The Test2Drive system in driver assessments: relationships between theory, law and practice

Adam Tarnowski

Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6687-8420


Abstract

abst


Keywords:

Driver tests, psychomotor fitness, personality, databases, apparatus tests, psychological dysfunctions


Bonnet, G., Debanne, T., & Laffaye, G. (2020). Toward a better theoretical and practical understanding of field players’ decision-making in handball: A systematic review. Movement Sport Sciences, 4, 1–19. DOI: 10.1051/sm/2020008.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Broadbent, D.E, Cooper P.F, FitzGerald P., & Parkes K.R. (1982). The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21, 1–16. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1982.tb01421.x.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Cheng, A. S., Ng, T.C., & Lee, H.C. (2012). Impulsive personality and risk-taking behavior in motorcycle traffic offenders: A matched controlled study. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(5), 597–602. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.05.007.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Clarke, S., & T Robertson, I. (2005). A meta-analytic review of the Big Five personality factors and accident involvement in occupational and non-occupational settings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(3), 355–376. DOI: 10.1348/096317905X26183.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Czapska, K. (2015). Intellectual processes and psychomotor performance of professional drivers in conventional psychological tests and test2drive. The Polish Journal of Aviation Medicine and Psychology, 21(1), 30–39. DOI: 10.13174/pjamp.21.01.2015.05.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Dahlen, E.R., White, R.P. (2006). The Big Five factors, sensation seeking, and driving anger in the prediction of unsafe driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 903–915.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Endsley, M.R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32–64.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Endsley, M. R. (2015). Situation Awareness Misconceptions and Misunderstandings, Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 9(1), 4–32. DOI: 10.1177/1555343415572631.
Crossref   Google Scholar

M’bailara, K., Atzeni, T., Contrand, B., Derguy, C., Bouvard, M. P., Lagarde, E., & Galéra, C. (2018). Emotional reactivity: Beware its involvement in traffic accidents. Psychiatry Research, 262, 290–294. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.12.019.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Małkiewicz, M.M. (2020). The role of intelligence and temperamental traits in predicting reaction times in movement anticipation tasks: a preliminary study using the PAMT Test2Drive computer test. Occupational Medicine, 71(4), 421–427. DOI: 10.13075/mp.5893.00939.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Olejniczak-Serowiec, A., & Rutkowska, D. (2018). Normative beliefs about breaking road safety rules and their relation to risk-taking. In: MATEC Web of Conferences, 231, 04010. EDP Sciences. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201823104010.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Paśko, W., Śliż, M., Paszkowski, M., Zieliński, J., Polak, K., Huzarski, M., & Przednowek, K. (2021). Characteristics of Cognitive Abilities among Youths Practicing Football. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1371. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18041371.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Potts, C. (1993). Software-engineering research revisited. IEEE software, 10(5), 19–28. DOI: 10.1109/52.232392.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Regulation of the Minister of Health of 8 July 2014 on psychological examinations of persons applying for the right to drive vehicles, drivers and persons performing work as a driver (Journal of Laws of 2014, item 937, as amended).   Google Scholar

Schmiedek, F., Lövdén, M., & Lindenberger, U. (2009). On the relation of mean reaction time and intraindividual reaction time variability. Psychology and Aging, 24(4), 841. DOI: 10.1037/a0017799.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Tarnowski, A., & Szostok, K. (2018). Psychological attentional characteristics based on TEST2DRIVE test battery and age as a factor of drivers distraction in LCT and 3VPT simulator scenarios. In: MATEC Web of Conferences, 231, 04012. EDP Sciences. DOI:
Crossref   Google Scholar

1051/matecconf/201823104012.   Google Scholar

Treisman, A. (1999). Feature binding, attention and object perception. In: G.W. Humphreys, J. Duncan and A. Treisman (eds.), Attention, Space and Action (91–111). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0284.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Treisman, A., Zhang, W. (2006). Location and binding in visual working memory. Memory and Cognition, 34, 1704–1719. DOI: 10.3758/BF03195932.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Ucińska M. (2021) (ed.). Methodology of psychological research of drivers. Warsaw: WKiŁ.   Google Scholar

Ulleberg P., Rundmo T. (2003). Personality, attitudes and risk perception as predictors of risky driving behaviour among young drivers. Safety Science, 41, 427–443. DOI: 10.1016/S0925-7535(01)00077-7.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Ulleberg, P. (2001). Personality subtypes of young drivers. Relationship to risk-taking preferences, accident involvement, and response to a traffic safety campaign. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 4(4), 279–297. DOI: 10.1016/S1369-8478(01)00029-8.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Act of 5 January 2011 on vehicle drivers (Journal of Laws of 2011, No. 30, item 151, as amended).   Google Scholar

Act of 6 September 2001 on road transport (Journal of Laws of 2013, item 1414, as amended).   Google Scholar

Vaurio, R. G., Simmonds, D. J., & Mostofsky, S. H. (2009). Increased intra-individual reaction time variability in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder across response inhibition tasks with different cognitive demands. Neuropsychology, 47(12), 2389–2396.   Google Scholar

DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.022.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2008). Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm. Trends in cognitive sciences, 12(11). DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.005.
Crossref   Google Scholar


Published
2021-12-22

Cited by

Tarnowski, A. (2021). The Test2Drive system in driver assessments: relationships between theory, law and practice. The Review of Psychology, 64(1), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.31648/przegldpsychologiczny.7790

Adam Tarnowski 
Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6687-8420