Supportive social interaction as a concept for describing the situation of persons experiencing an infertility crisis
Abstrakt
Objective: This article presents the definitions and justification of the necessity to introduce the original concept of supportive social interaction into scholarly discourse. Supportive social interaction is understood as a group interaction encompassing speaking or listening in an informal and judgement-free environment, which is connected with the necessity – and also provides an opportunity – to reciprocally disclose the experiences, needs and personal convictions of the persons participating in the said interaction and leads to a reduction of stress. The differences between traditional approaches to support and supportive social interactions and their significance in the treatment of infertility have been outlined in this article.
Theses: Supportive social interactions, a precondition of which is the occurrence of disclosure, vary in terms of quality and function from support in the traditional sense of the word. They are also a source of stress reduction in the process of treating infertility using assisted reproductive technologies.
Conclusion: Supportive social interactions are increasingly important in the context of infertility treatment. The proposed concept is an essential element describing the functioning of persons experiencing an infertility crisis.
Słowa kluczowe:
Supportive social interactions, social support, infertility, disclosureBibliografia
Bielawska-Batorowicz, E. (2006). Psychologiczne aspekty prokreacji [Psychological aspects of procreation]. Wydawnictwo Śląsk. Google Scholar
Bishop, G. D. (2000). Psychologia zdrowia ‒ zintegrowany umysl i ciało [Health Psychology – Integrated Body and Mind] (1st ed.). Wydawnictwo ASTRUM. Google Scholar
Bloom, J., Kang, S., & Romano, P. (1991). Cancer and stress: the effect of social support as a resource. In C. L. Cooper & M. Watson (Eds.), Cancer and Stress. Biological and Coping Studies (pp. 95–124.) Wiley. Google Scholar
Boivin, J., Scanlan, L., Walker, S. (1999). Why are infertile patients not using psychosocial counseling? Human Reproduction, 14, 1384–1391. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.5.1384
Crossref
Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv26071r6
Crossref
Google Scholar
Caplan, G. (1974). Support systems and community mental health: Lectures on concept development. Behavioral Publications. Google Scholar
Chanduszko-Salska, J., & Kossakowska, K. (2018). Stres a objawy depresji i sposoby radzenia sobie u kobiet z niepłodnością i kobiet w ciąży wysokiego ryzyka [Stress and depression symptoms and ways of coping in women with infertility and women with high-risk pregnancies]. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Psychologica, 22, 73–96. https://doi.org/10.18778/1427-969X.22.05
Crossref
Google Scholar
Cieślak, R. (2004). Wsparcie społeczne – sposoby definiowania, rodzaje i źródła wsparcia, wybrane koncepcje teoretyczne [Social Support – Ways of Defining, Types and Sources of Support, Selected Theoretical Concepts]. In H. Sęk & R. Cieślak (Eds.), Wsparcie społeczne, stres i zdrowie [Social Support, Stress and Health] (pp. 11‒28). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. Google Scholar
Cobb, S. (1976). Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 38(5), 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-197609000-00003
Crossref
Google Scholar
Cohen, F., Horowitz, M., Lazarus, R., Moos, R., Robins, L., Rose, R., & Rutter, M. (1982). Panel report on Psychological Stress. In G. Elliott & C. Eisdorfer (Eds.), Stress and Human Health: Analysis and Implications for Research (pp. 147–288). Springer. Google Scholar
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
Crossref
Google Scholar
Dembińska, A. (2012). Rola personelu medycznego we wsparciu kobiet poddawanych leczeniu niepłodności [The Role of Healthcare Personnel in Supporting Women Undergoing Infertility Treatment]. Medycyna Ogólna i Nauki o Zdrowiu [General Medicine and Health Sciences], 18, 366–370. Google Scholar
Dembińska, A. (2014). Psychological costs of life crisis in Polish women treated for infertility. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 32(1), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2013.852772
Crossref
Google Scholar
Dembińska, A. (2018). Psychologiczne aspekty zmagania się kobiet z niepłodnością: wahadło nadziei [Psychological Aspects of Women’s Struggle with Infertility: The Pendulum of Hope]. Difin. Google Scholar
Dembińska, A., & Malina, A. (2019). Ujawniać czy nie ujawniać – postawy wobec jawności metod wspomaganego rozrozu na gruncie poskim [To Disclose or Not to Disclose – Attitudes Towards Divulging the Method of Conception among Polish Couples]. In H. Liberska, A. Malina, & D. Suwalska-Barancewicz (Eds.), Codzienne i niecodzienne zmagania zwykłych ludzi [Ordinary and Extraordinary Struggles of Ordinary People] (pp. 218‒232). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy. Google Scholar
Dudek, B., & Koniarek, J. (2003). Wsparcie społeczne jako modyfikator procesu stresu – wybrane problemy teoretyczne i narzędzie pomiaru [Social Support as a Modifier of the Stress Process – Selected Theoretical Problems and Measurement Tool]. Medycyna Pracy [Occupational Medicine], 54(5), 427–435. Google Scholar
Eugster, A., & Vingerhoets, A. J. (1999). Psychological aspects of in vitro fertilization: a review. Social Science & Medicine, 48(5), 575–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00386-4
Crossref
Google Scholar
Galst, J. (2017). The Elusive Connection Between Stress and Infertility: A Research Review with Clinical Implications. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 28(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000081
Crossref
Google Scholar
Giesbrecht, E. (2013). Application of the Human Activity Assistive Technology model for occupational therapy research. Australian Occupational Therapy, 60(4), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12054
Crossref
Google Scholar
Haidt, J., & Kesebir, S. (2010). Morality. In S. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 797–832). Wiley. http://courses.washington.edu/ccab/Haidt%20&%20Kesebir%20on%20morality%20-%20HB%20Soc%20Psych%202010.pdf
Crossref
Google Scholar
Hashemi, S., Simbar, M., Ramezani-Tehrani, F., Shams, J., & Majd, H. A. (2012). Anxiety and success of in vitro fertilization. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 164, 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.05.032
Crossref
Google Scholar
House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Reading, Mass. Google Scholar
Jarmakowski-Kostrzanowski, T., & Jarmakowska-Kostrzanowska, L. (2016). Polska adaptacja Kwestionariusza kodów moralnych (MFQ-PL) [Polish Adaptation of the Moral Codes Questionnaire (MFQ-PL)]. Psychologia Społeczna [Social Psychology], 11(39), 489‒508. Google Scholar
Kawczyńska-Butrym, Z. (1994). Wsparcie jako element promocji zdrowia [Support as an Element of Health Promotion]. In Z. Kawczyńska-Butrym (Ed.), Wsparcie społeczne w zdrowiu i chorobie [Social Support in Sickness and in Health] (pp. 29–32). Centrum Metodyczne Doskonalenia Nauczycieli Średniego Szkolnictwa Medycznego. Google Scholar
Kmiecik-Baran, K. (1995). Skala wsparcia społecznego. Teoria i właściwości psychometryczne [Social Support Scale. Theory and Psychometric Properties]. Przegląd Psychologiczny [The Review of Psychology], 38, 201–214. Google Scholar
Knapp, P. (1992). Short-Term Immunological Effects of Induced Emotion. American Psychosomatic Society, 54, 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-199203000-00002
Crossref
Google Scholar
Koss, J., Rudnik, A., & Bidzan, M. (2014). Doświadczanie stresu a uzyskiwane wsparcie społeczne przez kobiety w ciąży wysokiego ryzyka. Doniesienia wstępne [Experiencing Stress and Obtaining Social Support by Women with High-Risk Pregnancies. Preliminary Report]. Family Forum, 4, 183–201. Google Scholar
Malina, A., Głogiewicz, M., & Piotrowski, J. (2019). Supportive Social Interactions in Infertility Treatment Decrease Cortisol Levels: Experimental Study Report. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2779. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02779
Crossref
Google Scholar
Malina, A., & Szmaus-Jackowska, A. (2021). Znaczenie i źródła wspierających interakcji społecznych w procesie leczenia niepłodności metodami wspomaganego rozrodu. Analiza jakościowa [The Significance and Source of Supportive Social Interactions in the Infertility Treatment Process Involving Assisted Reproductive Technologies. A Qualitative Analysis]. In H. Liberska, A. Malina & D. Suwalska-Barancewicz (Eds.), Społeczny i indywidualny wymiar odpowiedzialności [Social and Individual Dimension of Responsibility] (pp. 149‒158). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy. Google Scholar
Martins, M. V., Peterson, B. D., Almedia, V. M., & Costa, M. E. (2011). Direct and indirect effects of perceived social support on women’s infertility-related stress. Human Reports, 26(8), 2113–2121. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der157
Crossref
Google Scholar
McDowell, I., & Newell, C. (1987). Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
McNaughton-Cassill, M. E., Bostwick, J. M., Arthur, N. J., Robinson, R. D., & Neal, G. S. (2002). Efficacy of brief couples support groups developed to manage the stress of in vitro fertilization treatment. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 77(10), 1060–1066. https://doi.org/10.4065/77.10.1060
Crossref
Google Scholar
McNaughton-Cassill, M. E., Bostwick, M., Vanscoy, S. E., Arthur, N. J., Hickman, T. N., Robinson, R. D., & Neal, G. S. (2000). Development of brief stress management support groups for couples undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertility and Sterility, 74(1), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00564-1
Crossref
Google Scholar
Payne, R. L., & Jones, J. G. (1987). Measurement and Methodological Issues in Social Support. In S. V. Kasl & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Stress and health: Issues in research methodology (pp. 167–205). John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
Popiołek, K. (1996). Wsparcie społeczne – zarys problematyki [Social Support – An Overview]. In K. Popiołek (Ed.), Psychologia pomocy. Wybrane zagadnienia [The Psychology of Helping. Selected Issues] (pp. 30–45). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego. Google Scholar
Richman, L. (2005). Positive emotion and health: going beyond the negative. Health Psychology, 24(4), 422–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.422
Crossref
Google Scholar
Sęk, H. (1986). Wsparcie społeczne – co zrobić, aby stało się pojęciem naukowym? [Social Support – What can be done for it to become a scientific term?] Przegląd Psychologiczny [The Review of Psychology], 3, 791–800. Google Scholar
Sęk, H. (1997). Rola wsparcia społecznego w sytuacji kryzysu [The Role of Social Support in Crisis Situations]. In D. Kubacka-Jasiecka & A. Lipowska-Teutsch (Eds.), Oblicza kryzysu psychologicznego i pracy interwencyjnej [Aspects of the Psychological Crisis and Intervention Work] (pp. 143–158). Wydawnictwo ALL. Google Scholar
Slade, G. D. (1997). Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 25(4), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00941.x
Crossref
Google Scholar
Smeenk, J. M., Verhaak, C. M., Eugster, A., van Minnen, A., Zielhuis, G. A., & Braat, D. D. (2001). The effect of anxiety and depression on the outcome of in-vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction, 16(7), 1420–1423. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.7.1420
Crossref
Google Scholar
Thoits, P. A. (1983). Multiple identities and psychological well-being: A reformulation and test of the social isolation hypothesis. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095103
Crossref
Google Scholar
Waligóra, B. (1974). Funkcjonowanie człowieka w warunkach izolacji więziennej [Human Functioning in Prison Isolation Conditions]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM. Google Scholar
Weinstein, R. (2004). The Stress Effect. Avery-Penguin Group. Google Scholar
Wischmann, T. (2008). Implications of psychosocial support in infertility ‒ A critical appraisal. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 29, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/01674820701817870
Crossref
Google Scholar
Ying, L.-Y., Wu, L. H., & Loke, A. Y. (2015). The Experience of Chinese Couples Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization Treatment: Perception of the Treatment Process and Partner Support. PLOS ONE, 10(10), Article e0139691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139691
Crossref
Google Scholar
Zaig, I., Azem, F., Schreiber, S., Gottlieb-Litvin, Y., Meiboom, H., & Bloch, M. (2012). Women’s psychological profile and psychiatric diagnoses and the outcome of in vitro fertilization: is there an association? Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 15, 353–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-012-0293-z
Crossref
Google Scholar
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.