguistics, pragmatics and language education research, the study highlights both the structural complexity and the formative role of conversation across analogue and digital contexts. It argues that, thanks to its flexibility and reflexivity, conversation remains a key tool for teaching and developing communicative competence in a foreign or second language.

 


Ключевые слова:

communication, interaction, language didactics, pragmatics, digital environment


Austin, J.L. (1962), How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.   Google Scholar

Barraja-Rohan, A.-M. (2011), Using conversation analysis in the second language classroom to teach interactional competence. Language Teaching Research 15/4: 479–507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811412878.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Bernstein, B. (1975), Class, Codes and Control. Towards a theory of educational transmission. Vol. 3. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.   Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1991), Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.   Google Scholar

Bronckart, J.-P. (1996), Activité langagière, textes et discours. Lausanne: Delachaux et Niestlé.   Google Scholar

Brown, P./Levinson, S. (1987), Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Bruner, J. (1990), Acts of Meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.   Google Scholar

Canale, M. (1983), From Communicative Competence to Communicative Language Pedagogy. In: Richards, J. C./Schmidt, R.W. (eds.), Language and Communication. London: Longman, 2–14.   Google Scholar

Canale, M./Swain, M. (1980), Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing. Applied Linguistics 1/1: 1–47.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Dolz, J./Schneuwly, B. (1998), Pour un enseignement de l’oral. Initiation aux genres formels à l’école. Paris:Éditions Sociales Françaises.   Google Scholar

Filliettaz, L./Roulet, E. (2002), The Geneva model of discourse analysis: An interactionist and modular approach to discourse organization. Discourse Studies 4/3: 369–393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456020040030601.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Fraser, B. (1999), What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 31/7: 931–952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00101-5.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1967), Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Anchor Books.   Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1974), Frame Analysis. Boston: Northeastern University Press.   Google Scholar

Grice, H.P. (1975), Logic and conversation. W: Cole, P./Morgan, J.L. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 41–58.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Gumperz, J.J. (1982), Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1987), The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 2. Boston: Beacon Press.   Google Scholar

Hall, E.T. (1966), The Hidden Dimension. New York: Anchor Books.   Google Scholar

Heritage, J. (2012), Epistemics in action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45/1: 1–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Herring, S.C. (2007), A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@Internet 4, article 1.   Google Scholar

Hymes, D. (1972), On Communicative Competence. W: Pride, J.B./Holmes, J. (eds.), Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin: 269–293.   Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. (1960), Linguistics and poetics. W: Sebeok, T. (ed.), Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 350–377.   Google Scholar

Kasper, G./Wagner, J. (2014), Conversation analysis in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 34: 171–212.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (1990), Les interactions verbales. Vol. 1. Paris: Armand Colin.   Google Scholar

Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (1996), La conversation. Paris: Seuil.   Google Scholar

Kramsch, C. (1993), Context and Culture in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.   Google Scholar

Lave, J./Wenger, E. (1991), Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Levinson, S.C. (2013), Action formation and ascription. W: Sidnell, J./Stivers, T. (eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell: 103–130.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Little, D. (2007), Language Learner Autonomy: Some Fundamental Considerations Revisted Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 1/1: 14–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2167/illt040.0.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Mead, G.H. (1934), Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.   Google Scholar

Mondada, L. (2014), The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 65: 137–156.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Pekarek Doehler, S. (2018), Elaborations on L2 interactional competence: The development of L2 grammar-for-interaction. Classroom Discourse 9/1: 3–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1437759.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Pekarek Doehler, S./Pochon-Berger, E. (2015), The development of L2 interactional competence: evidence from turn-taking organization, sequence organization, repair organization and preference organization. W: Cadierno, T./Eskildsen, S.W. (eds.), Usage-Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton: 233–268.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Roulet, E. (1987), Variations sur la structure de l’échange langagier dans différentes situations d’interaction. Cahiers de linguistique française 9: 27–37.   Google Scholar

Sacks, H./Schegloff, E.A./Jefferson, G. (1974), A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50/4: 696–735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/412243.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Schegloff, E.A. (2007), Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Schegloff, E.A./Jefferson, G./Sacks, H. (1977), Preference for self-correction. Language 53/2: 361–382.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Schiffrin, D. (1987), Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Searle, J.R. (1969), Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Schneuwly, B./Dolz, J. (2009), Des objets enseignés en classe de français. Le travail de l’enseignant sur la rédaction de textes argumentatifs et sur les genres oraux. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes   Google Scholar

Seedhouse, P. (2004), The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.   Google Scholar

Sidnell, J./Stivers, T. (eds.) (2013), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Tottie, G. (1991), Conversational style in British and American English: The case of backchannels. W: Aijmer, K./Altenberg, B. (eds.), English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik. London: Longman: 254–271.   Google Scholar

Traverso, V. (1999), La conversation familière. Analyse pragmatique des interactions, Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.   Google Scholar

Vion, R. (2000), La communication verbale. Analyse des interactions. Paris: Hachette.   Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L.S. (1997), Pensée et langage. Paris: La Dispute.   Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978), Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.   Google Scholar

Walsh, S. (2006), Investigating Classroom Discourse. London: Routledge.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Walsh, S. (2011), Exploring Classroom Discourse: Language in Action. London/New York: Routledge.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Walther, J.B. (1996), Computer-mediated communication. Communication Research 23/1: 3–43.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Yngve, V.H. (1970), On getting a word in edgewise. W: Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society 70: 567–578.   Google Scholar

Young, R.F. (2008), Language and Interaction. London: Routledge.   Google Scholar


Опубликован
2026-06-26

##plugins.themes.libcom.cytowania##

Kurzawska, K. (2026). Rozmowa jako nadrzędny gatunek komunikacji ustnej: od podstaw interakcyjnych do zastosowań dydaktycznych. Acta Neophilologica, 1(XXVIII), 216–131. https://doi.org/10.31648/an.12468

Katarzyna Kurzawska 
Poznań
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7072-3204