On the nature and artifact (nine woven fragments). Hommage to Francisco Infante
Michel Constantini
Université Paris 8 Vincennes – Saint-DenisAbstract
This article follows our several previous studies in Russian art of the XXth century. It is dedicated to Francisco Infante-Arana (born 1943), Russian painter of Spanish origin, creator of a “new artistic language” (State Prize of the Russian Federation, 1996), author of an original theory of art developed since 1976 and named the “concept of artifact”. If the spiritual continuity between the work of Francisco Infante and that of Kazimir Malevich has already been established for a long time as a commonplace in contemporary art studies (just remember the title of a series of works by Francisco Infante, “Suprematic Games. Hommage to Malevich”, 1968, from the cycle “Spontaneous Games in Nature”), the relationship between the inventor of the concept of artifact and the founder of the abstractionism in painting, Wassily Kandinsky (1866–1944), has not yet been a subject of targeted research. In our current study, we propose to address this uneasy issue by returning to the origins of the philosophical thought, and namely to the speculations on the phenomena of art in their relation to the phenomena of nature. This approach seems justified insofar as the abstractionism radically challenges the very foundations of art, reposing, since ancient times, on the primacy of mimesis, and rebuild this ruined aesthetic system, paradoxically, on the principles which, having been scrutinized more closely, seem not to lack some affinity with the worldview of the first “philosophers”, so-called Presocratics. Thus, our purpose will be to raise the first elements of the Ancient Greek thought that appear at the base of the artistic creation and theoretical representations of Francisco Infante.
Keywords:
Francisco Infante Kazimir Malevich Wassily Kandinsky Russian Avant-garde Abstract Art Artifact Pre-Socratic PhilosophyReferences
Benveniste, E. (1966), Problèmes de Linguistique Générale 1. Paris.
Chambard, M. (2010), L’art non officiel soviétique de l’U.R.S.S. à l’Occident de 1956 à 1986. Oskar Rabine et la revue A-Ya. In: <https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-00537633>.
Costantini, M. (1981), Sur le névé de l’art – réflexions à propos de l’Hommage à Malevitch de F. Infante. In: A-JA/A-YA/A-Я. Art russe non officiel. 3, 10–11.
Costantini, M. (1992), La génération Thalès. Avant/Après. Paris.
Costantini, M. (1997), Don et partage: propositions sémiotiques. In: Mémoires de la Société Archéologique de Touraine. LXIII, 131–139.
Costantini, M. (2000), Qu’Aristote connaissait la musique ou De l’harmonie chez les natifs de Stagire (et quelques autres sans nul doute). In: Carraud, Chr. (éd.), L’harmonie. Orléans, 193–203.
Costantini, M. (2002), L’image du Sujet. Paris.
Costantini, M. (éd.) (2013), Glissements, décentrements, déplacement. Pour un dialogue sémiotique franco-russe. Saint-Denis. In: <http://octaviana.fr/document/COLN3_1>.
Damisch, H. (1972), Théorie du /nuage/Pour une histoire de la peinture. Paris.
Dumont, J. P. (éd.) (1991), Les Écoles présocratiques. Paris.
Erasmus, D. (1528), Dialogus De recta latini græcique sermonis pronuntiatione. Lugdunum Batavorum, 1643 [En ligne].
Greimas, A. J. (1973), Un problème de sémiotique narrative: les objets de valeur. In: Langages. 8/31, 13–35.
Infante, F. [Инфанте, Ф.] (2004), Артефакты, ретроспектива. Москва.
Lacoste, Y. (1976), La géographie, ça sert, d’abord, à faire la guerre. Paris.
Leibniz, G. W. (1714), Principes de la nature et de la grâce fondés en raison. In: <https://fr.wikisource.org/.../Principes_de_la_nature_et_de_la_grâce_fondés_en_raison>.
Malévitch, K. (1981), La lumière et la couleur: textes de 1918 à 1926. Lausanne.
Tzetzès, J. (1180; 1826), Βιβλίον ἱστορικὸν τὸ διὰ στίχων πολιτικῶν. Ed. Kiessling. Leipzig.
Université Paris 8 Vincennes – Saint-Denis
