Łagodzenie skutków zmiany klimatu a zasada nieszkodzenia


Abstrakt

Każdy przydział emisji prowadzi do przyznania praw emisyjnych opartych na sprawiedliwości dystrybutywnej (nawet jeśli taktyka była wcześniej zweryfikowana pod względem utylitaryzmu na poziomie filozoficznym). W konsekwencji podejście sprawiedliwości dystrybuowanej legitymizuje poziom emisji. Gdy konkretny poziom emisji zostaje uprawomocniony, o ile jest zgodny z ustanowionym budżetem emisji, w celu podziału uprawnień do emisji, w momencie , gdy poziom emisji osiągnął pewien niebezpieczny poziom pojawia się zrozumiała potrzeba zachowania funkcjonującego „zrównoważonego”  programu klimatycznego. Z perspektywy Foucaultowskiej archeologii wiedzy i w celu oceny epistemologii zmiany klimatu będzie możliwe podważenie możliwości przejścia z modelu definiowania norm prawa socjalnego na model łagodzenia skutków zmiany klimatu.

Słowa kluczowe

biosfera; prawo socjalne; ekologiczne prawo naturalne; zasada nieszkodzenia; zbrodnia przeciwko ludzkości; koncepcja harmonii; epistemologia sprawiedliwości; archeologia wiedzy

Anderson K. (2015), Duality in Climate Science, “Nature Geoscience” 8: 898–900.

AOSIS Alliance of Small Island States (2007), Male Declaration on the Human Dimension of Global Climate Change, URL= http://www.ciel.org/Publications/Male_Declaration_Nov07.pdf [accessed 21.05.2018].

Aristotle (2006), Nichomachean Ethics, Cambridge University Press, New York.

Baer P. (2013), The Greenhouse Development Rights Framework for Global Burden Sharing: Reflection on Principles and Prospects, “Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change” 4: 61–71.

Bodansky D. (1993), United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: A Commentary, “Yale Journal of International Law” 18: 451–558.

Bosselmann K. (2013), Grounding the Rule of Law, [in:] Rule of Law for Nature: New Dimensions and Ideas in Environmental Law, Ch. Voigt (ed.), Cambridge University Press, New York, doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337961.007.

Bratspies R.M. (2013), The Green Economy Will Not Build the Rule of Law for Nature, [in:] Rule of Law for Nature: New Dimensions and Ideas in Environmental Law, Ch. Voigt (ed.), Cambridge University Press, New York, doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337961.024.

Caldecott B. et al. (2015), Stranded Carbon Assets and Negative Emissions Technologies, “Stranded Assets Programme”, Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford, Working paper:1-36.

Caney S. (2005), Cosmopolitan Justice, Responsibility, and Global Climate Change, “Leiden Journal of International Law” 18: 747–775.

Caney S. (2012), Just Emissions, “Philosophy & Public Affairs” 40: 255–300.

Caney S. (2014), Two Kinds of Climate Justice: Avoiding Harm and Sharing Burdens, “Journal of Political Philosophy” 22: 125–149.

Canto-Sperber M., Ogien R. (2006), La Philosophie Morale, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.

Christiansen S.M. (2016), Climate Conflicts-A Case of International Environmental and Humanitarian Law, Springer, eBook.

Ciais, P. et al. (2013), Carbon and Other Biogeochemical Cycles, [in:] Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, T.F. Stocker et al. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK), New York (USA).

Clarke L. et al. (2014), Assessing Transformation Pathways. [in:] Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, O. Edenhofer et al. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York.

Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC (2013), Guidelines for the Preparation of National Communications by Parties Included in Annex I to the Convention, Part I: UNFCCC Reporting Guidelines on Annual Greenhouse Gas Inventories, FCCC/CP/2013/10/Add.3.

Crutzen P. J. (2006), The Anthropocene, [in:] Earth System Science in the Anthropocene, E. Ehlers, T. Krafft (eds.), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26590-2_3

Cullinan C. (2013), The Rule of Nature’s Law, [in:] Rule of Law for Nature: New Dimensions and Ideas in Environmental Law, Ch. Voigt (ed.), Cambridge University Press, New York, doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337961.008.

Ewald F. (1985), Justice, Egalité, Jugement, [in:] L’Egalité, “Cahiers de philosophie politique et juridique de l'Université de Caen” 8: 219–244.

Ewald F. (1994), L’État Providence, Grasset, Paris.

Fisher P.B. (2011), Shifting Global Climate Governance: Creating Long-Term Goals through UNFCCC Article 2, “Portal Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies” 8: 2–30

Foucault M. (1994), The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, Vintage Books, New York.

France’s National Constituent Assembly (1789), Declaration Human and of Civic Rights, Conseil Constitutionnel, Paris. URL = https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/sites/default/files/as/root/bank_mm/anglais/cst2.pdf [accessed 10.03.2017].

Fuss S. et al. (2014), Betting on Negative Emissions, “Nature Climate Change” 4: 850–853.

Gupta J. (2006), International Law and Climate Change: The Challenges Facing Developing Countries, “Yearbook of International Environmental Law” 16: 119–153.

IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1997), Stabilization of Atmospheric Greenhouse Gases: Physical, Biological and Socio-Economic Implications, D. Schimel et al. (authors), J. T. Houghton et al. (eds.), WMO & UNEP, URL = https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/technical-papers/paper-III-en.pdf [accessed 11.03.2017]

IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2006), IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Volume 1: General Guidance and Reporting, Introduction to the 2006 Guidelines, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, H.S. Eggleston et al. (eds.), Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Japan.

Knox J.H. (2016), Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Issue of Human Rights Obligations Relating to the Enjoyment of a Safe, Clean, Healthy and Sustainable Environment, Human Rights Council Thirty-First Session, A/HRC/31/52: 1–21.

Le Quéré C. et al. (2016), Global Carbon Budget 2016, “Earth Syst. Sci. Data” 8: 605–649. doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-605-2016.

Le Quéré C., Dlugokencky E. et al., Global Carbon Budget 2017, URL = http://www.globalcarbonproject.org/carbonbudget/17/data.htm [accessed 27.10.2018].

Meinshausen M. (2006), What Does a 2 C Target Mean for Greenhouse Gas Concentrations? A Brief Analysis Based on Multi-Gas Emission Pathways and Several Climate Sensitivity Uncertainty Estimates, [in:] Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change, J.S. Schellnhuber et al. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, New York.

Meinshausen M. et al. (2009), Greenhouse-Gas Emission Targets for Limiting Global Warming to 2° C, “Nature” 458: 1158–1162.

NOAA National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (2018a), The NOAA Annual Greenhouse Gas Index, URL = http://esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/aggi/aggi.html [accessed 27.10.2018].

NOAA National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (2018b), Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide, Earth System Research Laboratory, URL = https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/index.html [accessed 27.10.2018].

Nilsson A.K. (2013), Enforcing Environmental Responsibilities: An Environmental Perspective on the Rule of Law and Administrative Enforcement, [in:] Rule of Law for Nature: New Dimensions and Ideas in Environmental Law, Ch. Voigt (ed.), Cambridge University Press, New York.

Oppenheimer M., Petsonk A. (2005), Article 2 of the UNFCCC: Historical Origins, Recent Interpretations, “Climatic Change” 73(3): 195–226.

Ott, K. et al. (2004), Reasoning Goals of Climate Protection. Specification of Art. 2 UNFCCC, Federal Environmental Agency (Umweltbundesamt), Berlin.

Pacala S.W. (2010), Verifying Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Methods to Support International Climate Agreements, Committee on Methods for Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Academies of Sciences, Washington D.C.: 1–110.

Piguet F.-P. (2014), Justice Climatique et Interdiction de Nuire, Globethics, Geneva, URL = https://www.globethics.net/documents/4289936/13403260/GE_Theses_11_online.pdf [accessed 21.02.2017].

Piguet F.-P. (2016), Justice Climatique et Principe d’Interdiction de Nuire : L’Apport Décisif de l’Interactionnisme Épistémologique, [in:] Interactionnisme et Normes: Approche Transdisciplinaire, E. Picavet & E. Jeuland (eds.), Editions de l’Institut de Recherche Juridique de la Sorbonne (IRJS), Paris.

Rawls J. (1999), Theory of Justice: Revised Edition, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

Rideout C. (2008), Storytelling, Narrative Rationality, and Legal Persuasion, “The Journal

of the Legal Writing Institute” 14: 53–86, URL = http://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/faculty/315 [accessed 23.01.2017].

Rideout C. (2013), Twice-Told Tale: Plausibility and Narrative Coherence in Judicial Storytelling, “Legal Communication & Rhetoric” 10: 67–88.

Robiou du Pont Y. et al. (2017), Equitable Mitigation to Achieve the Paris Agreement Goals, “Nature Climate Change” 7: 38–43.

Rogelj J. et al. (2015), Energy System Transformations for Limiting End-of-Century Warming to below 1.5 [Deg] C, “Nature Climate Change” 5: 519–27.

Rummukainen M. (2015), Our Commitment to Climate Change Is Dependent on Past, Present and Future Emissions and Decisions, “Climate Research”, 64(1): 7–14.

Schellnhuber H. J. et al. (2016), Why the Right Climate Target Was Agreed in Paris, “Nature Climate Change” 6: 649–53.

Shue H. (2014), Transboundary Damage in Climate Change: Criteria for Allocating Responsibility, Amsterdam Center for International Law (ACIL) of the University of Amsterdam, “Shares Research Paper” 45: 1–20.

Smith P. et al. (2013), How Much Land‐based Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Can Be Achieved Without Compromising Food Security and Environmental Goals? “Global Change Biology” 19, 2285–2302.

Snyder C.W. (2016), Evolution of Global Temperature over the Past Two Million Years, “Nature” 538: 226–228, doi:10.1038/nature19798.

Stocker, T.F. et al. (2013), Technical Summary, [in:] Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, T.F. Stocker et al. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York.

Thomas d'Aquin (2000), Somme Théologique, CERF, Paris, vol. I-IV.

United Nations (1948), The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Resolution 217 A.

United Nations (1972), Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1.

United Nations (1982), World Charter for Nature, A/RES/37/7.

United Nations (1992a), Framework Convention on Climate Change, GE.05-62220 (E) 200705.

United Nations (1992b), Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. I).

United Nations (2012), The Future We Want, Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 27 July 2012: A/RES/66/288, 53.

United Nations (2015a), Paris Agreement, FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1.

United Nations (2015b), Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda For Sustainable Development, Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015: A/RES/70/1,

United Nations Environment Programme (2015), The Emissions Gap Report: A UNEP Synthesis Report, URL = http://uneplive.unep.org/media/docs/theme/13/EGR_2015_301115_lores.pdf [accessed 21.02.2017].

US Congress (1776), Declaration of Independence, URL = https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript [accessed 21.02.2017].

Van Parijs P. (1991), Qu’est-ce qu’une Société Juste ? Introduction à la Pratique de la Philosophie Politique, Seuil, Paris.

Van Vuuren D. P. et al. (2013), The Role of Negative CO2 Emissions for Reaching 2° C—Insights from Integrated Assessment Modelling, “Climatic Change, 118: 15–27, doi 10.1007/s10584-012-0680-5.

Voigt C. (2013), The Principle of Sustainable Development: Integration and Ecological Integrity, [in:] Rule of Law for Nature: New Dimensions and Ideas in Environmental Law, Voigt C. (ed.), Cambridge University Press, New York, doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337961.012.

Watson R. T. et al. (1992), Greenhouse Gases: Sources and Sinks, [in:] Climate Change 1992: The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment, J.T. Houghton et al. (eds.), WMO, UNEP & IPCC, Cambridge, New York, and Victoria: 25–46.

Weisbach D. (2011), Negligence, Strict Liability, and Responsibility for Climate Change, “Iowa Law Rev.” 97: 521–565.

Opublikowane : 2018-12-20


Piguet, F.-P. (2018). Łagodzenie skutków zmiany klimatu a zasada nieszkodzenia. Humanistyka I Przyrodoznawstwo, (24), 49-85. https://doi.org/10.31648/hip.2597

Frédéric-Paul Piguet  fppiguet@institutbiosphere.ch
Instytut Biosfery, Genewa; Uniwersytet w Lozannie, Wydział Geologii i Środowiska  Szwajcaria




Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Teksty zaproponowane do "Humanistyki i Przyrodoznawstwa" nie powinny być nigdzie wcześniej publikowane. Wraz z przesłaniem tekstu redakcji Autor akceptuje, że w momencie zakwalifikowania tekstu do publikacji nasze czasopismo będzie stosowało licencję the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC). Na podstawie tej licencji autorzy zgadzają się, że ich prace mogą być zgodnie z prawem ponownie wykorzystywane do jakichkolwiek celów, za wyjątkiem celów komercyjnych, bez konieczności uzyskania uprzedniej zgody ze strony autora lub wydawcy. Każdy może prace te czytać, pobierać, kopiować, drukować, rozpowszechniać oraz przetwarzać, pod warunkiem poprawnego oznaczenia autorstwa oraz oryginalnego miejsca publikacji. Autorzy zachowują prawa autorskie do swoich utworów bez żadnych innych ograniczeń. Pełna informacja na temat licencji CC BY-NC

Oświadczenie autora do pobrania