Opublikowane: 2022-07-181

Uwagi de lege lata na tle stosowania art. 168B K.P.K.

Daniel Szmurło
Civitas et Lex
Dział: Nauki prawne
https://doi.org/10.31648/cetl.7073

Abstrakt

The article presents the issue of so-called “subsequent consent” for evidence obtained in the
course of operating surveillance, and interpretation of Art. 168b of the Code of Criminal Procedure
(CCP). The analysis covers, inter alia, the nature of the prosecutor’s decision on the use of evidence
in criminal proceedings as well as the issue of meaning of expression “an offence prosecuted ex officio or a fiscal offence other than the offence, against which the control was directed” in the context of its constitutionality and the possibility of its pro-constitutional interpretation.

Słowa kluczowe:

Article 168b of the Code of Criminal Procedure, evidence, operating surveillance, pro-constitutional interpretation, derivative interpretation

Pobierz pliki

Zasady cytowania

Szmurło, D. (2022). Uwagi de lege lata na tle stosowania art. 168B K.P.K . Civitas Et Lex, 35(3), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.31648/cetl.7073

Cited by / Share

Ta strona używa pliki cookie dla prawidłowego działania, aby korzystać w pełni z portalu należy zaakceptować pliki cookie.