Scientific information discovery and access: A bibliographic review

Blanca Rodríguez Bravo

doi:10.31648/mkks.8322

Opublikowane: 2023-10-041

Nr 19 (2023)

Scientific information discovery and access: A bibliographic review [Zróżnicowanie kanałów dostępu do informacji naukowej: przegląd bibliograficzny]

Blanca Rodríguez Bravo

Media - Kultura - Komunikacja Społeczna

Dział: Artykuły

https://doi.org/10.31648/mkks.8322

Abstrakt

Niniejsze opracowanie przeglądowe oparte jest na analizie oryginalnych badań i wyników z doniesień naukowych. Celem niniejszego artykułu jest wskazanie, gdzie i w jaki sposób informacja naukowa jest znajdowana i pozyskiwana, uwydatnienie roli wyszukiwarek, baz danych, repozytoriów, ogólnosieciowych usług wyszukiwania, akademickich mediów społecznościowych i nielegalnych platform, takich jak Sci-Hub, w tym procesie. Z przeprowadzonych analiz wynika, że pomimo wysiłków bibliotek w zakresie wdrażania usług umożliwiających wyszukiwanie oraz repozytoriów w celu zwiększenia ich roli w dostępie do informacji Google i Google Scholar pozostają wiodącymi wyszukiwarkami informacji naukowej, chociaż bazy danych, takie jak Web of Science, Scopus i PubMed, są również często wykorzystywane przez użytkowników. Ponadto nowe platformy, takie jak ResearchGate i Sci-Hub, odgrywają dużą rolę w dziedzinie dostępu do informacji naukowej.

Słowa kluczowe:

dostęp do informacji naukowej, znajdowalność, kanały znajdowania i dostępu, zachowania związane z poszukiwaniem informacji, informacja naukowa, biblioteki uniwersyteckie

Pobierz pliki

PDF (English)

Zasady cytowania

Rodríguez Bravo, B. (2023). Scientific information discovery and access: A bibliographic review [Zróżnicowanie kanałów dostępu do informacji naukowej: przegląd bibliograficzny]. Media - Kultura - Komunikacja Społeczna, (19). https://doi.org/10.31648/mkks.8322

Cited by / Share

Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Bibliografia

ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee (2012). 2012 top ten trends in academic libraries. A review of the trends and issues affecting academic libraries in higher education. College & Research Libraries News, 6(73), 311–320.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Anglada, Lluís (2012). Bibliotecas universitarias: cabalgando la tecnología, siguiendo al usuario. El profesional de la información, 6(21), nov.–dic., 553–556.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Anglada, Lluís (2014). Are libraries sustainable in a world of free, networked, digital information? El Profesional de la información, 6(23), 603–611.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Ávila-García, Lorena; Ortiz-Repiso, Virginia and Rodríguez-Mateos, David (2015). Herramientas de descubrimiento: ¿una ventanilla única? Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 1(38), e077. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2015.1.1178.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Blankstein, Melissa (2022). Ithaka S+R US Faculty Survey 2021. Report, July 14, 2022. https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.316896.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Blankstein, Melissa and Wolff-Eisenberg, Christine (2019). Ithaka S+R US Faculty Survey 2018. Report, April 12, 2019. Ithaka S+R. Access: https://sr.ithaka.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/SR-Report-US-Faculty-Survey-2018-04122019.pdf.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Borrego, Angel and Anglada, Lluís (2016). Faculty information behaviour in the electronic environment: Attitudes towards searching, publishing and libraries, New Library World, 3/4(117), 173–185.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Breitbach, William (2016). Web-scale discovery: utopian dream or dystopian nightmare 8or maybe something in between)? En: California Academic & Research libraries 2016 Conference. Access: http://conf2016.carl-acrl.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Breitbach-Web-scale-discovery-FINAL.pdf.
Google Scholar

Conrad, Lettie Y. (2017a). Headlines from the discovery files: key publications on scholarly content discoverability, Learned Publishing, 1(30), 31–37.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Conrad, Lettie Y. (2017b). Pathways to a new way of working. Discoverability, Learned Publishing, 1(30), 3–4.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Dempsey, Lorcan (2012). Thirteen ways of looking at libraries, discovery, and the catalog: scale, workflow, attention. Educause Review, December 10.
Google Scholar

Else, Holly (2016). Libraries becoming invisible to junior scholars. THE, December 8. Access: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/libraries-becoming-invisible-junior-scholars.
Google Scholar

Fagan, Jody-Condit; Mandernach, Meris; Nelson, Carl S.; Paulo, Jonathan R. and Saunders, Grover (2012). Usability test results for a discovery tool in an academic library. Information Technology and Libraries, 1(31) March, 83–112. Access: http://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/ital/article/view/1855/1745.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Faherty, Anna (2016). Academic Book Discovery, Evaluation and Access: Insights and opportunities for enhancing the scholarly experience. Access: https://academicbookfuture.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/faherty_academic-book-discovery-full-report.pdf.
Google Scholar

Fernández-Ramos, Andrés; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Alvite-Díez, María Luisa; Santos-De-Paz, Lourdes; Morán-Suárez, María Antonia; Gallego-Lorenzo, Josefa and Olea, Isabel (2019). Evolution of the big deals use in the public universities of the Castile and Leon region, Spain. El Profesional de la Información, 28(6), e280519. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.nov.19.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Gardner, Tracy and Inger, Simon (2016). How readers discover content in scholarly publications. Fernhill: Renew Training.
Google Scholar

Gardner, Tracy and Inger, Simon (2018). How readers discover content in scholarly publications: Trends in reader behavior from 2005 to 2018. Fernhill: Renew Training.
Google Scholar

Inger, Simon and Gardner, Tracy (2013). Library technology in content discovery –evidence from a large-scale reader survey. Insights, 2(26), 120–127.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Long, Matthew P. and Schonfeld, Roger C. (2014). Ithaka S+R US. Library Survey 2013. New York: Ithaka S+R. https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.22787.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Nicholas, David (2008). If we do not understand our users, we will certainly fail. En: The E-Resources Management Handbook 1. United Kingdom Serials Group. Access: http://uksg.metapress.com/content/e2qjfqymrrmg3rqd/fulltext.pdf.
Google Scholar

Nicholas, David; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Xu, Jie; Watkinson, Anthony; Abrizah, A.; Herman, Eti and Świgoń, Marzena (2017). Where and how early career researchers find scholarly information. Learned Publishing, 1(30), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1087.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Nicholas, David; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chèrifa; Xu, Jie; Herman, Eti; Clark, David; Abrizah, Abdullah; Rodriguez-Bravo, Blanca and Świgoń, Marzena (2019). Sci-Hub: The new and ultimate disruptor? View from the front. Learned publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1206.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Nicholas, David; Clark, David and Herman, Eti (2016). ResearchGate: Reputation uncovered. Learned Publishing, 3(29). https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1035.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Nicholas, David, Herman, Eti and Jamali, Hamid R. (2015). Emerging Reputation Mechanisms for Scholars. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. Access: http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC94955/jrc94955.pdf.
Google Scholar

Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Jamali, Hamid; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Dobrowolki, Tom and Pouchot, Stephany (2015). New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation. Learned Publishing, vol. 3(28), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150303.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Nicholas, David; Jamali, Hamid R.; Herman, Eti; Watkinson, Anthony; Abrizah, Abdullah; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Boukacem-Zeghmouri Cherifa; Xu, Jie; Świgoń, Marzena and Polezhaeva, Tatiana (2020). A global questionnaire survey of the scholarly communication attitudes and behaviours of early career researchers. Learned Publishing, 3(33), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1286.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Nicholas, David; Watkinson, Anthony; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Cherifa; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Xu, Jie; Abrizah, Abdullah; Świgoń, Marzena; Clark, David and Herman, Eti (2019). So, are early career researchers the harbingers of change? Learned Publishing, 3(32), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1232.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Niyazov Yuri; Vogel Carl; Price, Richard; Lund, Ben; Judd, David; Akil, Adnan; Schwartzman, Josh and Shron, Max (2016). Open Access Meets Discoverability: Citations to Articles Posted to Academia.edu. PLoS ONE, 2(11), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148257.
Crossref
Google Scholar

OCLC (2009). Online catalogs: what users and librarians want. Dublin: Ohio: OCLC Online Computer Library Center.
Google Scholar

Ollé, Candela and Borrego, Ángel (2010). A qualitative study of the impact of electronic journals on scholarly information behavior, Library & Information Science Research, 3(32), 221–228.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Orduña-Malea, Enrique; Martín-Martín, Alberto and Delgado-López-Cozar, Emilio (2016). ResearchGate como fuente de evaluación científica: desvelando sus aplicaciones bibliométricas. El Profesional de la Información, marzo-abril, 2(25), 303–310.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Perruso, Carol (2016). Undergraduates’ Use of Google vs. Library Resources: A Four-Year Cohort Study. College & Research Libraries, 5(77), 614–630. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.77.5.614.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Pinto, María; Fernández-Marcial, Viviana and Gómez-Camarero, Carmen (2010). The Impact of Information Behaviour in Academic Library Service Quality: a case study of the Science and Technology Area in Spain. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 1(36), 70–78.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Pontis, Sheila; Blandford, Ann; Greifeneder, Eiker; Attalla, Hesham and Neal, David (2015). “Keeping Up to Date: An Academic Researcher’s Information Journey”. Journal of the Association for information Science and Technology, 1(68), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23623.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Priestner, Andy and Marshall, David (2016). Snapshot: a cultural probe study exploring the research and information behavior of postdocs and PhD students at the University of Cambridge. Access: https://futurelib.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/the-snapshot-project.pdf.
Google Scholar

Research Information Network (2009). Creating Catalogues: Bibliographic Records in a networked World. A research Information Network Report.
Google Scholar

Research Information Network (2011). The Value of Libraries for Research and Researchers: a RIN and RLINK Report.
Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Alvite-Díez, María Luisa and Olea, Isabel (2015). La utilización de las revistas electrónicas en la Universidad de León (España): hábitos de consumo y satisfacción de los investigadores. Investigación Bibliotecológica, 66(29), 17–55.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Borges, Maria-Manuel; Fernandes, Alberto-Nuno-Oliveira; Olea-Merino, Isabel and Oliveira, Maria-Joao Carvalho- de (2013). Hábitos de consumo y satisfacción con las revistas electrónicas de los investigadores de las universidades de Coimbra, León y Porto. En: Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo, Fernanda Ribeiro, coord.6º Encontro Ibérico Edicic 2013: Globalizaçao, Ciencia e Informaçao. Porto: Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto: CETAC. MEDIA, 1189–1208.
Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca and Nicholas, David (2019). Reputación y comunicación científica: investigadores españoles en el inicio de su carrera. Profesional de la información, 2(28), e280203. https://doi.org//10.3145/epi.2019.mar.03
Crossref
Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca and Nicholas, David (2020). Descubrir, leer, publicar, compartir y monitorizar el progreso: comportamiento de los investigadores junior españoles. Profesional de la información, 5(29)e290503. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.sep.03.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Simoes, Maria-da-Graça; Freitas, Maria-Cristina-Vieira- de and Frías, José-Antonio (2015). La búsqueda de información en herramientas de descubrimiento y OPAC’s: fortalezas y debilidades. En: XII Congreso ISKO España y II Congreso ISKO España-Portugal. Organización del conocimiento para sistemas de información abiertos. Murcia: Universidad de Murcia.
Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Simoes, Maria da Graça; Freitas, Maria Cristina Vieira de and Frías, José Antonio (2017). Descubrimiento de información científica: ¿todavía misión y visión de la biblioteca académica? El profesional de la información, 26–3, 464–479.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Schonfeld, Roger C. (2014). Does discovery still happen in the library? Roles and strategies for a shifting reality. Ithaka S+R. https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.24914
Crossref
Google Scholar

Schonfeld, Roger C. (2015). Meeting Researchers Where They Start: Streamlining Access to Scholarly Resources. Ithaka S+R. Access: http://www.sr.ithaka.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/SR_Issue_Brief_Meeting_Researchers_Where_They_Start_032615.pdf.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Spezi, Valérie (2016). Is Information-Seeking Behavior of Doctoral Students Changing?: A Review of the Literature (2010–2015). New Review of Academic Librarianship, 1(22), 78–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2015.1127831.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Spezi, Valérie; Creaser, Claire and Conyers, Angela (2015). The impact of Resource Discovery Services (RDS) on usage of electronic content in UK academic libraries: selected results from a UKSG-funded project. Serials Review, 2(41), 85–99.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Tay, Aaron (2016a). Aggregating institutional repositories: a rethink. Musings about librarianship. Access: http://musingsaboutlibrarianship.blogspot.com.es/2016/12/aggregating-institutional-repositories.html#.WFRGRIWcGB0.
Google Scholar

Tennant, Roy (2009). 21st century description and Access”. BiD: textos universitaris de Biblioteconomia, 22. Access: http://www.ub.edu/bid/22/tennant2.htm.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Tenopir, Carol; King, Donald W.; Christian, Lisa and Volentine, Rachel (2015). Scholarly article seeking, reading, and use: a continuing evolution from print to electronic in the sciences and social sciences. Learned Publishing, 2(28), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150203.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Warwick, Clare; Rimmer, Jon; Blandford, Ann; Gow, Jeremy and Buchanan, George (2009). Cognitive economy and satisficing in information seeking: a longitudinal study of undergraduate information behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 12(69), 2402–2415.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Wolff, Christine; Rod, Alisa B. and Schonfeld, Roger C. (2016a). Ithaka S+R US Faculty survey 2015. New York: Ithaka S+R. https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.277685.
Crossref
Google Scholar

Wolff, Christine; Rod, Alisa B. and Schonfeld, Roger C. (2016b). UK Survey of Academics 2015. Ithaka S+R/Jisc/RLUK. New York: Ithaka S+R. https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.282736.
Crossref
Google Scholar