Determinants of Interpreting Difficult Classroom Situations by Young People with Mild Intellectual Disability – Case Study Analysis

Paweł Kurtek

Jan Kochanowski University, Department of Psychology
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2149-6175


Abstrakt

Aim: Effective coping in difficult classroom situations involving peers requires gaining proper social insight. Limited abilities to process information by persons with MID (mild intellectual disability) may undermine the process of causal attribution especially in the context of stressful situations, which most often leads to defensive attribution when the cause for an event is assigned to negative dispositions of the peer. The aim of this paper is to verify the regulatory role of determinants of causal attribution in persons with mild/moderate intellectual disability, proposed as part of the Kelley’s cube model.

Method: Case studies were analysed using the phenomenological, qualitative research approach.

Results: Interviews conducted with 12 students with MID aged 18 to 24 years showed that low distinctiveness of the subject’s negative behaviour, with simultaneous low consensus and comparison-object consensus of this behaviour, promotes attribution of the cuse to the perpetrator (negative subject). Low consistency of peer’s negative behaviour on the other hand, with comparison-object consensus of this behaviour across the group, fosters situational attribution. 

Conclusion: The paper ends with the summary and discussion of results, as well as indication of study limitations.


Słowa kluczowe:

causal attribution, mild intellectual disability, coping with difficult social situations


Alvarez-Couto, M. (2024). Challenging Behaviors in Adults with Intellectual Disabilities and ASD: Related Variables. In G. Bennett & E. Goodall (Eds.), The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Disability (pp. 1–12). Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40858-8_63-1
Crossref   Google Scholar

Brown, J., & Beail, N. (2009). Self-harm among people with intellectual disabilities living in secure service provision: A qualitative exploration. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 22(6), 503–513. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1468-3148.2009.00504.x
Crossref   Google Scholar

Clarkson, R., Murphy, G. H., Coldwell, J. B., & Dawson, D. L. (2009). What characteristics do service users with intellectual disability value in direct support staff within residential forensic services? Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 34(4), 283–289. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250903285630
Crossref   Google Scholar

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Projektowanie badań naukowych. Metody jakościowe, ilościowe i mieszane [Designing scientific research: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.   Google Scholar

Davies, B., Griffiths, J., Liddiard, K., Lowe, K., & Stead, L. (2015). Changes in staff confidence and attributions for challenging behaviour after training in positive behavioural support within a forensic medium secure service. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 26(6), 847–861. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2015.1072574
Crossref   Google Scholar

Duperouzel, H., & Fish, R. (2010). Hurting no-one else’s body but your own: People with intellectual disability who self injure in a forensic service. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 23(6), 606–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.2010.00559.x
Crossref   Google Scholar

Falk, K., & Sansour, T. (2024). Self-Concept and Achievement in Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities. Disabilities, 4(2), 348–367. https://doi.org/10.3390/disabilities4020023
Crossref   Google Scholar

Forsterling, F. (2005). Atrybucje. Podstawowe teorie, badania i zastosowanie [Attributions: Basic theories, research, and applications]. Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.   Google Scholar

Griffith, G. M., Hutchinson, L., & Hastings, R. P. (2013). “I’m not a patient, I’m a person”: The experiences of individuals with intellectual disabilities and challenging behavior—A thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 20(4), 469–488. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/cpsp.12053
Crossref   Google Scholar

Hilton, D. J., & Slugoski, B. R. (1986). Knowledge-based causal attribution: The abnormal conditions focus model. Psychological Review, 93(1), 75–88. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.93.1.75
Crossref   Google Scholar

Isherwood, T., Burns, M., Naylor, M., & Read, S. (2007). ‘Getting into trouble’: A qualitative analysis of the onset of offending in the accounts of men with learning disabilities. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 18(2), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789940601111011
Crossref   Google Scholar

Jones, P., & Stenfert Kroese, B. (2007). Service users’ views of physical restraint procedures in secure settings for people with learning disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(1), 50–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.2006.00390.x
Crossref   Google Scholar

Kelley, H. H. (1973). The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28(2), 107–128. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0034225
Crossref   Google Scholar

Kurtek, P. (2020a). Causal attribution and coping with classmates' isolation and humiliation in young adults with mild intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, 11(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIDOB-10-2019-0019
Crossref   Google Scholar

Kurtek, P. (2020b). Causal attribution and coping with parental dominance and deprecation in youth with mild intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 33(3), 430–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12685
Crossref   Google Scholar

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. Springer Publishing Company.   Google Scholar

Leffert, J. S., Siperstein, G. N., & Widaman, K. F. (2010). Social perception in children with intellectual disabilities: the interpretation of benign and hostile intentions. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54(2), 168–180. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01240.x
Crossref   Google Scholar

Lewicka, M. (2005). Procesy atrybucji [Attribution processes]. In J. Strelau (Ed.), Psychologia: podręcznik akademicki. Jednostka w społeczeństwie i elementy psychologii stosowanej [Psychology: an academic textbook. The individual in society and elements of applied psychology] (Vol. 3), (pp. 45–77). Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.   Google Scholar

Matheson, C., Olsen, R. J., & Weisner, T. S. (2007). A good friend is hard to find: friendship among adolescents with disabilities. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 112(5), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2007)112[0319:AGFIHT]2.0.CO;2
Crossref   Google Scholar

Morrissey, C., Langdon, P. E., Geach, N., Chester, V., Ferriter, M., Lindsay, W. R., McCarthy, J., Devapriam, J., Walker, D.-M., Duggan, C., & Alexander, R. (2017). A systematic review and synthesis of outcome domains for use within forensic services for people with intellectual disabilities. BJPsych Open, 3(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjpo.bp.116.003616
Crossref   Google Scholar

Solish, A., Perry, A., & Minnes, P. (2010). Participation of children with and without disabilities in social, recreational and leisure activities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 23(3), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.2009.00525.x
Crossref   Google Scholar

Stevens, M. (2006). Moral positioning: Service user experiences of challenging behaviour in learning disability services. British Journal of Social Work, 36(6), 955–978. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch368
Crossref   Google Scholar

Tehrani-Doost, M., Shahrivar, Z., Pakbaz, B., Rezaie, A., & Ahmadi, F. (2011). Normative Data and Psychometric Properties of the Child Behavior Checklist and Teacher Rating Form in an Iranian Community Sample. Iranian Journal of Pediatrics, 21(3), 331–342. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23056810/   Google Scholar

Tipton, L. A., Christensen, L., & Blacher, J. (2013). Friendship Quality in Adolescents with and without an Intellectual Disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 26(6), 522–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12051
Crossref   Google Scholar

van Den Bogaard, K. J. H. M., Lugtenberg, M., Nijs, S., & Embregts, P. J. C. M. (2019). Attributions of People with Intellectual Disabilities of Their Own or Other Clients’ Challenging Behavior: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 12(3–4), 126–151. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/19315864.2019.1636911
Crossref   Google Scholar

van Den Bogaard, K. J. H. M., Nijman, H. L. I., & Embregts, P. J. C. M. (2020). Attributional styles of support staff working with people with intellectual disabilities exhibiting challenging behavior. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 33(3), 465–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12688
Crossref   Google Scholar

Webster, A. A., & Carter, M. (2012). A descriptive examination of the types of relationships formed between children with developmental disability and their closest peers in inclusive school settings. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 38(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2012.743650
Crossref   Google Scholar


Opublikowane
2024-12-20

Cited By /
Share

Kurtek, P. (2024). Determinants of Interpreting Difficult Classroom Situations by Young People with Mild Intellectual Disability – Case Study Analysis. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 67(3), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.31648/przegldpsychologiczny.11175

Paweł Kurtek 
Jan Kochanowski University, Department of Psychology
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2149-6175