“Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself”? The relationship of self-care with empathy and altruistic behavior
Aleksandra Pilarska
Department of Personality Psychology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9507-8710
Anna Suchańska
WSB University in Poznańhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4462-7588
Abstract
Aim
The aim of the study was to investigate whether self-care, understood as a set of functions ensuring one’s own safety and personal development, promotes a tendency toward empathy and altruism.
Method
The study was conducted online on a group of 331 people, using the Self-Care Questionnaire, the Empathic Sensitiveness Scale, the Altruism Questionnaire, and the Social Desirability Questionnaire. The data was analyzed using both a variable-centered and a person-centered approach.
Results
Results obtained through path analysis revealed that the association between self-care capacity and engaging in altruistic behavior was mediated by tendencies toward empathic concern and perspective-taking. Self-care contributed to willingness to behave for the benefit of others, as it fostered other-oriented empathy. Cluster analysis results confirmed that properly developed abilities to protect and care for oneself were accompanied by empathic sensitivity to the welfare of others and willingness to engage in altruistic behavior. Notwithstanding, the results also indicated that self-care deficits do not preclude engaging in helping activities when they allow one to reduce one’s own empathic suffering.
Conclusions
Results obtained through correlation-regression and cluster analyses demonstrated that self‑care promotes mature empathizing – associated with empathic concern and perspective-taking – and engaging in selfless actions for the benefit of others.
Keywords:
self-care, altruism, empathic concern, personal distress, perspective-takingReferences
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226–244.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. (2004). Wyczerpywanie się ego i funkcja wykonawcza Ja [Ego depletion and the self’s executive function]. In A. Tesser, R. B. Felson, & J. M. Suls (Eds.), Ja i tożsamość [Psychological perspectives on self and identity] (pp. 18–42). Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne. Google Scholar
Berne, E. (1998). Dzień dobry… i co dalej [What do you say after you say hello]? Poznań: Dom Wydawniczy Rebis. Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (2007). Przywiązanie [Attachment]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. Google Scholar
Cichocka, A., & Bilewicz, M. (2010). Co się kryje w nieistotnych efektach statystycznych? Możliwości zastosowania analizy supresji w psychologii społecznej [What is hidden in nonsignificant effects? Application of suppression analysis in social psychology]. Psychologia Społeczna [Social Psychological Bulletin], 5(14), 191–198. Google Scholar
Collins, N. L., & Ford, M. B. (2010). Responding to the needs of others: The caregiving behavioral system in intimate relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(2), 235–244.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
Curran, P. G. (2016). Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 4–19,
Crossref
Google Scholar
Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85. Google Scholar
Davis, M. H. (2001). Empatia. O umiejętności współodczuwania [Empathy. A social psychological approach]. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne. Google Scholar
Drwal, R. Ł., & Wilczyńska, J. T. (1995). Opracowanie Kwestionariusza Aprobaty Społecznej Google Scholar
(KAS) [Elaboration of the Social Desirability Questionnaire (SDQ)]. In P. Brzozowski & P. Oleś (Eds.), Adaptacja kwestionariuszy osobowości [Adaptation of personality questionnaires] (pp. 57–66). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. Google Scholar
Erikson, E. H. (2002). Dopełniony cykl życia [The life cycle completed]. Poznań: Dom Wydawniczy REBIS. Google Scholar
Erikson, E. H., Erikson, J. M., & Kivnick, H. Q. (1989). Vital involvement in old age. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. Google Scholar
Freud, A. (1963). The concept of developmental lines. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 18, 245–265.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Freud, S. (2004). Wstęp do psychoanalizy [A general introduction to psychoanalysis]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. Google Scholar
Hartmann, H. (1958). Ego psychology and the problem of adaptation. New York: International University Press.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Joireman, J. A., Needham, T. L., & Cummings, A.-L. (2002). Relationships between dimensions of attachment and empathy. North American Journal of Psychology, 4(1), 63–80. Google Scholar
Karbowa, M. (2012). Behawioralna obserwacja fenomenów „bezpiecznej przystani” i „bezpiecznej bazy eksploracji” jako przykład pomiaru zachowań opiekuńczych w związku romantycznym [Behavioral observation of “secure haven” and “secure exploration base” phenomena as an example of measuring caregiving behaviors in romantic relationship]. In W. J. Paluchowski, A. Bujacz, P. Haładziński, & L. Kaczmarek (Eds.), Nowoczesne metody badawcze w psychologii [Modern research methods in psychology] (pp. 127–143). Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe WNS UAM. Google Scholar
Karyłowski, J. (1982). O dwóch typach altruizmu [On two types of altruism]. Wrocław: Ossolineum. Google Scholar
Kaźmierczak, M., Plopa, M., & Retowski, S. (2007). Skala wrażliwości empatycznej [Empathic Sensitiveness Scale]. Przegląd Psychologiczny [Review of Psychology], 50(1), 9–24. Google Scholar
Kernberg, O. F. (1976). Object-relations theory and clinical psychoanalysis. New York: Aronson. Google Scholar
Kestenbaum, R., Farber, E. A., & Sroufe, L. A. (1989). Individual differences in empathy among preschoolers: Relation to attachment history. New Directions for Child Development, 44, 51–64.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Khantzian, E. J., & Mack, J. E. (1983). Self-preservation and the care of the self: Ego instincts reconsidered. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 38, 209–232.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Kozłowska, J. (2005). Style przywiązania a funkcje samoopiekuńcze [Attachment styles and self-care functions]. Niepublikowana praca magisterska [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Poznań: Instytut Psychologii UAM. Google Scholar
Krystal, H. (1978). Self representation and the capacity for self care. Annual of Psychoanalysis, 6, 209–246. Google Scholar
Łaguna, M., Lachowicz-Tabaczek, K., & Dzwonkowska, I. (2007). Skala samooceny SES Morrisa Rosenberga – polska adaptacja metody [The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Polish adaptation of the scale]. Psychologia Społeczna [Social Psychological Bulletin], 2(2), 164–176. Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Grayson, D. (2005). Goodness of Fit in Structural Equation Models. In A. Maydeu-Olivares & J. J. McArdle (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics: A festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 275–340). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Maslow, A. (2009). Motywacja i osobowość [Motivation and personality]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. Google Scholar
Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 437–455.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2017). An attachment perspective on compassion and altruism. In P. Gilbert (Ed.), Compassion: Concepts, research and applications (pp. 187–202). London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Pilarska, A., & Suchańska, A. (2021a, May). W trosce o troskę. Charakterystyka i pomiar samoopiekuńczości [In caring for care. Characteristics and measurement of self-care]. Paper on XXIX Ogólnopolska Konferencja Psychologii Rozwojowej [29th National Conference on Developmental Psychology] entitled Współczesne drogi rozwoju – między obawą a nadzieją [Contemporary paths of development – between fear and hope]. Warszawa, Polska. Google Scholar
Pilarska, A., & Suchańska, A. (2021b, October). Konstrukcja i walidacja Kwestionariusza samoopiekuńczości (KSO) [Construction and validation of the Self-Care Questionnaire (SCQ)]. Paper on IV Krajowa Konferencja Psychologii Klinicznej [4th National Conference on Clinical Psychology] entitled Psychologia kliniczna w teorii i praktyce oddziaływań psychologicznych [Clinical psychology in the theory and practice of psychological interventions]. Poznań, Polska. Google Scholar
Rhodewalt, F., & Morf, C. C. (1995). Self and interpersonal correlates of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory: A review and new findings. Journal of Research in Personality, 29(1), 1–23.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
Śliwak, J. (2005). Altruizm i jego pomiar. Kwestionariusz A–N [Altruism and its measurement. The Questionnaire A–N]. Roczniki Psychologiczne [Annals of Psychology], 8(1), 121–144. Google Scholar
Śliwak, J. (2014). Kwestionariusz A–N (wersja skrócona) [Questionnaire A–N (shortened version)]. Niepublikowane narzędzie [Unpublished instrument]. Lublin: Instytut Psychologii KUL. Google Scholar
Stawicka, M. (2008). Autodestruktywność dziecięca w świetle teorii przywiązania [Self-destructiveness in children – the attachment theory perspective]. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM. Google Scholar
Suchańska, A. (1998). Przejawy i uwarunkowania psychologiczne pośredniej autodestruktywności [Psychological manifestations and conditions of indirect self-destructiveness]. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM. Google Scholar
Suchańska, A. (2001). W poszukiwaniu wyjaśnień samoniszczenia. Samoniszczenie a kompetencje samoopiekuńcze [In search of explanations for self-destructiveness. Self-destructiveness and self-care competence]. Forum Oświatowe [Educational Forum], 2(25), 61–73. Google Scholar
Suchańska, A., Pilarska, A., & Brzeg, J. (2019). Przywiązanie i kompetencje samoopiekuńcze w wyjaśnianiu pośredniej autodestrukcyjności [Attachment and capacity for self-care in explaining chronic self-destructiveness]. Psychologia Rozwojowa [Developmental Psychology], 24(1), 43–51.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Xiang, Y., Wang, Y., Gao, S., Zhang, X., & Cui, R. (2018). Neural mechanisms with respect to different paradigms and relevant regulatory factors in empathy for pain. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12, 507.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Department of Personality Psychology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9507-8710
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.