The Test2Drive system in driver assessments: relationships between theory, law and practice
Abstract
abst
Keywords:
Driver tests, psychomotor fitness, personality, databases, apparatus tests, psychological dysfunctionsReferences
Bonnet, G., Debanne, T., & Laffaye, G. (2020). Toward a better theoretical and practical understanding of field players’ decision-making in handball: A systematic review. Movement Sport Sciences, 4, 1–19. DOI: 10.1051/sm/2020008.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Broadbent, D.E, Cooper P.F, FitzGerald P., & Parkes K.R. (1982). The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21, 1–16. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1982.tb01421.x.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Cheng, A. S., Ng, T.C., & Lee, H.C. (2012). Impulsive personality and risk-taking behavior in motorcycle traffic offenders: A matched controlled study. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(5), 597–602. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.05.007.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Clarke, S., & T Robertson, I. (2005). A meta-analytic review of the Big Five personality factors and accident involvement in occupational and non-occupational settings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(3), 355–376. DOI: 10.1348/096317905X26183.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Czapska, K. (2015). Intellectual processes and psychomotor performance of professional drivers in conventional psychological tests and test2drive. The Polish Journal of Aviation Medicine and Psychology, 21(1), 30–39. DOI: 10.13174/pjamp.21.01.2015.05.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Dahlen, E.R., White, R.P. (2006). The Big Five factors, sensation seeking, and driving anger in the prediction of unsafe driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 903–915.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Endsley, M.R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32–64.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Endsley, M. R. (2015). Situation Awareness Misconceptions and Misunderstandings, Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 9(1), 4–32. DOI: 10.1177/1555343415572631.
Crossref
Google Scholar
M’bailara, K., Atzeni, T., Contrand, B., Derguy, C., Bouvard, M. P., Lagarde, E., & Galéra, C. (2018). Emotional reactivity: Beware its involvement in traffic accidents. Psychiatry Research, 262, 290–294. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.12.019.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Małkiewicz, M.M. (2020). The role of intelligence and temperamental traits in predicting reaction times in movement anticipation tasks: a preliminary study using the PAMT Test2Drive computer test. Occupational Medicine, 71(4), 421–427. DOI: 10.13075/mp.5893.00939.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Olejniczak-Serowiec, A., & Rutkowska, D. (2018). Normative beliefs about breaking road safety rules and their relation to risk-taking. In: MATEC Web of Conferences, 231, 04010. EDP Sciences. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201823104010.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Paśko, W., Śliż, M., Paszkowski, M., Zieliński, J., Polak, K., Huzarski, M., & Przednowek, K. (2021). Characteristics of Cognitive Abilities among Youths Practicing Football. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1371. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18041371.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Potts, C. (1993). Software-engineering research revisited. IEEE software, 10(5), 19–28. DOI: 10.1109/52.232392.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Regulation of the Minister of Health of 8 July 2014 on psychological examinations of persons applying for the right to drive vehicles, drivers and persons performing work as a driver (Journal of Laws of 2014, item 937, as amended). Google Scholar
Schmiedek, F., Lövdén, M., & Lindenberger, U. (2009). On the relation of mean reaction time and intraindividual reaction time variability. Psychology and Aging, 24(4), 841. DOI: 10.1037/a0017799.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Tarnowski, A., & Szostok, K. (2018). Psychological attentional characteristics based on TEST2DRIVE test battery and age as a factor of drivers distraction in LCT and 3VPT simulator scenarios. In: MATEC Web of Conferences, 231, 04012. EDP Sciences. DOI:
Crossref
Google Scholar
1051/matecconf/201823104012. Google Scholar
Treisman, A. (1999). Feature binding, attention and object perception. In: G.W. Humphreys, J. Duncan and A. Treisman (eds.), Attention, Space and Action (91–111). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0284.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Treisman, A., Zhang, W. (2006). Location and binding in visual working memory. Memory and Cognition, 34, 1704–1719. DOI: 10.3758/BF03195932.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Ucińska M. (2021) (ed.). Methodology of psychological research of drivers. Warsaw: WKiŁ. Google Scholar
Ulleberg P., Rundmo T. (2003). Personality, attitudes and risk perception as predictors of risky driving behaviour among young drivers. Safety Science, 41, 427–443. DOI: 10.1016/S0925-7535(01)00077-7.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Ulleberg, P. (2001). Personality subtypes of young drivers. Relationship to risk-taking preferences, accident involvement, and response to a traffic safety campaign. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 4(4), 279–297. DOI: 10.1016/S1369-8478(01)00029-8.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Act of 5 January 2011 on vehicle drivers (Journal of Laws of 2011, No. 30, item 151, as amended). Google Scholar
Act of 6 September 2001 on road transport (Journal of Laws of 2013, item 1414, as amended). Google Scholar
Vaurio, R. G., Simmonds, D. J., & Mostofsky, S. H. (2009). Increased intra-individual reaction time variability in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder across response inhibition tasks with different cognitive demands. Neuropsychology, 47(12), 2389–2396. Google Scholar
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.022.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2008). Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm. Trends in cognitive sciences, 12(11). DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.005.
Crossref
Google Scholar
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.