Language Skills and Thinking in Children Aged 6‒10 Years. Research Report

Rosemary J.W.B Sage

The UK Learning for Life Trust
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4916-9547

Luke D. Sage

University of Loughborough, UK, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2911-4218


Abstrakt

Aim: Language and thinking play a key role in human interactions. Their quality is deteriorating as conversations are replaced by technology (Sage, 2020). This, in turn, raises problems in communication and relationship building, reduces work efficiency and contributes to a decline in personal and professional standards. The aim of the research presented here was to determine how thinking and expressive language skills are formed in school-aged children in the East Midlands region of England and to see if these abilities improved after a year of study.

Method: 102 children aged 6‒10 took part in the study, which involved four tasks: two pictorial and two involving story-telling. Structured in this way, the study was designed to stimulate thinking and linguistic expression and to elicit narratives, reflecting the generation of ideas in response to visual and auditory stimuli. The study was conducted in two stages: a group of children was first examined in 2022, and the study was repeated in 2023. The t statistic for dependent samples was used to assess the significance of differences.

Results: Significant differences were found, indicating improvements in narrative skills with the introduction of story-telling activities. In contrast, language and thinking skills remained stable but low.

Conclusions: Retest revealed a lack of significant differences between means of  thinking ability and linguistic expressions. After a year of working with students, the level of their imagination and thinking flexibility has not improved. These abilities are crucial to the development of creative thinking and imagination and, consequently, to the overall development and success of the individual. On the other hand, there was an improvement in narrative competence, which is an important part of developing social interaction.


Słowa kluczowe:

thinking, imagination, language and social competence, progressive change


Benda, J. (2021). Treason of the intellectuals. Eris.   Google Scholar

Bertling, J., Rojas, N., Alegre, J., & Faherty, K. (2020, 14 October). A tool to capture learning experiences during COVID-19. The PISA Global Crises Questionnaire Module. OECD Education Working Paper, 232. https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9988df4e-en
Crossref   Google Scholar

Dasen, P. (1994). Culture and cognitive development from a Piagetian perspective. In W. J. Lonner & R. S. Malpass (Eds.), Psychology and culture (pp. 145–149). Allyn and Bacon.   Google Scholar

Di Caro, B. (2021). Global Technology Governance Summit. GYGS21 WEF.   Google Scholar

Dolcos, S., & Albarracin, D. (2014). The inner speech of behavioral regulation: Intentions and task performance strengthen when you talk to yourself as a You. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(6), 636–642. https://doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2048
Crossref   Google Scholar

Gazzaniga, M., Ivry, R., & Mangun, G. (2019). Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of Mind. W. W. Norton & Company   Google Scholar

Glendinning, I. (2022). Academic integrity. Research from world studies. In R. Sage & R. Matteucci (Eds.), How the world is changing education. Brill Academic Publishers https://www.newstatesman.com/spotlight/2020/02/i-teacher-ai-and-school-transformation
Crossref   Google Scholar

Hurlburt, R., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2007). Describing inner experience? Proponent Meets Skeptic. MIT Press.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Kaczmarek, B., & Chong Espino, J. (2024). Overcoming framed thinking: Education or culture? In R. Sage & R. Matteucci (Eds.), Life challenges, diverse identities and creative solutions (pp. 23–39). Nova Science Publishers.   Google Scholar

Kaczmarek, B. L. J., & Markiewicz, K. (2003) The real nature of the restricted code. In B. D. MacQueen & M. Pąchalska (Eds.), Society as text in the thought of Richard Harvey Brown (pp. 75–85). Wydawnictwo Continuo.   Google Scholar

Kaczmarek, B. L. J., & Stencel, M. (2018). Third mode of thinking. The New Educational Review, 53(3), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2018.53.3.24
Crossref   Google Scholar

Kaczmarek, B. L. J., Stencel, M., & Łukasiewicz, J. (2017). Mathematical reasoning and the form of a task. Horyzonty Psychologii [The Horizons of Psychology], 7, 7–18.   Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.   Google Scholar

Keating, D. (1979). Teenage thinking. In J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 211–246). Wiley.   Google Scholar

Lukianoff, G., & Haidt, J. (2018). The coddling of the American mind: how good intentions and bad ideas are setting up a generation for failure. Penguin Publishing Group.   Google Scholar

Mahon, A. (2023). Opening speech by Convention Chair and Channel 4 CEO Alex Mahon | RTS Cambridge Convention 2023. https://rts.org.uk/article/opening-speech-convention-chair-and-channel-4-ceo-alex-mahon-rts-cambridge-convention-2023   Google Scholar

Murnikov, V., & Kask, K. (2021). Recall accuracy in children: Age vs. conceptual thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 686904. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686904
Crossref   Google Scholar

Osmond, H. (2023, 24 September). Most of my staff are Gen-Z snowflakes but it's not their fault. Blame the universities and schools who fill their heads with nonsense. Daily Mail Online. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-12553151/HUGH-OSMOND-staff-Gen-Z-snowflakes-not-fault-Blame-universities-schools-heads-nonsense.html   Google Scholar

Parsons, S., & Branagan, A. (2016). Language for thinking. A structured approach for young children. Routledge.   Google Scholar

Pavese, C. (2021). Knowledge and mentality. Epistemology, 35(1), 359‒382. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12150
Crossref   Google Scholar

Radatz, H. (1984). Schwierigkeiten der Anwendung Arithmetischen Wissens am Beispiel des Sachrechnens. In J. H. Lorenz (Ed.), Lernschwierigkellw Forschung und Praxis. Untersuchungen zum Mathematikunterricht (pp. 17–29). Universitat Bielefeld.   Google Scholar

Reusser, K. (1988). Problem solving beyond the logic of things: contextual effects on understanding and solving word problems. Instructional Science, 17, 309–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056219
Crossref   Google Scholar

Richardson, N., & Antonello, M. (2023). People at Work 2023: A Global Workforce View. ADP Research Institute. https://www.adpri.org/assets/people-at-work-2023-a-global-workforce-view/   Google Scholar

Sage, R. (1986). A question of language disorder: Report on children failing school. Trent Region. Medical Research Council.   Google Scholar

Sage, R. (2020). Speechless: Understanding for Education. Buckingham University Press.   Google Scholar

Sage, R., & Matteucci, R. (2022). How World Events Are Changing Education. Politics, Education, Social, Technology. Brill Academic Publishers.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Sage, R., & Matteucci, R. (2024). Technology and Learning. Issues Vital to Address. Brill Academic Publisher.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Sage, R. J. W. B., Sage, L. D., & Kaczmarek, B. L. J. (2023). A UK study of thinking and language expression. The New Educational Review, 71, 90–100. DOI: 10.15804/tner.23.71.1.07
Crossref   Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge University Press.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Wisdom and Education. Gifted Education International, 17(3), 233‒248. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142940301700304
Crossref   Google Scholar

Tam, G., & El-Azar, D. (2020, 13 March). 3 ways the coronavirus pandemic could reshape education. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/03/3-ways-coronavirus-is-reshaping-education-and-what-changes-might-be-here-to-stay/   Google Scholar

United Nations. (2020, September). The future we want: The United Nations we need. Update on the work of the Office for the Commemoration of the 75th Anniversary of the United Nations. https://report.un75.online/files/report/un75-report-september-en.pdf   Google Scholar

Wallace-Stephens, F., & Morgante, E. (2020). Who is at risk? Work and automation in times of Covid-19. RSA. https://www.thersa.org/globalassets/_foundation/new-site-blocks-and-images/reports/2020/10/work_and_automation_in_time_of_covid_report.pdf   Google Scholar

World Bank Group. (2019). Educational crisis: Being in school is not the same as learning. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/immersive-story/2019/01/22/pass-or-fail-how-can-the-world-do-its-homework   Google Scholar


Opublikowane
2024-12-20

Cited By /
Share

Sage, R. J., & Sage, L. D. (2024). Language Skills and Thinking in Children Aged 6‒10 Years. Research Report. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 67(3), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.31648/przegldpsychologiczny.10494

Rosemary J.W.B Sage 
The UK Learning for Life Trust
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4916-9547
Luke D. Sage 
University of Loughborough, UK, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2911-4218