Emotional Intelligence Versus Willingness to Engage in Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior (UPB). A Brief Research Report
Damian Grabowski
SWPS University, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology in Katowicehttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8589-4135
Rafał Kaznocha
SWPS University, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology in Katowicehttps://orcid.org/0009-0007-8943-9069
Patrycja Stawiarska
SWPS University, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology in Katowicehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9432-3913
Abstrakt
Aim: The purpose of this research was to determine the relationship between emotional intelligence (EI) considered as a trait and willingness to engage in unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB). This research was intended to fill the gap that exists in the field of research on the relationship between emotional intelligence and UPB.
Method: The study included 103 people working in companies across Poland. Emotional intelligence (EI) was examined using a questionnaire to diagnose the level of EI constructed by Borkowska and colleagues (2006). Readiness to undertake UPB was measured using the Polish version of the scale of unethical pro-organizational behavior (Grabowski et al., 2019).
Results: The study showed that there is a negative relationship between EI and UPB. Mood regulation, emotion perception and empathy, as well as knowledge and emotional insight are negatively related to willingness to undertake UPB. Mood regulation and emotion perception and empathy further appear as downward predictors of readiness to undertake UPB, explaining about 20% of UPB’ variance.
Conclusions: The study provided important insights into the relationship between EI and UPB in the group of Polish workers. It can be assumed that emotional intelligence (EI), especially mood regulation, and emotion perception and empathy are factors that reduce readiness to undertake UPB.
Słowa kluczowe:
emotional intelligence, emotional insight, mood regulation, unethical pro-organizational behaviorBibliografia
Bibi, Z., Karim, J., & ud Din, S. (2013). Workplace incivility and counterproductive work behavior: Moderating role of emotional intelligence. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 28(2), 317–334. Google Scholar
Borkowska, A., Gąsiorowska, A., & Nosal, C. S. (2006). Kwestionariusz do diagnozy poziomu inteligencji emocjonalnej [Questionnaire for diagnosing the level of emotional intelligence]. Przegląd Psychologiczny [The Review of Psychology], 49(1), 9‒20. Google Scholar
Duradoni, M., Gursesli, M. C., Martucci, A., Gonzalez Ayarza, I. Y., Colombini, G., & Guazzini, A. (2023). Dark Personality Traits and Counterproductive Work Behavior: A PRISMA Systematic Review. Psychological Reports, 332941231219921. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941231219921
Crossref
Google Scholar
Gorostiaga, A., Balluerka, N., Aritzeta, A., Haranburu, M., & Alonso-Arbiol, I. (2011). Measuring perceived emotional intelligence in adolescent population: Validation of the Short Trait Meta-Mood Scale (TMMS-23). International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 11(3), 523–537.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Grabowski, D., Chudzicka‐Czupała, A., Chrupała‐Pniak, M., Mello, A. L., & Paruzel‐Czachura, M. (2019). Work ethic and organizational commitment as conditions of unethical pro-organizational behavior: Do engaged workers break the ethical rules? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 27(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12241
Crossref
Google Scholar
Greenidge, D., & Coyne, I. (2014). Job stressors and voluntary work behaviours: Mediating effect of emotion and moderating roles of personality and emotional intelligence. Human Resource Management Journal, 24(4), 479–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12044
Crossref
Google Scholar
GUS (Główny Urząd Statystyczny). (2023). Pracujący w gospodarce narodowej w Polsce w lutym 2023 r. ‒ Tablice [Employed in the national economy in Poland in February 2023. – Tables]. https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/rynek-pracy/pracujacy-zatrudnieni-wynagrodzenia-koszty-pracy/pracujacy-w-gospodarce-narodowej-w-polsce-w-lutym-2023-r-tablice,28,2.html# Google Scholar
Jaworowska, A., & Matczak, A. (2008). Kwestionariusz Inteligencji Emocjonalnej INTE. Podręcznik [INTE Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire. Handbook]. Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP. Google Scholar
Luan, Y., Zhao, K., Wang, Z., & Hu, F. (2023). Exploring the antecedents of unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB): A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 187(1), 119‒136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05269-w
Crossref
Google Scholar
Miao, C., Humphrey, R. H., Qian, S., & Pollack, J. M. (2019). The relationship between emotional intelligence and the dark triad personality traits: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Research in Personality, 78, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.12.004
Crossref
Google Scholar
Salguero, J. M., Fernández-Berrocal, P., Balluerka, N., & Aritzeta, A. (2010). Measuring perceived emotional intelligence in adolescent population: Psychometric properties of the Trait Meta Mood Scale. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 38(9), 1197‒1210. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2010.38.9.1197
Crossref
Google Scholar
Salovey, P., Mayer, J. D., Goldman, S. L., Turvey, C., & Palfai, T. P. (1995). Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: Exploring emotional intelligence using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. In J. W. Pennebaker (Ed.), Emotion, disclosure, & health (pp. 125–154). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10182-006
Crossref
Google Scholar
Strelau, J. (2020). Różnice indywidualne. Historia – determinanty – zastosowania [Individual differences. History – determinants – applications]. Scholar. Google Scholar
Umphress, E. E., & Bingham, J. B. (2011). When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organization Science, 22(3), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0559
Crossref
Google Scholar
Umphress, E. E., Bingham, J. B., & Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 769–780. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019214
Crossref
Google Scholar
VandenBos, G. R. (Ed.). (2007). APA Dictionary of Psychology (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association. https://www.iccpp.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/APA-Dictionary-of-Psychology-by-American-Psychological-Association-z-lib.org_-2.pdf Google Scholar
Yu, M. C., Wang, G. G., Zheng, X.-T., & Shi, W.-J. (2020). Entrepreneur narcissism and unethical pro-organizational behaviour: an examination of mediated-moderation model. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33(1), 501–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1718525
Crossref
Google Scholar
SWPS University, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology in Katowice
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8589-4135
SWPS University, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology in Katowice
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8943-9069
SWPS University, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology in Katowice
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9432-3913
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
