COVID-19 pandemic and pollution of the environment – threat perception, willingness to incur economic costs, psychological resources, and behaviors
Grażyna Wąsowicz
Kozminski University, Department of Economic Psychologyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4769-8963
Abstrakt
Objectives: 1. Comparison of COVID-19 and environmental pollution threats perception, willingness to incur costs to protect against these threats, and perceptions of competence to counteract these threats. 2. Comparison of the pattern of relationships in the context of each of the threats between (a) threat perception and willingness to incur economic costs versus protective/preventive behaviors against the threat; (b) threat perception and willingness to incur costs versus protective/preventive behaviors; (c) psychological resources (life aspirations, perceived competence, and stress coping strategies) versus the willingness to incur costs and adopt protective/preventive behaviors.
Method: Three hundred people, 50% women and 50% men aged from 19 to 59 years (M = 39,79, SD = 11) participated in the online study. The following scales were used: COVID-19 threat perception (Cypryańska & Nezlek, 2020) and willingness to incur costs of acting against COVID-19 (Cypryańska & Nezlek, 2020), both applied also in the context of environmental pollution threat; Coping strategies inventory (Addison et al., 2007); Life aspirations index-23 (Grouzet et al., 2005), and scales of perceived competence of protection against COVID-19 and changing consumption behavior (inspired by Williams et al., 1998). The predicted variables were protective behaviors against COVID-19 and preventive behaviors that reduce environmental pollution.
Results: The perceived threat of environmental pollution, willingness to incur economic costs, and competence were all rated higher than the COVID-19 threat. The relationship patterns in models of threats showed similarities as well as differences. The perception of threats to the individual and the world, community contributions as a life goal, perceived competence, and stress-coping strategies were associated with behavior change.
Conclusion: Each threat has its specificity that should be considered when searching for predictors of various aspects of individuals' functioning and developing communication strategies to change behaviors.
Słowa kluczowe:
COVID-19, economic costs, environmental pollution, psychological resources, stress, threatBibliografia
Addison, C. C., Campbell-Jenkins, B. W., Sarpong, D. F., Kibler, J., Singh, M., Dubbert, P., Wilson, G., Payne, T., & Taylor, H. (2007). Psychometric evaluation of a Coping Strategies Inventory Short-Form (CSI-SF) in the Jackson Heart Study cohort. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 4(4), 289–295. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph200704040004
Crossref
Google Scholar
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Crossref
Google Scholar
Aldwin, C. A. (2000). Stress, coping and development: An integrative perspective. Guildford Press. Google Scholar
APS (Australian Psychological Society). (n.d.). Coping and adapting to climate change. Retrieved August 10, 2023, from: https://psychology.org.au/community/advocacy-social-issues/environment-climate-change-psychology/resources-for-psychologists-and-others-advocating/coping-and-adapting-to-climate-change Google Scholar
Bish, A., & Michie, S. (2010). Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: A review. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 797–824. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910710X485826
Crossref
Google Scholar
Bonneville-Roussy, A., Evans, P., Verner-Filion, J., Vallerand, R. J., & Bouffard, T. (2017). Motivation and coping with the stress of assessment: Gender differences in outcomes for university students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 48, 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.08.003
Crossref
Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267
Crossref
Google Scholar
Cheng, C., Ying, W., Ebrahimi, O. V., & Wong, K. F. E. (2023). Coping style and mental health amid the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: A culture-moderated meta-analysis of 44 nations. Health Psychology Review, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2023.2175015
Crossref
Google Scholar
Cypryańska, M., & Nezlek, J. B. (2020). Anxiety as a mediator of relationships between perceptions of the threat of COVID-19 and coping behaviors during the onset of the pandemic in Poland. PLOS ONE, 15(10), Article e0241464. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241464
Crossref
Google Scholar
Cypryańska, M., & Wójcik, A. (2022, April 11). Pandemia COVID-19 – szanse i wyzwania dla przemian społecznych w stronę zielonej transformacji [COVID-19 pandemic – opportunities and challenges for social changes towards green transformation] [lecture]. Zagrożenie COVID-19 oraz zagrożenie zmianą klimatu w świetle wyników badań psychologicznych, Warszawa, Polska [The threat of COVID-19 and the threat of climate change in the light of the results of psychological research, Warsaw, Poland]. Google Scholar
Darlington, R., & Hayes, A. F. (2017). Regression analysis and linear models: concepts, application, and implementation. Guilford Press. Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Crossref
Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2004). Self-determination theory and basic need satisfaction: Understanding human development in positive psychology. Ricerche di Psicologia, 27(1), 23–40. Google Scholar
Dragioti, E., Li, H., Tsitsas, G., Lee, K. H., Choi, J., Kim, J., Choi, Y. J., Tsamakis, K., Estradé, A., Agorastos, A., Vancampfort, D., Tsiptsios, D., Thompson, T., Mosina, A., Vakadaris, G., Fusar-Poli, P., Carvalho, A. F., Correll, C. U., Han, Y. J., Park, S., Il Shin, J., & Solmi, M. (2022). A large-scale meta-analytic atlas of mental health problems prevalence during the COVID-19 early pandemic. Journal of Medical Virology, 94(5), 1935–1949. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27549
Crossref
Google Scholar
Grouzet, F. M., Kasser, T., Ahuvia, A., Dols, J. M., Kim, Y., Lau, S., Ryan, R. M., Saunders, S., Schmuck, P., & Sheldon, K. M. (2005). The structure of goal contents across 15 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(5), 800–816. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.800
Crossref
Google Scholar
Grunert, K. G., Janssen, M., Christensen, R. N., Teunissen, L., Cuykx, I., Decorte, P., & Reisch, L. A. (2022). “Corona cooking:” The interrelation between emotional response to the first lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic and cooking attitudes and behaviour in Denmark. Food Quality and Preference, 96, Article 104425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104425
Crossref
Google Scholar
Hayes, A. F. (2012). Process: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modelling (White paper). Retrieved June 20, 2023, from: http://www.afhayes.com/public/process.pdf. https://www.processmacro. org/index.html Google Scholar
Hepburn, C., O’Callaghan, B., Stern, N., Stiglitz, J., & Zenghelis, D. (2020). Will COVID-19 fiscal recovery packages accelerate or retard progress on climate change? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36, Issue Supplement_1, 359–381. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/graa015
Crossref
Google Scholar
Johnston, M., & Johnston, D. (1998). Assessment and measurement issues. In A. S. Bellack & M. Hersen (Eds.), Comprehensive Clinical Psychology, Vol. 8 (pp. 113–135). Pergamon.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 280–287.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Be careful what you wish for: Optimal functioning and the relative attainment of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. In P. Schmuck & K. M. Sheldon (Eds.), Life goals and well-being: Towards a positive psychology of human striving (pp. 116–131). Hogrefe & Huber Publishers. Google Scholar
Latkin, C., Dayton, L., Scherkoske, M., Countess, K., & Thrul, J. (2022). What predicts climate change activism? An examination of how depressive symptoms, climate change distress, and social norms are associated with climate change activism. The Journal of Climate Change and Health, 8, Article 100146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joclim.2022.100146
Crossref
Google Scholar
Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer. Google Scholar
Rosenthal, J. A. (1996). Qualitative descriptors of strength of association and effect size. Journal of Social Service Research, 21(4), 37–59.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Ntoumanis, N., Edmunds, J., & Duda, J. L. (2009). Understanding the coping process from a self-determination theory perspective. British Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910708X349352
Crossref
Google Scholar
Rubin, G. J., Amlôt, R., Page, L., & Wessely, S. (2009). Public perceptions, anxiety, and behaviour change in relation to the swine flu outbreak: Cross sectional telephone survey. BMJ, 339, Article b2651. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2651
Crossref
Google Scholar
Searle, K., & Gow, K. (2010). Do concerns about climate change lead to distress? International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 2(4), 362–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/17568691011089891
Crossref
Google Scholar
Stach, R. (2006). Optymizm. Badania nad optymizmem jako mechanizmem adaptacyjnym [Optimism. Research on optimism as an adaptation mechanism]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Google Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1130.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Wąsowicz, G. (2022, April 11). Pandemia COVID-19 i zanieczyszczenie środowiska. Percepcja zagrożeń, gotowość ponoszenia kosztów ekonomicznych w walce z nimi, zachowania i potrzebne zasoby psychologiczne [lecture]. Zagrożenie COVID-19 oraz zagrożenie zmianą klimatu w świetle wyników badań psychologicznych, Warszawa, Polska [The threat of COVID-19 and the threat of climate change in the light of the results of psychological research, Warsaw, Poland].
Crossref
Google Scholar
Wąsowicz, G., & Poleszczuk, J. (2021). Sociological and psychological view on selected determinants of behaviour change and non-change in Covid Times. In International Panel on Behavior Change. COVID-19: Introduction to IPBC Issues, online (pp. 53–63). https://www.ipbc.science/about-us/reports/thematic-report-1-covid/ Google Scholar
WHO. (2022). https://www.who.int/news/item/03-06-2022-why-mental-health-is-a-priority-for-action-on-climate-change Google Scholar
Williams, G. C., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 767–779. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.70.4.767
Crossref
Google Scholar
Williams, G. C., Freedman, Z.R., & Deci, E. L. (1998). Supporting autonomy to motivate glucose control in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care, 21, 1644–1651.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Zawadzka, A. M., Duda, J., Rymkiewicz, R., & Kondratowicz, B. (2015). Siedmiowymiarowy model aspiracji życiowych Kassera i Ryana. Analiza trafności i rzetelności narzędzia [Seven-dimensional model of life aspirations by Kasser and Ryan: analysis of validity and reliability of the instrument]. Psychologia Społeczna [Social Psychological Bulletin], 10(1), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.7366/1896180020153207 Google Scholar
Życińska, J., & Heszen, I. (2009). Resources, coping with stress, positive emotions, and health. Introduction. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 40(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.2478/s10059-009-0001-7
Crossref
Google Scholar
Kozminski University, Department of Economic Psychology
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4769-8963
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
