O trudach ostatniej kampanii Antygonosa Monofthalmosa przeciw Eumenesowi. Uwagi na marginesie książki Michała Piekarskiego, Gabiene 316 p.n.e., Bellona, Warszawa 2021, ss. 294

Klaudia Oczachowska

doi:10.31648/ep.8397

Published: 2022-12-071

No. XXIII/2 (2022)

Problems surrounding Antigonus I Monophthalmus’ last campaign against Eumenes. A commentary on Michał Piekarski’s book Gabiene 316 p.n.e. [Gabiene 316 BCE], Bellona, Warszawa 2021, 294 p.

Klaudia Oczachowska

Echa Przeszłości

Section: REVIEW ARTICLES

https://doi.org/10.31648/ep.8397

Abstract

Michał Piekarski’s monograph Gabiene 316 p.n.e. [Gabiene 316 BCE] analyzes the significance of the Battle of Gabiene and its implications for subsequent Wars of the Diadochi. The title could suggest that the main purpose of the book was to reconstruct the epic battle. However, the book begins with the events that took place directly after Antigonus I Monophthalmus’ death to increase the clarity and coherence of the story. The first chapter focuses on the events of 323 BCE, including the plans and measures undertaken by Macedonian nobility, whereas subsequent chapters present these events in a wider context and provide a detailed description of the Battle of Gabiene. The author makes references to other military conflicts which, in his opinion, influenced the balance of power among the Diadochi and ultimately contributed to Antigonus’ victory in 316 BCE. The article analyzes the book’s content and structure, and it makes several suggestions regarding other literary works on the subject. Source materials that were omitted in the analyzed book, but make an important contribution to research on the Hellenistic period, were proposed. Overall, the book received a positive review, and the author was praised for his style, language and ability to capture the reader’s attention, observed in nearly all parts of the book. The reviewed book makes a valuable contribution to Polish bibliography dedicated to the Hellenistic period.

Keywords:

Hellenistic period, Gabiene 316 BCE, wars of the Diadochi

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Klaudia Oczachowska, Beloved Hephaestion – detested Hephaestion , Echa Przeszłości: No. XXV/1 (2024)

Download files

pdf (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Oczachowska, K. (2022). Problems surrounding Antigonus I Monophthalmus’ last campaign against Eumenes. A commentary on Michał Piekarski’s book Gabiene 316 p.n.e. [Gabiene 316 BCE], Bellona, Warszawa 2021, 294 p. Echa Przeszłości, (XXIII/2), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.31648/ep.8397

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Anson E. M., Alexander's Hypaspists and the Argyraspids, „Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte” 30, 1981, s. 117-120.
Google Scholar

Badian E., The death of Parmenio, „Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association” 91, 1960, s. 324-338.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Bennett B., Roberts M., Wojny następców Aleksandra. Dowódcy, kampanie, tajemne spiski i zdrady, Warszawa 2010.
Google Scholar

Bernard P., Hellenistic Arachosia: A Greek Melting Pot in Action, „East and west” 55, 2005, s. 13-34.
Google Scholar

Billows R.A., Antigonos the One-Eyed and the Creation of the Hellenistic State, Berkeley/Los Angeles/Oxford 1997.
Google Scholar

Bosworth A.B., The Historical Setting of Megasthenes' Indica, „Classical philology” 91, 1996, s. 113-127.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Bosworth A.B., The legacy of Alexander the Great. Politics, Warfare, and propaganda under the successors, Oxford 1992.
Google Scholar

Bravo B., Wipszycka E., Historia starożytnych Greków, Tom III: Okres hellenistyczny, Warszawa 1992.
Google Scholar

Errington R.M., Historia świata hellenistycznego 323 – 30 p.n.e., Kraków 2010.
Google Scholar

Hammond N.G.L., Starożytna Macedonia. Początki, instytucje, dzieje, Warszawa 1989.
Google Scholar

Heckel W., Who’s who in the age of Alexander the Great. Prosography of Alexander’s Empire, Oxford 2006.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Kromayer J., Veith G., Anitke Schlachtfelder; Bausteine zu einer antiken Kriegsgeschite, Berlin 1903.
Google Scholar

Lach G., Wojny diadochów 323 – 281 p.n.e., Zabrze 2012.
Google Scholar

Lach G., Ipsos 301 p.n.e., Warszawa 2014.
Google Scholar

Nawotka K., Aleksander Wielki, Wrocław 2004.
Google Scholar

Piekarski M., Hydaspes, Warszawa 2019.
Google Scholar

Piekarski M., Gabiene 316 p.n.e., Warszawa 2021.
Google Scholar

Walbank F.W., A Historical Commentary on Polybius, vol. I, Oxford 1957, s. 589-610.
Google Scholar

Wolny M., Pyrrhos' Beteiligung an der Schlacht bei Ipsos: Überlegungen zur Konzeption des Heldentums bei Plutarch (Pyrrh. 4, 4), „EOS. Commentarii Societatis Philologae Polonorum" 107, 2020, s. 87-108.
Google Scholar