Diagnostic tools for assessment of cognitive functioning in children and youth – the implementation project
Sylwia Bedyńska
SWPS Uniwersytet Humanistycznospołecznyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8255-1946
Dorota Campfield
Uniwersytet Warszawskihttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3555-3540
Radosław Kaczan
SWPS Uniwersytet Humanistycznospołecznyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2307-3216
Magdalena Kaczmarek
SWPS Uniwersytet Humanistycznospołecznyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1707-0403
Tomasz Knopik
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lubliniehttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5253-7545
Magdalena Kochańska
Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych w Warszawiehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8277-0409
Grażyna Krasowicz-Kupis
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lubliniehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5374-6872
Izabela Krejtz
SWPS Uniwersytet Humanistycznospołecznyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9827-8371
Anna Orylska
SWPS Uniwersytet Humanistycznospołecznyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3853-1806
Beata Papuda-Dolińska
Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych w Warszawiehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8872-0357
Piotr Rycielski
SWPS Uniwersytet Humanistycznospołecznyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6531-6119
Klara Rydzewska
SWPS Uniwersytet Humanistycznospołecznyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5683-6320
Grzegorz Sędek
SWPS Uniwersytet Humanistycznospołecznyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8932-0868
Magdalena Smoczyńska
Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych w Warszawiehttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2076-8933
Katarzyna Wiejak
Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych w Warszawiehttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1652-6106
Abstrakt
Purpose
The aim of this article is to present the application value of a diagnostic toolkit for assessment of cognitive functions based on a proprietary Multidimensional Model of Cognitive Functioning which combines executive functions with the field of perception, language, and communication.
Theses
The developed tools assess the level of executive functions (attention control, working memory, cognitive flexibility, and reasoning), the speed of perceptual processes, as well as linguistic functions in terms of speech- and writing-based communication.
Conclusions
All tasks have been prepared in a computer-based version. The innovativeness of the proposed battery of tests stems from the fact that the adopted model creates a coherent theoretical framework for the entire spectrum of functions describing the effectiveness
of cognitive processing in people of different ages and varying educational needs. In the context of the tools available in psychological and pedagogical counselling centres, this technically advanced tool will be the first test available on the Polish market covering
such a broad spectrum of cognitive functions. The tool has been designed to enable the diagnosis of diverse groups of people with special educational needs – from gifted children, through people with intellectual disabilities, visual and hearing impairments, neurodevelopmental disorders (e.g. autism), and language disorders and dyslexia, to migrant children. This broad scope of application was made possible by implementing the WCAG 2.1 and universal design principles.
Słowa kluczowe:
measurement tools, cognitive functions, children and youthBibliografia
Acrey, C., Johnstone, C., & Milligan, C. (2005). Using Universal Design to Unlock the Potential for Academic Achievement of At-Risk Learners. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(2), 22–31. Google Scholar
Allan, J. (2003). Editorial social inclusion. Policy Futures in Education, 1(4), 622–625. Google Scholar
Armitage, C. J. (2008). Cognitive and affective predictors of academic achievement in school children. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 57–74. Google Scholar
Bailey, C. E. (2007). Cognitive accuracy and intelligent executive function in the brain and in business. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,1118(1), 122–141. Google Scholar
Blair, C., & Razza, R. P. (2007). Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Development, 78, 647–663. Google Scholar
Borella, E., Caretti B., & Pelegrina, S. (2010). The specific role of inhibition in reading comprehension in good and poor comprehenders. Journal on Learning Disabilities, 43, 541–552. Google Scholar
Brown, T. E., & Landgraf, J. M. (2010). Improvements in executive function correlate with enhanced performance and functioning and health-related quality of life: evidence from 2 large, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials in ADHD. Postgraduate Google Scholar
Medicine, 122(5), 42–51. Google Scholar
Bull, R., & Scerif, G. (2001). Executive functioning as a predictor of children’s mathematics ability: Inhibition, swiching, and working memory. Developmental Neuropsychology, 19, 273–293. Google Scholar
Corno, L., & Anderman, E. M. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of educational psychology (3rd edition) New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. Google Scholar
Connell, B. R., Jones, M., Mace, R., Mueller, J., Mullick, A., Ostroff, E., Sanford, J., Steinfeld, E., Story, M., & Vanderheiden, G. (1997). The principles of universal design. Retrieved from http://design.ncsu.edu/cud/univ_design/principles/udprinciples.htm. Google Scholar
Cosden, M., Koegel, L. K., Koegel, R. L., Greenwell, A., & Klein E. (2006). Strength-based assessment for children with autism spectrum disorders. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31(2), 134–143. Google Scholar
Davis, J. C., Marra, C. A., Najafzadeh, M., & Liu-Ambrose, T. (2010). The independent contribution of executive functions to health related quality of life in older women. BMC Geriatrics, 10(1), 1–8. Google Scholar
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168. Google Scholar
Dolan, R. P., Hall, T. E., Banerjee, M., Chun, E., & Strangman, N. (2005). Applying principles of universal design to test delivery: The effect of computer-based read-aloud on test performance of high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(7), 4–32. Google Scholar
Domagała-Zyśk, E., Knopik, T., & Oszwa, U. (2017). Diagnoza funkcjonalna rozwoju społeczno-emocjonalnego uczniów w wieku 9–13 lat. Warszawa: Ośrodek Rozwoju Edukacji. Google Scholar
Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov P., Pagani, L., Feinstein, L., Engel, M., Brooks-Gunn, J., Sexton, H., Duckworth, K., Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446. Google Scholar
Elder, B. C., & Kuja, B. (2019). Going to school for the first time: inclusion committee members increasing the number of students with disabilities in primary schools in Kenya. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(3), 261- 279. Google Scholar
Elliott, J. G., & Grigorenko, E. L (2014). The dyslexia debate. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Engle, R. W., Sędek, G., von Hecker, U., & McIntosh, D. N. (Eds.). (2006). Ograniczenia poznawcze. Starzenie się i psychopatologia. Warszawa: Academica and PWN. Google Scholar
Fecenec, D., Jaworowska, A., Matczak, A., Grob A., Reiman G., Gut J., & Frischknecht M. C. (2015). Skale Inteligencji i Rozwoju dla dzieci w wieku 5–10 lat IDS. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP. Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. E., & Pickering, S. J. (2000). Assessment of Working Memory in Six- and Seven-Year Old Children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 377–390. Google Scholar
Gioia, G. A., Guy, S. C., Isquith, P. K., & Kenworthy, L. (1996). Behavior rating inventory of executive function. Psychological Assessment Resources. Google Scholar
Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., Kamps, D., & Arreaga-Mayer, C. (1990). Ecobehavioral analysis of classroom instruction. In S. Schroeder (Ed.), Ecobehavioral analysis and developmental disabilities: The twenty-first century (pp. 33–63). New York: Praeger. Google Scholar
Grob, A., Hagmann-von Arx, P., Jaworowska, A., Matczak, A., & Fecenec, D. (2018). IDS-2. Skale Inteligencji i Rozwoju dla Dzieci i Młodzieży. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP. Google Scholar
Grob, A., Reimann, G., Gut, J. Frichknecht, M. C., Fecenec, D., Jaworowska, A., & Matczak, A. (2015). IDS-P. Skale Inteligencji i Rozwoju dla Dzieci w Wieku Przedszkolnym. Podręcznik. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego. Google Scholar
Hall, T. E., Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (2012). Universal design for learning in the classroom: practical applications. New York: Guilford Press. Google Scholar
Hornowska, E. (2014). Testy psychologiczne. Teoria i praktyka. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar. Google Scholar
Jaworowska, A., Matczak, A., & Fecenec, D. (2012). IDS. Skale Inteligencji i Rozwoju dla dzieci w wieku 5–10 lat IDS. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP. Google Scholar
Kelly, B., & Perkins, D. F. (2012). Handbook of Implementation Science for Psychology in Education. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Ketterlin-Geller, L. R. (2005). Knowing What All Students Know: Procedures for Developing Universal Design for Assessment. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 4(2), 1–22. Google Scholar
Knopik, T. (2018). Diagnoza funkcjonalna. Planowanie pomocy psychologiczno-pedagogicznej. Działania postdiagnostyczne. Warszawa: Ośrodek Rozwoju Edukacji. Google Scholar
Krasowicz-Kupis, G., Wiejak, K., & Bogdanowicz, K. M. (2015). Bateria Testów Fonologicznych BTF IBE. Podręcznik. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych. Google Scholar
Kurcz, I. (2000). Psychologia języka i komunikacji. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar. Google Scholar
Mace, R. (1985). Universal design: Barrier free environments for everyone. Designers West, 33(1), 147–152. Google Scholar
Magyar-Moe, J. L., Owens, R. L., & Conoley, C. W. (2015). Positive psychological interventions in counseling: What every counseling psychologist should know. The Counseling Psychologist, 43(4), 508–557. Google Scholar
McCloskey, G., & Perkins, L. A. (2013). Essentials of Executive Functions Assessment. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
Milewski, T. (1965). Językoznawstwo. Warszawa: PWN. Google Scholar
Morrison, F. J., Ponitz, C. C., & McClelland, M. M. (2010). Self-regulation and academic achievement in the transition to school. In S. D. Calkins & M. Bell (Eds.), Child development at the intersection of emotion and cognition (pp. 203–224). Washington, Google Scholar
DC: American Psychological Association. Google Scholar
Peterson R. L., & Pennington B. F. (2012). Developmental dyslexia. The Lancet, 379(9830), 1997–2007. Google Scholar
Rivera, C., & Stansfield, C. (2001). The Effects of Linguistic Simplification of Science Test Items on Performance of Limited English Proficient and Monolingual English-Speaking Students. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Google Scholar
Seattle, WA. Google Scholar
Rose, D. H., Meyer, A., & Hitchcock, C. (2005). The universally designed classroom: Accessible curriculum and digital technologies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press. Google Scholar
Sędek, G., Krejtz, I., Rydzewska, K., Kaczan, R., & Rycielski, P. (2016). Three functional aspects of working memory as strong predictors of early school achievements: The review and illustrative evidence. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 47(1), 103–111. Google Scholar
Spencer, S. A. (2011). Universal design for learning: Assistance for teachers in today’s inclusive classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 10–22. Google Scholar
Stuss, D. T., & Alexander, M. P. (2000). Executive functions and the frontal lobes: a conceptual view. Psychological Research, 63(3), 289–298. Google Scholar
Thompson, S., Johnstone, C. J., & Thurlow, M. L. (2002). Universal design applied to large scale assessments (SynthesisReport4). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Google Scholar
Weishaar, P. M. (2010). Twelve ways to incorporate strengths-based planning into the IEP process. Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(6), 207–210. Google Scholar
Welsh, M. C., & Pennington, B. F. (1988). Assessing frontal lobe functioning in children: Views from developmental psychology. Developmental Neuropsychology, 4(3), 199–230. Google Scholar
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5374-6872
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
