Cultural Conservatism and Perceptions of Women and Men Returning to Work After Parental Leave
Krzysztof Kruszewski
SWPS Universityhttps://orcid.org/0009-0008-4971-5505
Magdalena Gąsiorowska
SWPS Universityhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3798-9265
Zuzanna Mikosza
SWPS Universityhttps://orcid.org/0009-0007-4333-4165
Abstract
Objective: The study aimed to determine how the decision to take or forgo parental leave affects social perceptions of women and men returning to work after the birth of a child, and whether these evaluations vary with participants’ level of cultural conservatism. Drawing on social role theory and role congruity theory, we examined differences in perceived selfishness, antisociality, and agency.
Method: The study involved 138 participants randomly assigned to one of four groups that differed in the gender of the person described and that person’s decision regarding parental leave. Participants evaluated the individuals presented using adjective rating scales and completed a measure of cultural conservatism.
Results: Women who forwent parental leave were rated as more selfish and antisocial than women who took leave. Higher cultural conservatism among participants was associated with higher perceived antisociality of women who forwent leave, while a nonsignificant trend in the same direction was observed for selfishness. Fathers who forwent leave were evaluated less favorably than fathers who took it. For perceived selfishness, a nonsignificant trend indicated an association between lower cultural conservatism among participants and harsher evaluations of fathers who forwent leave. In addition, women who forwent leave were perceived as more agentic than men who made the same decision.
Conclusion: The findings highlight the importance of gender roles and ideological orientations in shaping social evaluations of parenting decisions. They may provide an important reference point for organizational policies and measures that promote an equal division of caregiving responsibilities in the workplace.
Keywords:
gender roles, conservatism, parental leave, social role theory, role congruity theoryReferences
Avendano, M., Berkman, L. F., Brugiavini, A., & Pasini, G. (2015). The long-run effect of maternity leave benefits on mental health: Evidence from European countries. Social Science & Medicine, 132, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.02.037 Google Scholar
Brescoll, V. L., & Uhlmann, E. L. (2005). Attitudes toward traditional and nontraditional parents. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(4), 436–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00244.x Google Scholar
Cardenas, S. I., Corbisiero, M. F., Morris, A. R., & Saxbe, D. E. (2021). Associations between paid paternity leave and parental mental health across the transition to parenthood: Evidence from a repeated-measure study of first-time parents in California. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 30(12), 3080–3094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-021-02139-3 Google Scholar
Czarnek, G., Dragon, P., Szwed, P., & Wojciszke, B. (2017). Kwestionariusz przekonań politycznych: własności psychometryczne [Political Beliefs Questionnaire: Psychometric properties]. Psychologia Społeczna, 12(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.7366/1896180020174108 Google Scholar
Diekman, A. B., & Goodfriend, W. (2006). Rolling with the changes: A role congruity perspective on gender norms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(4), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00312.x Google Scholar
Duvander, A. Z., & Jans, A. C. (2009). Consequences of father’s parental leave use: Evidence from Sweden. Finnish Yearbook of Population Research, 44, 49–62. https://doi.org/10.23979/fypr.45044 Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2012). Social role theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 458–476). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n49 Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2016). Social role theory of sex differences. In N. A. Naples, R. C. Hoogland, M. Wickramasinghe, & W. C. A. Wong (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of gender and sexuality studies (pp. 1–3). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss183 Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2012). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Psychology Press. Google Scholar
Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2008). Motherhood: A potential source of bias in employment decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.189 Google Scholar
Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 416–427. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416 Google Scholar
Huerta, M. C., Adema, W., Baxter, J., Han, W.-J., Lausten, M., Lee, R., & Waldfogel, J. (2014). Fathers’ leave and fathers’ involvement: Evidence from four OECD countries. European Journal of Social Security, 16(4), 308–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/138826271401600403 Google Scholar
International Labour Organization. (2024). The impact of care responsibilities on women’s labour force participation. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/2024-10/GEDI-STAT%20brief_formatted_28.10.24_final.pdf Google Scholar
Janoff-Bulman, R. (2009). To provide or protect: Motivational bases of political liberalism and conservatism. Psychological Inquiry, 20(2–3), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028581 Google Scholar
Lalive, R., Schlosser, A., Steinhauer, A., & Zweimüller, J. (2014). Parental leave and mothers’ careers: The relative importance of job protection and cash benefits. Review of Economic Studies, 81(1), 219–265. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdt028 Google Scholar
Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Policy. (2018). Urlopy dla rodziców [Leave for parents]. https://www.gov.pl/web/rodzina/urlopy-dla-rodzicow Google Scholar
Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Policy. (2023a). Urlop macierzyński [Maternity leave]. https://www.gov.pl/web/rodzina/urlop-macierzynski Google Scholar
Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Policy. (2023b). Urlop rodzicielski [Parental leave]. https://www.gov.pl/web/rodzina/urlop-rodzicielski Google Scholar
Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Policy. (2024). Urlop ojcowski [Paternity leave]. https://www.gov.pl/web/rodzina/urlop-ojcowski Google Scholar
OECD. (2023). SIGI 2023 global report: Gender equality in times of crisis. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/4607b7c7-en Google Scholar
OECD. (2025). Gender equality in a changing world. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e808086f-en Google Scholar
O’Hara, M. W., & Swain, A. M. (1996). Rates and risk of postpartum depression—A meta-analysis. International Review of Psychiatry, 8(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.3109/09540269609037816 Google Scholar
Pracuj.pl. (2018). Rodzice w pracy. Życie na pełen etat [Parents at work. A full-time life]. https://odpowiedzialnybiznes.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Rodzice_w_pracy_%C5%BBycie_na_pe%C5%82ny_etat_-_Raport_Pracuj_pl.pdf Google Scholar
Sokol, B. W., Hammond, S. I., Kuebli, J., & Sweetman, L. (2015). The development of agency. In W. F. Overton, P. C. M. Molenaar, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Theory and method (7th ed., pp. 284–322). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy108 Google Scholar
Solomon, C. R. (2014). “I feel like a rock star”: Fatherhood for stay-at-home fathers. Fathering, 12(1), 52–70. https://doi.org/10.3149/fth.1201.52. Google Scholar
Staehelin, K., Bertea, P. C., & Stutz, E. Z. (2007). Length of maternity leave and health of mother and child – A review. International Journal of Public Health, 52(4), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-007-5122-1 Google Scholar
Statistics Poland. (2024, August 26). Pracujący, bezrobotni i bierni zawodowo (wyniki wstępne BAEL) – 2 kwartał 2024 roku [Employed, unemployed and economically inactive persons (preliminary Labour Force Survey results) – Second quarter of 2024]. https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/rynek-pracy/pracujacy-bezrobotni-bierni-zawodowo-wg-bael/pracujacy-bezrobotni-i-bierni-zawodowo-wyniki-wstepne-bael-2-kwartal-2024-roku%2C12%2C61.html Google Scholar
Tanaka, S. (2005). Parental leave and child health across OECD countries. The Economic Journal, 115(501), F7–F28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-0133.2005.00970.x Google Scholar
Van Hiel, A., & Mervielde, I. (2004). Openness to experience and boundaries in the mind: Relationships with cultural and economic conservative beliefs. Journal of Personality, 72(4), 659–686. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00276.x Google Scholar
Virenque, L., & Mossio, M. (2024). What is agency? A view from autonomy theory. Biological Theory, 19(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-023-00441-5 Google Scholar
Włodarczyk, J. (2014). Być tatą. Wyniki badania polskich ojców [Being a dad. Findings from a study of Polish fathers]. Dziecko krzywdzone. Teoria, badania, praktyka, 13(3), 94–138. Google Scholar
Wojciszke, B. (2012). Psychologia społeczna [Social psychology]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar. Google Scholar
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
