Zmienność i stabilność polskiego procesu cofania /i/ w Teorii Optymalności

Boersma P. & B. Hayes (2001): Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. „Linguistic Inquiry” 32, pp. 45–86.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Boersma P. (1997): How we learn variation, optionality, and probability. „Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences of the University of Amsterdam” 21, pp. 41–58.   Google Scholar

Booij G. (2002): The balance between storage and computation in phonology. [In:] Storage and Computation in the Language Faculty. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics. S. Nooteboom, F. Weerman & F. Wijnen (eds). Dordrecht, pp. 133–156.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Booij G. E. & J. Rubach (1987): Postcyclic versus postlexical rules in Lexical Phonology. „Linguistic Inquiry” 18, pp. 1–44.   Google Scholar

Bybee J. (2001): Phonology and language use. Cambridge.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Chomsky N. & M. Halle (1968): The sound pattern of English. New York.   Google Scholar

Czaplicki B. (2014): Lexicon Based Phonology: Arbitrariness in Grammar. Munich.   Google Scholar

Fukuzawa H. (1999): Theoretical implications of OCP effects on features in Optimality Theory. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.   Google Scholar

Gussmann E. (1987): Contrastive Polish-English consonantal phonology. Warsaw.   Google Scholar

Hay J. (2003): Causes and consequences of word structure. London.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Itô J. & A. Mester (1999): The phonological lexicon. [In:] Handbook of Japanese Linguistics. N. Tsujimura (ed). Oxford, pp. 62–100.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Jakubíček M., A. Kilgarriff, V. Kovář, P. Rychlý & V. Suchomel (2013): The TenTen corpus family. „7th International Corpus Linguistics Conference CL”, pp. 125–127.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Kager R. (1996): On affix allomorphy and syllable counting. [In:] Interfaces in phonology. Studia Grammatica 41. U. Kleinhenz (ed). Berlin, pp. 155–171.   Google Scholar

Kager R. (2000): Surface opacity of metrical structure in Optimality Theory. [In:] The derivational residue in phonology. B. Hermans & M. van Oostendorp (eds). Amsterdam, pp. 207-247.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Kenstowicz M. (1994): Phonology in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA.   Google Scholar

Kiparsky P. (1982): From Cyclic to Lexical Phonology. [In:] The Structure of Phonological Representations, vol. I. H. van der Hulst & N. Smith (eds). Dordrecht, pp. 131–75.   Google Scholar

Langacker R. (1987): Foundations of cognitive grammar, volume 1: theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA.   Google Scholar

Lombardi L. (1999): Positional faithfulness and voicing assimilation in Optimality Theory. „Natural Language & Linguistic Theory” 17, pp. 267–302.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Łubowicz A. (2007): Paradigmatic contrast in Polish. „Journal of Slavic Linguistics” 15, pp. 229–262.   Google Scholar

McCarthy J. & A. Prince (1995): Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. [In:] University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18. J. N. Beckman, L. W. Dickey & S. Urbanczyk (eds). Amherst, MA, pp. 249–384.   Google Scholar

McQueen J. & A. Cutler (1998): Morphology in word recognition. [In:] The handbook of morphology. A. Spencer & A. Zwicky (eds). Oxford, pp. 406–427.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Mester A. (1994): The quantitative trochee in Latin. „Natural Language & Linguistic Theory„ 12, pp. 1–61.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Pater J. (2000): Nonuniformity in English stress: the role of ranked and lexically specific constraints. „Phonology” 17, pp. 237–274.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert J. (2001): Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. [In:] Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. J. L. Bybee & P. J. Hopper (eds). Amsterdam, pp. 137–158.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Prince A. & P. Smolensky (2004): Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in Generative Grammar. Oxford. [Revision of 1993 technical report, Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Sciences. Available on Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA-537.]
Crossref   Google Scholar

Rubach J. & G. Booij (2001): Allomorphy in Optimality Theory: Polish Iotation. „Language” 77, pp. 26–60.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Rubach J. (1984a): Cyclic and lexical phonology: The structure of Polish. Berlin, New York.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Rubach J. (1984b): Segmental rules of English and Cyclic Phonology. „Language” 60, pp. 21–54.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Rubach J. (1997): Extrasyllabic consonants in Polish: Derivational Optimality Theory. [In:] Derivations and Constraints in Phonology. I. Roca (ed). Oxford, pp. 551–581.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Rubach J. (2000): Backness switch in Russian. „Phonology” 17, pp. 39–64.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Rubach J. (2003a): Duke-of-York derivations in Polish. „Linguistic Inquiry” 34, pp. 601–629.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Rubach J. (2003b): Polish palatalization in derivational optimality theory. „Lingua” 113, pp. 197–237.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Rubach J. (2017): Derivational meanders of High Vowel Palatalization in Polish. „Lingua” 199, pp. 1–26.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Sanders R. (2003): Opacity and sound change in the Polish lexicon. PhD dissertation, UC Santa Cruz.   Google Scholar

Steele R. D. (1973): The segmental phonology of contemporary Standard Polish. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.   Google Scholar

Zuraw K. (2000): Patterned exceptions in Phonology. PhD dissertation, University of California.   Google Scholar

Zuraw K. (2010): A model of lexical variation and the grammar with application to Tagalog nasal substitution. „Nat Lang Linguist Theory” 28, pp. 417–472.
Crossref   Google Scholar

„Sketch Engine”, www.sketchengine.eu, accessed: 15.03.2025.   Google Scholar