Judges, forensic specialist, non-professionals decisions to interfere in family with children problems.
Aleksandra Sobotka
Uniwersytet SWPS w Warszawie, Instytut Psychologiihttps://orcid.org/0009-0009-7443-9239
Abstract
This article aims to present the results of a survey of judges (N=44), other forensic professionals (N=51), and non-professionals (N=55). I was interested to see whether the opinions of professionals on the degree of accepted government intervention in the family structure correspond with the non-professional views of average citizens.
The results revealed that, in general, all the groups surveyed: judges, professionals who diagnose families, and non-professionals prefer supportive actions over intervention. With the intensity of the child’s problems, the frequency of proposing actions that imply intervention in the family structure increases. Non-professionals take a more radical view, more often proposing intervention actions than other groups. The opinions of judges and forensic professionals who diagnose the family situation do not differ significantly in this case. Forensic professionals are the group that indicated the most supportive actions in the survey. The results imply that self-enhancement had a moderation effect on the proposing intervention actions.
Keywords:
family, judges, children problemsReferences
Bardi, A., Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behavior: strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(10), 1207–1220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203254602 Google Scholar
Bartkowicz, Z. (2013). Agresywność, kompetencje społeczne i samoocena resocjalizowanych nieletnich a ich przestępczość w okresie dorosłości. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Google Scholar
Bornstein, B. H., Miller, M. K. (2009). Does a judge’s religion influence decision Making? Court Review, 45(3), 112–115. Google Scholar
Boski, P. (2022). Kulturowe ramy zachowań społecznych (wyd. 2). Wydawnictwo PWN. Google Scholar
Brooks, E. M., Thomas, S. (1997). The perception and judgment of senior baccalaureate student nurses in clinical decision making. Advances in Nursing Science, 19(3), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-199703000-00006 Google Scholar
Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej. (2023). Przemoc wobec dzieci – opinie, doświadczenia, reagowanie (Komunikat z badań, Nr 110/2023). https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2023/K_110_23.PDF Google Scholar
Conroy, M., Hess, R. D., Azuma, H., Kashiwagi, K. (1980). Maternal strategies for regulating children's behavior: Japanese and American families. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 11(2), 153–172. Google Scholar
Czarnecka-Dzialuk, B., Wójcik, D. (2011). Stosowanie sądowych środków oddziaływania wobec nieletnich w świetle koncepcji teoretycznych, statystyk oraz opinii sędziów i kuratorów rodzinnych. https://iws.gov.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/AR_Wójcik.-Czarnecka-DzialukStos.sÄ…dowych-Å%E2%80%BAr.-oddz.-wobec-niel.pdf Google Scholar
Drapała, K., Kulma, R. (2014). Powrotność do przestępstwa nieletnich opuszczających zakłady poprawcze [raport z badań]. Prawo w działaniu, 19, 204–246. Google Scholar
Eisenberg, T., Hannaford‐Agor, P. L., Hans, V. P., Waters, N. L., Munsterman, G. T., Schwab, S. J., Wells, M. T. (2005). Judge‐Jury agreement in criminal cases: A partial replication of Kalven and Zeisel’s The American Jury. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2(1), 171–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2005.00035.x Google Scholar
Englich, B., Mussweiler, T., Strack, F. (2006). Playing dice with criminal sentences: The influence of irrelevant anchors on experts’ judicial decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(2), 188‒200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205282152 Google Scholar
Feather, N. T. (1985). Attitudes, values, and attributions: Explanations of unemployment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 876–889. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.876 Google Scholar
Feather, N. T. (1988). Values, valences, and course enrollment: Testing the role of personal values within an expectancy-valence framework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.381 Google Scholar
Feather, N. T. (1994). Human values and their relation to justice. Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01201.x Google Scholar
Feather, N. T. (1995). Values, valences, and choice: The influences of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(6), 1135–1151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1135 Google Scholar
Feather, N. T., Newton, J. W. (1982). Values, expectations, and the prediction of social action: An expectancy-valence analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 6, 217–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992246 Google Scholar
Feather, N. T., O’Brien, G. E. (1987). Looking for employment: An expectancy–valence analysis of job‐seeking behaviour among young people. British Journal of Psychology, 78(2), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1987.tb02244.x Google Scholar
Flannery, D. J., Hussey, D., Jefferis, E. (2005). Adolescent delinquency and violent behavior. W: T. P. Gullotta i G. R. Adams (red.), Handbook of adolescent behavioral problems: Evidence-based approaches to prevention and treatment (s. 415–438). Springer. Google Scholar
Givelber, D., Farrell, A. (2008). Judges and juries: The defense case and differences in acquittal rates. Law & Social Inquiry, 33(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2008.00093.x Google Scholar
Grusec, J. E., Goodnow, J. J., Kuczynski, L. (2000). New directions in analyses of parenting contributions to children’s acquisition of values. Child Development, 71(1), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00135 Google Scholar
Guthrie, C., Rachlinski, J. J., Wistrich, A. J. (2002). Judging by heuristic: Cognitive illusions in judicial decision making. Cornell Law Faculty Publications, 862, 44–50. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1733&context=facpub Google Scholar
Harkness, S., Super, C. (1995). Culture and parenting. W: M. Bornstein (red.), Handbook of parenting (t. 2), Biology, and ecology of parenting (s. 211–233). Erlbaum. Google Scholar
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., Gupta, V. (red.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations. The Globe study of 62 societies. Sage Publications. Google Scholar
Idleman, S. C. (2005). The concealment of religious values in judicial decision making. Virginia Law Review, 91(2), 515–534. Google Scholar
Kagitcibasi, C. (2002). A model of family change in cultural context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1059. Google Scholar
Kagitcibasi, C. (2007). Family, self, and human development across cultures: Theories and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Google Scholar
Kalven, H., Zeisel, H. (1966). The American Jury. Little, Brown and Company. Google Scholar
Kelly, J. L., Tseng, H.-M. (1992). Cultural differences in child rearing: A comparison of immigrant Chinese and Caucasian American mothers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 23(4), 444–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022192234002 Google Scholar
Kerig, P. K., Becker, S. P. (2015). Early abuse and neglect as risk factors for the development of criminal and antisocial behavior. W: J. Morizot i L. Kazemian (red.), The development of criminal and antisocial behavior (s. 181–199). Springer. Google Scholar
Klein, M. (1987). Selected Melanie Klein (J. Mitchell, red.). Simon and Schuster. Google Scholar
Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 2 kwietnia 1997 r. Dz.U. 1997 nr 78, poz. 483 (1997) (Polska). Sejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. https://www.sejm.gov.pl/prawo/konst/polski/kon1.htm. Google Scholar
Konwencja o prawach dziecka z dnia 20 listopada 1989 r. (tj. Dz.U. z 2021 r., poz. 2117). https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU19911200526 Google Scholar
Leśniak, B., Leśniak, M. (2016). Z badań nad czynnikami wpływającymi na podejmowanie decyzji o wymiarze kary. Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie/Politechnika Śląska, 95, 261–273. Google Scholar
Mullen, E., Skitka, L. J. (2006). Exploring the psychological underpinnings of the moral mandate effect: Motivated reasoning, group differentiation, or anger? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 629–643. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.629 Google Scholar
Ostrowska, K., Tatarowicz, J. (red). (1998). Agresja i przemoc w szkołach polskich i niemieckich: materiały z polsko– niemieckiej konferencji naukowej. Centrum Metodyczne Pomocy Psychologiczno- Pedagogicznej Ministerstwa Edukacji Narodowej. Google Scholar
Partyk, A. (2023). Czy sędziowie mają intuicję?: przyczynek do rozważań o sędziowskich mechanizmach decyzyjnych. Oficyna Wydawnicza Humanitas. Google Scholar
Plopa, M. (2007). Psychologia rodziny: teoria i badania. Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls. Google Scholar
Rachlinski, J. J., Guthrie, C., Wistrich, A. J. (2007). Heuristics and biases in bankruptcy judges. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 163(1), 167–186. Google Scholar
Rode, D. (2010). Psychologiczne uwarunkowania przemocy w rodzinie: charakterystyka sprawców. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego. Google Scholar
Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H. (1995). Value priorities and readiness for out-group social contact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(3), 437–448. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.437 Google Scholar
Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H. (2004). Values, intelligence and client behavior in career counseling: A field study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(3), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173222 Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universal in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. W: M. Zanna (red.), Advances in experimental social psychology (t. 25, s. 1–65). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6 Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. W: R. Jowell, C. Roberts, R. Fitzgerald, G. Eva (red.), Measuring attitudes cross-nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey (s. 169–203). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209458.n9 Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., Barnea, M. (1995). Los valores en orientaciones politicas: Aplicaciones en Espana, Venezuela y Mejico. Psychologia Politica, 11, 15–40. Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., Ramos, A., Verkasalo, M., Lönnqvist, J.-E., Demirutku, K., Dirilen-Gumus, O., Konty, M. (2012). Refining the Theory of Basic Individual Values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029393 Google Scholar
Simon, H., Chase, W. (1988). Skill in chess. W: D. Levy (red.), Computer chess compendium (s. 175–188). Springer New York. Google Scholar
Skitka, L. J. (2006). Legislating morality: How deep is the U.S. Supreme Court’s reservoir of good will? [referat]. International Society for Justice Research, Berlin, Niemcy. Google Scholar
Songer, D. R., Tabrizi, S. J. (1999). The religious right in court: The decision making of Christian evangelicals in state supreme courts. The Journal of Politics, 61(2), 507–526. Google Scholar
Stanik, J. M. (2005). Warunki opiekuńczo-wychowawcze w rodzinie, radzenie sobie z wymaganiami szkolnymi a stopień ryzyka przestępczości nieletnich. W: J. M. Stanik i L. Woszczek (red.), Przestępczość nieletnich. Aspekty psychospołeczne i prawne (s. 87–104). Wydawnictwo UŚ. Google Scholar
Super, C. M, Harkness, S. (1997). The cultural structuring of child development. W: J. W. Berry, P. R. Dasen, T. S. Saraswathi (red.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. Vol 2: Basic processes and human development (s. 1–39). Allyn and Bacon. Google Scholar
Super, C. M., Harkness, S., van Tijen, N., van der Vlugt, J., Dijkstra, J., Fintelman, M. (1996). The three R’s of Dutch childrearing and the socialization of infant arousal. W: S. Harkness, C. M. Super (red.), Parents’ cultural belief systems: Their origins, expression, and consequences (s. 447–466). Guilford Press. Google Scholar
Szecówka, A. (2013). Powrotność na drogę przestępczą nieletnich zwolnionych z różnych typów zakładów poprawczych. W: B. Jezierska, A. Rejzner, P. Szczepaniak, A. Szecówka (red.), Profilaktyka i resocjalizacja w nurtach inkluzji. Doświadczenia, problemy, perspektywy międzynarodowe (s. 339–361). Wydawnictwo UW. Google Scholar
Szymanowska, A. (2004). Więźniowie młodociani poddani systemowi programowego oddziaływania na podstawie badań psychologiczno-kryminologicznych. Archiwum Kryminologii, 26, 53–100. Google Scholar
Szymański, A. (2010). Niedostosowanie społeczne dzieci i młodzieży: wybrane problemy. Wydawnictwo WSP TWP. Google Scholar
Ustawa z dnia 9 czerwca 2022 r. o wspieraniu i resocjalizacji nieletnich Dz.U. 2022 poz. 1700 (2022) (Polska). https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20220001700/T/D20221700L.pdf Google Scholar
Włodarczyk-Madejska, J. (2020). Efektywność środków izolacyjnych orzekanych wobec nieletnich. Prawo w Działaniu, 43, 172–210. https://doi.org/10.32041/pwd.4310 Google Scholar
Zolkoski, S. M., Bullock, L. M. (2012). Resilience in children and youth: A review. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(12), 2295–2303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.08.009 Google Scholar
Uniwersytet SWPS w Warszawie, Instytut Psychologii
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7443-9239
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.