Intertextuality reception in postmodernist discourse

Andrey N. Bezrukov

Birsk State University


Abstrakt

The main study subject of the article is intertextual postmodern text interaction with the legacy of Russian classics of XIX–XX centuries. A cultural dialogue being a semantic point of convergence of the text factual and ideological levels is in the focus of investigation. The purpose of the research undertaken is observation of the postmodern artistic unity transformational nature, represented by the projection of systemic/non-systemic writing/ /reading. Methodologically, the work is based on the receptive approach to identification of individual features of the text and its semantic correlates. The analysis allowed us to direct attention to intertextual variations, discursive imagery circumvolutions, presence of parallel and reverse vectors in the newly created texts. The concepts of the intertextual matrix situation put across are illustrated with the fictional examples (Pushkin, Dostoevsky, Yerofeyev). The article is intended (field of application) for the Russian and foreign researchers of the postmodern discourse, intertextual communication, literary forms dialogue, signimic level text transformed into a semantic construct. The analysis results posit that formal intertextuality character (citation scale) in the individual text concept expands to the phenomenon, bearing convergent characteristics, and the semantic field extension can be carried out with the help of the receptive approach.


Słowa kluczowe:

intertext     postmodernism     reception of the text     discourse     dialogue     interpretation,     intertextuality     Alexander Pushkin     Venedikt Yerofeyev


Arnold, I. V. [= Арнольд, И. В.] (1999), Семантика. Стилистика. Интертекстуальность. Санкт-Петербург.

Bakhtin, M. M. [= Бахтин, М. М.] (2002), Собрание сочинений. Т. 6. Москва.

Barthes, R. (1987), Criticism and truth. London.

Bezrukov, A. N. [= Безруков, А. Н.] (2009), Смысловое формирование в системе дискурса. В: Czapiga, A./Czapiga, Z. (red.), Коммуникативные аспекты грамматики и текста. Rzeszow, 289–299.

Bezrukov, A. N. [= Безруков, А. Н.] (2015), Рецепция художественного текста: функциональный подход. Вроцлав.

Bezrukov, A. N. [= Безруков, А. Н.] (2016), Детерминация смысла «Благой вести» Вен.

Ерофеева с позиций теории рецепции. В: Polilog. Studia Neofilologiczne. VI, 69–78.

Derrida, J. (1978), Writing and Difference. London.

Eco, U. (1984), Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Bloomington.

Genette, G. (1997), Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree. Lincoln.

Graham, A. (2000), Intertextuality. London.

Graham, A. (2003), Roland Barthes. London.

Greimas, A.J. (1983), Structural Semantics: An Attempt at a Method. Lincoln.

Guattari, F. (2013), Schizoanalytic cartographies. London.

Fateeva, N. A. [= Фатеева, Н. А.] (2007), Интертекст в мире текстов: контрапункт интертекстуальности. Москва.

Holquist, M. (1990), Dialogism: Bakhtin and His World. London.

Iser, W. (1976), The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore.

Jameson, F. (2002), A Singular Modernity. Essay on the Ontology of the Present. London.

Jauss, H.-R. (1982), Aesthetic experience and literary hermeneutics. Minneapolis.

Jauss, H.-R. (1982), Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. Minneapolis.

Kiebuzinska, C. (2001), Intertextual loops in modern drama. Madison.

Kiklewicz, A. (2015), О коммуникативно-прагматических аспектах многозначности (2). В: Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski. VI/1, 167–179.

Korman, B. O. [= Корман, Б. О.] (2006), Теория литературы: избранные труды. Ижевск.

Kristeva, J. (1984), Revolution in Poetic Language. New York.

Kristeva, J. [= Кристева, Ю.] (2004), Избранные труды: Разрушение поэтики. Москва.

Lipovetsky, M. N. (1999), Russian Postmodernist Fiction : Dialogue with Chaos. London.

Piégay-Gros, N. [= Пьеге-Гро, Н.] (2008), Введение в теорию интертекстуальности. Москва.

Pushkin, A. S. [= Пушкин, А. С.] (1993), Собрание сочинений. Т. 2. Санкт-Петербург.

Smirnov, I. P. [= Смирнов, И. П.] (1995), Порождение интертекста (Элементы интертекстуального анализа с примерами из творчества Б. Л. Пастернака). Санкт-Петербург.

Yampolskii, M. B. [= Ямпольский, М. Б.] (1993), Память Тиресия. Интертекстуальность и кинематограф. Москва.

Yerofeyev, V. V. [= Ерофеев, В. В.] (2001), Собрание сочинений. T. 1. Москва.

Opublikowane
01.11.2018

Cited By /
Share

Bezrukov, A. N. (2018). Intertextuality reception in postmodernist discourse. Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski, 8(2), 263–271. https://doi.org/10.31648/pw.3585

Andrey N. Bezrukov 
Birsk State University