Decisions by Judges, Other Court Professionals, and Laypeople That Intervene in the Functioning of Families Facing Parenting Challenges With Adolescents

Aleksandra Sobotka

SWPS University in Warsaw, Institute of Psychology
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7443-9239


Abstrakt

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to compare the decisions made by court-related professionals and laypeople regarding the degree of interference of courts and subordinate institutions in the functioning of families with upbringing problems, as well as to confront the decision-making mechanisms that guide them. The research questions concerned the extent to which the possible decisions of professionals align with the beliefs of citizens who may be affected by such decisions. The results of surveys conducted among judges (n = 44), other judicial professionals (n = 51) and laypeople (n = 55) are presented.

Method: The survey was carried out using a proprietary tool developed on the basis of juvenile procedure regulations and case describing young people with upbringing problems. Participants also completed Schwartz’s Portrait Values Questionnaire (PVQ). Factor analysis identified two dimensions of interaction: judicial intervention and supportive measures.

Results: The results showed that all the groups studied, judges, court professionals and laypeople, preferred supportive actions. As the severity of the child’s problems increased, the frequency with which the respondents proposed intervention activities increased as well. In addition, laypeople took a more punitive stance than experts, proposing intervention measures more often. In contrast, specialists diagnosing the family indicated the most supportive actions.

Conclusion: The values included in Schwartz’s circular structure were considered constructs that explain the decisions of teenagers with behavioral problems. It turned out that in the general population, values related to the self increase the propensity to intervene; this issue is different in groups representing judicial professions, among whom this tendency was not observed. The higher the pro-social values (kindness, universalism) were declared, the lower the acceptance of interventionism and the higher the acceptance of supportive measures.


Słowa kluczowe:

family, behavioral problems, judges, laypeople, values


Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(10), 1207–1220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203254602
Crossref   Google Scholar

Bartkowicz, Z. (2013). Agresywność, kompetencje społeczne i samoocena resocjalizowanych nieletnich a ich przestępczość w okresie dorosłości [Aggressiveness, social competence, and self-esteem of resocialized juveniles and their criminality in adulthood]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej.   Google Scholar

Bornstein, B. H., & Miller, M. K. (2009). Does a judge’s religion influence decision making? Court Review, 45(3), 112–115.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Boski, P. (2022). Kulturowe ramy zachowań społecznych [Cultural frameworks of social behawior] (2nd ed.). Wydawnictwo PWN.   Google Scholar

Brooks, E. M., & Thomas, S. (1997). The perception and judgment of senior baccalaureate student nurses in clinical decision making. Advances in Nursing Science, 19(3), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-199703000-00006
Crossref   Google Scholar

Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej. (2023). Przemoc wobec dzieci – opinie, doświadczenia, reagowanie [Violence against children – opinions, experiences, and responses] (Research report, No. 110/2023). https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2023/K_110_23.PDF   Google Scholar

Conroy, M., Hess, R. D., Azuma, H., & Kashiwagi, K. (1980). Maternal strategies for regulating children’s behavior: Japanese and American families. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 11(2), 153–172.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Czarnecka-Dzialuk, B., & Wójcik, D. (2011). Stosowanie sądowych środków oddziaływania wobec nieletnich w świetle koncepcji teoretycznych, statystyk oraz opinii sędziów i kuratorów rodzinnych [The application of judicial measures towards juveniles in the light of theoretical concepts, statistics, and the opinions of family court judges and probation officers]. https://iws.gov.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/AR_Wójcik.-Czarnecka-DzialukStos.sÄ…dowych-Å%E2%80%BAr.-oddz.-wobec-niel.pdf   Google Scholar

Drapała, K., & Kulma, R. (2014). Powrotność do przestępstwa nieletnich opuszczających zakłady poprawcze [Recidivism of juveniles leaving correctional institutions [research report]. Prawo w działaniu, 19, 204–246.   Google Scholar

Eisenberg, T., Hannaford‐Agor, P. L., Hans, V. P., Waters, N. L., Munsterman, G. T., Schwab, S. J., & Wells, M. T. (2005). Judge‐Jury agreement in criminal cases: A partial replication of Kalven and Zeisel’s The American Jury. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2(1), 171–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2005.00035.x
Crossref   Google Scholar

Englich, B., Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2006). Playing dice with criminal sentences: The influence of irrelevant anchors on experts’ judicial decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(2), 188‒200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205282152
Crossref   Google Scholar

Feather, N. T. (1985). Attitudes, values, and attributions: Explanations of unemployment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 876–889. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.876
Crossref   Google Scholar

Feather, N. T. (1988). Values, valences, and course enrollment: Testing the role of personal values within an expectancy-valence framework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.381
Crossref   Google Scholar

Feather, N. T. (1994). Human values and their relation to justice. Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01201.x
Crossref   Google Scholar

Feather, N. T. (1995). Values, valences, and choice: The influences of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(6), 1135–1151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1135
Crossref   Google Scholar

Feather, N. T., & Newton, J. W. (1982). Values, expectations, and the prediction of social action: An expectancy-valence analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 6, 217–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992246
Crossref   Google Scholar

Feather, N. T., & O’Brien, G. E. (1987). Looking for employment: An expectancy–valence analysis of job‐seeking behaviour among young people. British Journal of Psychology, 78(2), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1987.tb02244.x
Crossref   Google Scholar

Flannery, D. J., Hussey, D., & Jefferis, E. (2005). Adolescent delinquency and violent behavior. In T. P. Gullotta, G. R. Adams (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent behavioral problems: Evidence-based approaches to prevention and treatment (pp. 415–438). Springer.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Givelber, D., & Farrell, A. (2008). Judges and juries: The defense case and differences in acquittal rates. Law & Social Inquiry, 33(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2008.00093.x
Crossref   Google Scholar

Grusec, J. E., Goodnow, J. J., & Kuczynski, L. (2000). New directions in analyses of parenting contributions to children’s acquisition of values. Child Development, 71(1), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00135
Crossref   Google Scholar

Guthrie, C., Rachlinski, J. J., & Wistrich, A. J. (2002). Judging by heuristic: Cognitive illusions in judicial decision making. Cornell Law Faculty Publications, 862, 44–50. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1733&context=facpub   Google Scholar

Harkness, S., & Super, C. (1995). Culture and parenting. In M. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (Vol. 2), Biology, and ecology of parenting (pp. 211–233). Erlbaum.   Google Scholar

House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations. The Globe study of 62 societies. Sage Publications.   Google Scholar

Idleman, S. C. (2005). The concealment of religious values in judicial decision making. Virginia Law Review, 91(2), 515–534.   Google Scholar

Kagitcibasi, C. (2002). A model of family change in cultural context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1059.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Kagitcibasi, C. (2007). Family, self, and human development across cultures: Theories and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Kalven, H., & Zeisel, H. (1966). The American Jury. Little, Brown and Company.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Kelly, J. L., & Tseng, H.-M. (1992). Cultural differences in child rearing: A comparison of immigrant Chinese and Caucasian American mothers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 23(4), 444–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022192234002
Crossref   Google Scholar

Kerig, P. K., & Becker, S. P. (2015). Early abuse and neglect as risk factors for the development of criminal and antisocial behavior. In J. Morizot, L. Kazemian (Eds.), The development of criminal and antisocial behavior (pp. 181–199). Springer.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Klein, M. (1987). Selected Melanie Klein (J. Mitchell, Ed.). Simon and Schuster.   Google Scholar

Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 2 kwietnia 1997 r. Dz.U. 1997 nr 78, poz. 483 (1997) (Polska). Sejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. https://www.sejm.gov.pl/prawo/konst/polski/kon1.htm.   Google Scholar

Konwencja o prawach dziecka z dnia 20 listopada 1989 r. (tj. Dz.U. z 2021 r., poz. 2117). https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU19911200526   Google Scholar

Leśniak, B., & Leśniak, M. (2016). Z badań nad czynnikami wpływającymi na podejmowanie decyzji o wymiarze kary [From research on factors influencing sentencing decisions]. Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie/Politechnika Śląska, 95, 261–273.   Google Scholar

Mullen, E., & Skitka, L. J. (2006). Exploring the psychological underpinnings of the moral mandate effect: Motivated reasoning, group differentiation, or anger? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 629–643. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.629
Crossref   Google Scholar

Ostrowska, K., & Tatarowicz, J. (Eds.). (1998). Agresja i przemoc w szkołach polskich i niemieckich: materiały z polsko-niemieckiej konferencji naukowej [Aggression and violence in Polish and German schools: Proceedings from the Polish-German scientific conference]. Centrum Metodyczne Pomocy Psychologiczno-Pedagogicznej Ministerstwa Edukacji Narodowej.   Google Scholar

Partyk, A. (2023). Czy sędziowie mają intuicję?: przyczynek do rozważań o sędziowskich mechanizmach decyzyjnych [Do judges have intuition? A contribution to considerations on judicial decision-making mechanisms]. Oficyna Wydawnicza Humanitas.   Google Scholar

Plopa, M. (2007). Psychologia rodziny: teoria i badania [Family psychology: Theory and research]. Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.   Google Scholar

Rachlinski, J. J., Guthrie, C., & Wistrich, A. J. (2007). Heuristics and biases in bankruptcy judges. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 163(1), 167–186.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Rode, D. (2010). Psychologiczne uwarunkowania przemocy w rodzinie: charakterystyka sprawców [Psychological determinants of domestic violence: Characteristics of perpetrators]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.   Google Scholar

Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (1995). Value priorities and readiness for out-group social contact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(3), 437–448. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.437
Crossref   Google Scholar

Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2004). Values, intelligence and client behavior in career counseling: A field study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(3), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173222
Crossref   Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universal in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
Crossref   Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. In R. Jowell, C. Roberts, R. Fitzgerald, G. Eva (Eds.), Measuring attitudes cross-nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey (pp. 169–203). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209458.n9
Crossref   Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H., & Barnea, M. (1995). Los valores en orientaciones politicas: Aplicaciones en Espana [The values in political orientations: Applications in Spain], Venezuela y Mejico. Psychologia Politica, 11, 15–40.   Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., Ramos, A., Verkasalo, M., Lönnqvist, J.-E., Demirutku, K., Dirilen-Gumus, O., & Konty, M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029393
Crossref   Google Scholar

Simon, H., & Chase, W. (1988). Skill in chess. In D. Levy (Ed.), Computer chess compendium (pp. 175–188). Springer New York.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Skitka, L. J. (2006). Legislating morality: How deep is the U.S. Supreme Court’s reservoir of good will? [conference paper]. International Society for Justice Research, Berlin, Germany.   Google Scholar

Songer, D. R., & Tabrizi, S. J. (1999). The religious right in court: The decision making of Christian evangelicals in state supreme courts. The Journal of Politics, 61(2), 507–526.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Stanik, J. M. (2005). Warunki opiekuńczo-wychowawcze w rodzinie, radzenie sobie z wymaganiami szkolnymi a stopień ryzyka przestępczości nieletnich [Care and upbringing conditions in the family, coping with school demands, and the degree of juvenile delinquency risk]. In J. M. Stanik, L. Woszczek (Eds.), Przestępczość nieletnich. Aspekty psychospołeczne i prawne (pp. 87–104). Wydawnictwo UŚ.   Google Scholar

Super, C. M, & Harkness, S. (1997). The cultural structuring of child development. In J. W. Berry, P. R. Dasen, T. S. Saraswathi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. Vol 2: Basic processes and human development (pp. 1–39). Allyn and Bacon.   Google Scholar

Super, C. M., Harkness, S., van Tijen, N., van der Vlugt, J., Dijkstra, J., & Fintelman, M. (1996). The three R’s of Dutch childrearing and the socialization of infant arousal. In S. Harkness, C. M. Super (Eds.), Parents’ cultural belief systems: Their origins, expression, and consequences (pp. 447–466). Guilford Press.   Google Scholar

Szecówka, A. (2013). Powrotność na drogę przestępczą nieletnich zwolnionych z różnych typów zakładów poprawczych [Recidivism among juveniles released from different types of correctional facilities]. In B. Jezierska, A. Rejzner, P. Szczepaniak, A. Szecówka (Eds.), Profilaktyka i resocjalizacja w nurtach inkluzji. Doświadczenia, problemy, perspektywy międzynarodowe (pp. 339–361). Wydawnictwo UW.   Google Scholar

Szymanowska, A. (2004). Więźniowie młodociani poddani systemowi programowego oddziaływania na podstawie badań psychologiczno-kryminologicznych [Juvenile inmates subjected to programmatic interventions based on psychologo-criminological research]. Archiwum Kryminologii, 26, 53–100.   Google Scholar

Szymański, A. (2010). Niedostosowanie społeczne dzieci i młodzieży: wybrane problemy [Social maladjustment of children and adolescents: Selected issues]. Wydawnictwo WSP TWP.   Google Scholar

Ustawa z dnia 9 czerwca 2022 r. o wspieraniu i resocjalizacji nieletnich Dz.U. 2022 poz. 1700 (2022) (Polska). https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20220001700/T/D20221700L.pdf   Google Scholar

Włodarczyk-Madejska, J. (2020). Efektywność środków izolacyjnych orzekanych wobec nieletnich [Effectiveness of isolation measures imposed on juveniles]. Prawo w Działaniu, 43, 172–210. https://doi.org/10.32041/pwd.4310
Crossref   Google Scholar

Zolkoski, S. M., & Bullock, L. M. (2012). Resilience in children and youth: A review. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(12), 2295–2303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.08.009
Crossref   Google Scholar


Opublikowane
2025-09-28

Cited By /
Share

Sobotka, A. (2025). Decisions by Judges, Other Court Professionals, and Laypeople That Intervene in the Functioning of Families Facing Parenting Challenges With Adolescents. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 68(2), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.31648/przegldpsychologiczny.12041

Aleksandra Sobotka 
SWPS University in Warsaw, Institute of Psychology
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7443-9239