Estimation of effectiveness of usage of liquid organic fertilizer in the context of rational land use: a case study of Ukraine
Anatoliy Kucher
National Scientific Center «Institute for Soil Science and Agrochemistry Research named after O.N.Sokolovsky» KyivAbstract
The purpose of the article – to perform comparative analysis of the economic effectiveness of the 10 samples of organic fertilizer of pig farm, bio humus “Humivit” and mineral fertilizers (Nitroamofoska, ammonium nitrate, carbamide) on the example of oats. The study used the following methods: abstract-logical, cash-analytical, cash-equivalent, expert, monographic. The research was done in Ukraine. The results of the comparative analysis of economic effectiveness of the 10 samples of organic pig fertilizer, bio humus “Humivit” and mineral fertilizers (Nitroamofoska, ammonium nitrate, carbamide) in the example of oats on the green mass show that the use of organic fertilizers sample number 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10 is an economically effective, while organic fertilizers of sample number 7, 8, 9 are economically inefficient. By the main indicators of economic effectiveness (coefficients of payback, conditional additional profit, level of profitability) organic fertilizers sample number 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10 have significant competitive advantages over the studied brands of mineral fertilizers and bio humus “Humivit”. The use of organic pig fertilizers, except the sample number 8, in economic terms for the impact on potential soil fertility is more effective than bio humus “Humivit”. The most significant economic benefits for the impact on potential soil fertility are samples of organic fertilizers pig number 1, 5, 10, whose application generates the lowest cost price of humus. The element of novelty is that with using the author’s scientific and methodical approach it was conducted the estimation of economic effectiveness of the liquid organic fertilizer of pig farm for the impact on potential soil fertility.
Keywords:
liquid organic fertilizer economic effectiveness cost coefficients of payback pig farm oat potential soil fertility UkraineReferences
Bosak, V. N. (2005), Agroeconomic efficiency of fertilizer use. Minsk.
Bosak, V. N. (2010), Economic and energetic efficiency the use of organic fertilizers. In: Scientific works the Belarusian State Economic University, 52–56.
Cherenkov, A. V./Rybka, V. S. and other (2014), Scientific and practical guide to the substantiation of sample labor standards, monetary and material and energy costs of producing crops. Dnipropetrovsk.
Dubey, A./Dubey, D. K. (2017), Evaluation of cost effective organic fertilizers, Research & Development Centre, Kilpest India Ltd. In: <http://orgprints.org/17043/1/17043.pdf>.
Enujeke, E. C./Ojeifo, I. M./Nnaji, G. U. (2013), Effects of Liquid Organic Fertilizer on Time of Tasselling, Time of Silking and Grain Yield of Maize (Zea mays). In: Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development. 3/4, 186–192.
Khodakivska, O. (2010), The role of organic fertilizer to improve the environmental situation and increase the fertility of radioactively contaminated soil. In: Zemlevporiadnyi visnyk. 1, 18–22.
Kucher, A. V. (2016), Economic effectiveness of use of liquid organic fertilizers. In: Economika APK. 4, 45–50.
Kucher, A. V./Kucher, L. Yu. (2015), Expert assessment of economic losses caused by soil degradation at agricultural enterprises. In: Actual problems of economics. 8, 165–169.
Lushnikova, О. (2015), Еconomic-mathematical substantiation of efficiency of mineral fertilizer use in agricultural enterprises. In: Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal. 1/2 <www.are-journal.com>.
Leah, T./Leah, N. (2017), Economic and environmental efficiency of fertilizers use for enhance the fertility of degraded soils in the Republic of Moldova. In: <https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen. de/53455/1/MPRA_paper_53455.pdf>.
Leibold, K./Olsen, T. (2017), Value of Manure Nutrients. In: <https://www.extension.iastate.edu/ agdm/livestock/html/b1-65.html>.
Massey, R. (2017), Value of manure as a fertilizer. In: <http://www.delaval.com/ImageVaultFiles/ id_3942/cf_662/ValueofMancarbamidesFertilizerMassey.pdf>.
Monitoring of prices for mineral fertilizers (2016). In: <http://www.iogu.gov.ua/monitoring/>.
Moskalenko, A. M. (2013), Economic evaluation of the use of manure and its influence on formation of soil fertility. In: Visnyk ZhNAEU. 1–2, 308–316.
Estimation of effectiveness of usage of liquid organic fertilizer... 105
Schmitt, M./Rehm, G. (2017), Fertilizing Cropland with Swine Manure. In: <http://www.fao.org/ prods/gap/database/gap/files/905_FERTILIZING_CROPLAND_WITH_SWINE_MANURE. HTM>.
Sendetska, O. V. (2013), The efficiency of the production and use of organic fertilizer made from poultry waste and livestock farms. In: Ekonomika APK. 9, 123–127.
Shedey, L. О./Kucher, A. V. and other (2016), To determine the comparative biological and economic effectiveness of pig organic fertilizers, bio humus “Humivit” and mineral fertilizers: report on research work (final). Kharkiv.
Soeparjono, S. (2016), The Effect of Media Composition and Organic Fertilizer Concentration on the Growth and Yield of Red Ginger Rhizome (Zingiber officinale Rosc.). In: Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia. Vol. 9, 450–455. In: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro. 2016.02.162>.
State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2008), Guidelines regarding the calculation of costs of feed for cattle and poultry in farms of all categories. In: <http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua>.
State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2015), Availability and receipt of grains and oilseeds to enterprises engaged in their storage and processing as of 1 December 2015. Statistical bulletin. Кyiv.
National Scientific Center «Institute for Soil Science and Agrochemistry Research named after O.N.Sokolovsky» Kyiv
