Application of the 6D Hofstede Model in an Analysis of the Polish and Portuguese Business Culture
Marek Siemiński
Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztynhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5471-3511
Katarzyna Andruszkiewicz
Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury in OlsztynTiago Pinho
Escola Superior de Ciências Empresariais, Polytechnic Institute of SetubalRésumé
Business management in a culturally diverse environment, that is acting in different business cultures, is one of the major challenges facing managers nowadays. Cultural differences among societies have been known to exist for ages, but a holistic view of their impact on the business culture in particular countries, development of cultural typologies and studies into the nature of interactions between the business and organisational culture date back to the 1980s. The acceleration of social, technological and demographic changes, a more rapid process of globalisation as well as some disturbances, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the war in Ukraine or the intensifying rivalry between China and the United States of America, increase organisational uncertainty. Such changes require a new cultural sensitivity as well as new, modified systems of values. The objective of this study has been to determine and compare the Polish and Portuguese business cultures. To this end, the contemporary Polish and Portuguese business cultures have been analysed according to the 6D Hofstede model.
Mots-clés :
organisational culture, business culture, 6D Hofstede modelRéférences
Adamovic, M. (2022). How Does Employee Cultural Background Influence the Effects of Telework on Job Stress? The Roles of Power Distance, Individualism, and Beliefs about Telework. International Journal of Information Management, 62, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102437
Crossref
Google Scholar
Alipour, A. (2021). What Matters for the Future? Comparing Globe’s Future Orientation with Hofstede’s Long-term Orientation. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 28(4), 734-759. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-08-2020-0163
Crossref
Google Scholar
Alipour, A., & Yaprak, A. (2022). Indulgence and Risk-Taking Behavior of Firms: Direct and Interactive Influences. Journal of International Management, 28(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2022.100945
Crossref
Google Scholar
Beugelsdijk, S., & Welzel, C. (2018). Dimensions and Dynamics of National Culture: Synthesizing Hofstede with Inglehart. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(10), 1469-1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022118798505
Crossref
Google Scholar
Chudnovskaya, E., & O’Hara, L.L.S. (2022). Indulgence Versus Restraint: Exploration of A New Cultural Dimension in Context. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 22(2), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v22i2.54
Crossref
Google Scholar
Country Comparison. 2022. Hofstede Insights. Retrieved from www.hofstede-insights.com/countrycomparison/ (11.08.2022). Google Scholar
Dauber, D., Fink, G., & Yolles, M. (2012). A Configuration Model of Organizational Culture. SAGE Open, 2(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012441482
Crossref
Google Scholar
Escandon-Barbosa, D., Salas-Paramo, J., & Rialp-Criado, J. (2021). Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions as a Moderator of the Relationship between Ambidextrous Learning and Corporate Sustainability in Born Global Firms. Sustainability, 13, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137344
Crossref
Google Scholar
Esteves, J., Pastor, J., & Carvalho, J. (2003). Organizational and National Issues of an ERP Implementation in a Portuguese Company. In Korpela, M., Montealegre, R., & Poulymenakou, A. (Ed.). Organizational Information System in the Context of Globalization. New York: Springer Science, Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35695-2
Crossref
Google Scholar
Heydari, A., Laroche, M., Paulin, M., & Richard, M-O. (2021). Hofstede’s Individual-Level Indulgence Dimension: Scale Development and Validation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 62, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102640
Crossref
Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks: CA SAGE. Google Scholar
Honrado, M.G. (2020). A liderança, as equipas e as novas formas de organização do trabalho. In: Figueira L.M., & Oosterbeek L. Turismo Mundial, Crise Sanitária e Futuro: visões globais partilhadas. Tomar: Instituto Politécnico de Tomar, p. 65-77. Google Scholar
Iliescu, M-E. (2019). The Cultural Influence on Designing the Homepage: Romanian vs. Portuguese Businesses Comparison. In C. Brătianu, A. Zbuchea, B. Hrib, A. Vițelar, & F. Anghel (Eds.). Upscaling Digital Transformation in Business and Economics. STRATEGICA International Academic Conference, Bucharest, Romania, October 10-11. Google Scholar
Jacques, E. (1952). The Changing Culture of a Factory. New York: Dryden Press. Google Scholar
Kassem, R., Ajmal, M., Gunasekaran, A., & Helo, P. (2019). Assessing the Impact of Organizational Culture on Achieving Business Excellence with a Moderating Role of ICT: An SEM Approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(1), 117-146. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-03-2018-0068
Crossref
Google Scholar
Lee, H-S., Chernikov, SU., Nagy, S., & Degtereva, EA. (2022). The Impact of National Culture on Innovation: A Comparative Analysis between Developed and Developing Nations during the Pre- and Post-Crisis Period 2007–2021. Social Sciences, 11(11), 522. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11110522
Crossref
Google Scholar
Kozłowski, W. (2020). Employee Motivation as Element as an Element of the Development Process in an Enterprise. Olsztyn Economic Journal, 15(3), 205-2013. https://doi.org/10.31648/oej.6539
Crossref
Google Scholar
Küçükkömürler, S., & Özkan, T. (2022). Political Interest Across Cultures: The Role of Uncertainty Avoidance and Trust. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 91, 88-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.09.004
Crossref
Google Scholar
Mihut, I., & Lungescu, D. (2006). Cultural Dimensions in the Romanian Management. Management & Marketing, 1, 5-26. Google Scholar
Niedzielski, E. (2019). Changes in the Labour Market and their Consequences. Olsztyn Economic Journal, 14(2), 157-163. https://doi.org/10.31648/oej.3968
Crossref
Google Scholar
Pukin, P. (2020). Dimensions of Culture and the Suze of the Shadow Economy in the Member of the European Union? Olsztyn Economic Journal, 15(2), 167-173. https://doi.org/10.31648/oej.5839
Crossref
Google Scholar
Pikhart, M., & Koblizkova, A. (2017). The Central Role of Politeness in Business Communication: The Appropriateness Principle as the Way to Enhance Business Communication Efficiency. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 45, 1-21. Google Scholar
Saha, A., & Nanda, N. (2022). Understanding Individual Cultural Values: A Validation Test of Power Distance, Masculinity, and Long-Term Orientation in Indian Service Industry. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(4), 10662-10668. Google Scholar
Schein, E.H. (2004). Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Google Scholar
Schlemenson, A. (2005). An Innovative Approach to the Theory and Practice of Organizational Analysis: My Journey with Elliott Jaques. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 2(4), 345-364. https://doi.org/10.1002/aps.25
Crossref
Google Scholar
Sent, E-M., & Kroese, A.L.K. (2022). Commemorating Geert Hofstede, a Pioneer in the Study of Culture and Institution. Journal of Institutional Economics, 18, 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413742000051X
Crossref
Google Scholar
Siemiński, M., Wędrowska, E., & Krukowski, K. (2020). Cultural Aspect of Social Responsibility Implementation in SMEs. European Research Studies Journal, 23(3), 68-84. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/1625
Crossref
Google Scholar
Siemiński, M. (2020). Kulturowe uwarunkowania społecznej odpowiedzialności mikro, małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw. Olsztyn: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego. Google Scholar
Sienkiewicz, Ł. (2022). Cultural Determination of Evidence-Based Human Resources Management: A Cross-Country Analysis, Organization and Management Series, 160, 527-544. http://dx.doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2022.160.34
Crossref
Google Scholar
Soni, M.S., Jhajharia, P., & Nag, M.B. (2022). Role of Organizational Culture in Driving Employee Engagement: An Empirical Study of a Leading Two-Wheeler Indian Manufacturing Company. Specialusis Ugdymas, 1(43), 7030-7045. Google Scholar
Su, Ch. (2022). Geert Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Theory and Its Implications in SLA. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 5(14), 57-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2022.05141
Crossref
Google Scholar
Sun, J., Kim, S., & Zhao, F. (2022). Mathematical Modeling of Optimal Allocation of Remote Workforce: An Interdisciplinary Investigation with Hofstede’s Cultural Factors and Managerial Ability. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-10-2021-0184 Google Scholar
Triandis, H.C., & Gelfand, M.J. (2012). A Theory of Individualism and Collectivism. In P.A.M. Van Lange, A.W. Kruglanski, & E.T. Higgins (Ed.). Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, p. 498-520.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5471-3511
Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn
Escola Superior de Ciências Empresariais, Polytechnic Institute of Setubal
Licence
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
An Author declares that his paper has not been published before (under the same or another title, or is a part of another publication) and does not infringe copyrights of other persons**. At the same time, the Author transfers to the Publisher the exclusive right to publish and to circulate this work in print in the form of a non-serial journal publication and in a form of an electronic publication.
The journal is available on Creative Common license CC-BY-NC-ND