Wisdom in contemporary society. The role of psychological interventions

Krystyna Adamska

Uniwersytet Gdański
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3605-3919


Abstract

In recent years, wisdom has become a subject of interest in psychology. This concept, rooted in philosophy, has taken centre stage in numerous theories, and research findings on the consequences of wisdom reveal a number of important implications for the functioning of individuals and social groups, offering scope for professional activities focused on their well-being. The aim of the review of research on wisdom presented in this article is to present an integrated model of wisdom, which by definition (but also in the common, non-scientific understanding) manifests itself in difficult situations. This model is dynamic and contextual in nature. Research tools enabling the diagnosis of wisdom are presented. The correlates of wisdom have been subjected to theoretical analysis, including: balancing abstract and concrete thinking and the ability to balance cooperative and self-protective goals. The presentation of the contemporary psychological concept of wisdom focuses on the role of the psychologist who intervenes in various social contexts. One of the possible interventions, whose effectiveness has been demonstrated in research on wisdom, is based on training in detached self-reflection. The article also points to the possible limitations of psychological interventions and the need to raise awareness of their understanding.

 


Keywords:

mądrość, metapoznanie, przyjmowanie perspektywy, rozwiązywanie konfliktów, interwencje psychologiczne


Ardelt, M. (2003). Empirical assessment of a Three-Dimensional Wisdom Scale. Research on Aging, 25(3), 275–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027503025003004   Google Scholar

Arystoteles. (2007). Etyka nikomachejska. PWN.   Google Scholar

Baltes, P. B., Staudinger, U. M. (2000). Wisdom: A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. American Psychologist, 55(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.122   Google Scholar

Baltes, P. B., Smith, J. (2008). The fascination of wisdom: Its nature, ontogeny, and function. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00062.x   Google Scholar

Bargh, J. A., Schwader, K. L., Hailey, S. E., Dyer, R. L., Boothby, E. J. (2012). Automaticity in social-cognitive processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(12), 593–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.002   Google Scholar

Bazerman, M. H., Neal, M. A. (1997). Negocjując racjonalnie. Polskie Towarzystwo Psychologiczne.   Google Scholar

Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R. (2005). The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games and Economic Behavior, 52(2), 336–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2004.06.010   Google Scholar

Bluck, S., Glück, J. (2005). From the inside out: People’s implicit theories of wisdom. W: R. J. Sternberg, J. Jordan (red.), A Handbook of Wisdom: Psychological perspectives (s. 84–109). Cambridge University Press.   Google Scholar

Brienza, J. P., Dorfman, A., Bobocel, D. R. (2024). Mind the gap: Wise reasoning attenuates gender pay gap scepticism in men. European Journal of Social Psychology, 54(1), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.3009   Google Scholar

Brienza, J. P., Grossmann, I. (2017). Social class and wise reasoning about interpersonal conflicts across regions, persons and situations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284(1869), artykuł 20171870. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1870   Google Scholar

Brienza, J. P., Kung, F. Y. H., Chao, M. M. (2021). Wise reasoning, intergroup positivity, and attitude polarization across contexts. Nature Communication, 12(1), artykuł 3313. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23432-1   Google Scholar

Brienza, J. P., Kung, F. Y. H., Santos, H. C., Bobocel, D. R., Grossmann, I. (2018). Wisdom, bias, and balance: Toward a process-sensitive measurement of wisdom-related cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(6), 1093–1126. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000171   Google Scholar

Center for Practical Wisdom. (2020, 10 sierpnia). Toronto Wisdom Task Force publishes common model of wisdom to guide future research. https://wisdomcenter.uchicago.edu/news/wisdom-news/toronto-wisdom-task-force-publishes-common-model-wisdom-guide-future-research   Google Scholar

Clore, G. L., Huntsinger, J. R. (2007). How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(9), 393–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.005   Google Scholar

Conway, M., Vartanian, L. R. (2000). A status account of gender stereotypes: Beyond communality and agency. Sex Roles, 43, 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007076813819   Google Scholar

Cowles, H. M., Knobe, J. (2023). The average isn’t normal: The history and cognitive science of an everyday scientific practice. W: U. Kriegel (red.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Mind (wyd. 3, s. 29–56). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198879466.003.0002   Google Scholar

Dorfman, A., Moscovitch, D. A., Chopik, W. J., Grossmann, I. (2022). None the wiser: Year-long longitudinal study on effects of adversity on wisdom. European Journal of Personality, 36(4), 559–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070211014057   Google Scholar

Fiske, S. T., Taylor, S. E. (2020). Social cognition evolves: Illustrations from our work on intergroup bias and on healthy adaptation. Psicothema, 32(3), 291–297. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2020.197   Google Scholar

Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of freedom. Rowman & Littlefield.   Google Scholar

Gawronski, B. (2026). Implicit bias: what is it and how does it matter for diversity, equity, and inclusion?. W: V. Esses, J. Dovidio, J. Jetten, D. Sekaquaptewa, K. West (red.), The Sage handbook of psychological perspectives on diversity, equity, and inclusion (s. 50-64). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036237455.n6   Google Scholar

Glück, J., Bluck, S., Weststrate, N. M. (2019). More on the MORE life experience model: What we have learned (so far). The Journal of Value Inquiry, 53(3), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-018-9661-x   Google Scholar

Glück, J., Brienza, J. P. (2025). Wisdom in action: A call to bridge fields in psychology (and beyond) to solve complex world problems. American Psychologist. Publikacja online przed drukiem. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001593   Google Scholar

Glück, J., König, S., Naschenweng, K., Redzanowski, U., Dorner, L., Strasser, I. (2015). State wisdom vs. Trait wisdom: Do situations influence wisdom more than individuals do? The Gerontologist, 55 (suplement 2), 592. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv304.01   Google Scholar

Glück, J., Weststrate, N. M. (2022). The wisdom researchers and the elephant: An integrative model of wise behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 26(4), 342–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221094650   Google Scholar

Grossmann, I. (2017). Wisdom and how to cultivate it. European Psychologist, 22(4), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000302   Google Scholar

Grossmann, I., Brienza J. (2018). The strengths of wisdom provide unique contributions to improved leadership, sustainability, inequality, gross national happiness, and civic discourse in the face of contemporary world problems. Journal of Intelligence, 6(2), artykuł 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6020022   Google Scholar

Grossmann, I., Dorfman, A., Oakes, H., Santos, H. C., Vohs, K. D., Scholer, A. A. (2021). Training for wisdom: The distanced-self-reflection diary method. Psychological Science, 32(3), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620969170   Google Scholar

Grossmann, I., Johnson, S. G. B. (2025). Cultivating wisdom through metacognition: A new frontier in decision-making under radical uncertainty. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 14(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000235   Google Scholar

Grossmann, I., Kross, E. (2014). Exploring “Solomon’s paradox”: Self-distancing eliminates the self-other asymmetry in wise reasoning about close relations in younger and older adults. Psychological Science, 25(8), 1571–1580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614535400   Google Scholar

Grossmann, I., Na, J., Varnum, M. E. W., Kitayama, S., Nisbett, R. E. (2013). A route to well-being: Intelligence versus wise reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(3), 944–953. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029560   Google Scholar

Grossmann, I., Smith, J. A., Wegenschimmel, N., Diepa, P., Dorfman, A. (2025). Wisdom in time: Advancing dynamic models of wisdom, intellectual humility, open-mindedness, and perspective-taking. European Review of Social Psychology, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2025.2500897   Google Scholar

Grossmann, I., Weststrate, N. M., Ardelt, M., Brienza, J. P., Dong, M., Ferrari, M., Fournier, M. A., Hu, C. S., Nusbaum, H. C., Vervaeke, J. (2020). The science of wisdom in a polarized world: Knowns and unknowns. Psychological Inquiry, 31(2), 103–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1750917   Google Scholar

Henrich, J. (2016). The secret of our success. Princeton University Press.   Google Scholar

Huynh, A. C., Grossmann, I. (2020). A pathway for wisdom-focused education. Journal of Moral Education, 49(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2018.1496903   Google Scholar

Huynh, A. C., Oakes, H., Shay, G. R., McGregor, I. (2017). The wisdom in virtue: Pursuit of virtue predicts wise reasoning about personal conflicts. Psychological Science, 28(12), 1848–1856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617722621   Google Scholar

Huynh, A. C., Yang, D. Y.-J. Grossmann, I. (2016). The value of prospective reasoning for close relationships. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(8), 893–902. https:/doi.org /10.1177/1948550616660591   Google Scholar

James, W. (2012). The principles of psychology. Dover Publications. (Oryginał opublikowano 1890).   Google Scholar

Jeste, D. V., Lee, E. E. (2019). The emerging empirical science of wisdom: Definition, measurement, neurobiology, longevity, and interventions. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 27(3), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1097/hrp.0000000000000205   Google Scholar

Kotarbiński, T. (1967). Medytacje o życiu godziwym. Wydawnictwo Wiedza Powszechna.   Google Scholar

Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M. L., Keltner, D. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119(3), 546–572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028756   Google Scholar

Moshman, D. (2011). Adolescent rationality and development: Cognition, morality, and identity (wyd. 3). Psychology Press.   Google Scholar

Namvar, M., Intezari, A., Akhlaghpour, S., Brienza, J. P. (2023). Beyond effective use: Integrating wise reasoning in machine learning development. International Journal of Information Management, 69, artykuł 102566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102566   Google Scholar

Perry, C. L., Komro, K. A., Jones, R. M., Munson, K., Williams, C. L., Jason, L. (2002). The measurement of wisdom and its relationship to adolescent substance use and problem behaviors. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 12(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1300/J029v12n01_03   Google Scholar

Pietrasiński, Z. (2001). Mądrość, czyli świetne wyposażenie umysłu. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.   Google Scholar

Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., Côté, S., Cheng, B. H., Keltner, D. (2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 771–784. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020092   Google Scholar

Piff, P. K., Moskowitz, J. P. (2018). Wealth, poverty, and happiness: Social class is differentially associated with positive emotions. Emotion, 18(6), 902–905. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0000387   Google Scholar

Piff, P. K., Stancato, D. M., Martinez, A. G., Kraus, M. W., Keltner, D. (2012). Class, chaos, and the construction of community. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(6), 949–962. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029673   Google Scholar

Porter, T., Baldwin, C. R., Warren, M. T., Murray, E. D., Cotton Bronk, K., Forgeard, M. J. C., Snow, N. E., Jayawickreme, E. (2021). Clarifying the content of intellectual humility: A systematic review and integrative framework. Journal of Personality Assessment, 104(5), 573–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2021.1975725   Google Scholar

Porter, T., Cimpian, A. (2023). A context’s emphasis on intellectual ability discourages the expression of intellectual humility. Motivation Science, 9(2), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000289   Google Scholar

Puryear, C., Gray, K. (2024). Using “Balanced Pragmatism” in political discussions increases cross-partisan respect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 153(5), 1189–1212. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001554   Google Scholar

Schwarz, N. (2012). Feelings-as-Information Theory. W: P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, E. T. Higgins (red.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (s. 289–308). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n15   Google Scholar

Shensa, A., Sidani, J. E., Dew, M. A., Escobar-Viera, C. G., Primack, B. A. (2018). Social media use and depression and anxiety symptoms: A cluster analysis. American Journal of Health Behavior, 42(2), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.42.2.11   Google Scholar

Smith, J. A., Dorfman, A., Wegenschimmel, N., Grossmann, I. (2025). Wisdom reconsidered: A dynamic network account of metacognition and complex thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 154(11), 3114–3128. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001821   Google Scholar

Stephens, N. M., Markus, H. R., Phillips, L. T. (2014). Social class culture cycles: how three gateway contexts shape selves and fuel inequality. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 611–634. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115143   Google Scholar

Stephens, N. M., Markus, H. R., Townsend, S. S. M. (2007). Choice as an act of meaning: The case of social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 814–830. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.814   Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Why school should teach for wisdom: The balance theory of wisdom in educational settings. Educational Psychologist, 36(4), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3604_2   Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., Reznitskaya, A., Jarvin, L. (2007). “Teaching for wisdom: What matters is not just what students know, but how they use it”. London Review of Education, 5(2), 143–158.   Google Scholar

Trope, Y., Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963   Google Scholar

Trope, Y., Liberman, N. (2012). Construal level theory. W: P. A. M. Van Lange, A.W.Kruglanski, E. T. Higgins (red.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (tom 1, s. 118–134). SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n7   Google Scholar

Webster, J. D. (2007). Measuring the character strength of wisdom. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 65(2), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.2190/AG.65.2.d   Google Scholar

Webster, J. D. (2019). Self-report wisdom measures: Strengths, limitations, and future directions. W: R. J. Sternberg, J. Glück (red.), The Cambridge handbook of wisdom (s. 297–320). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108568272.015   Google Scholar

Weststrate, N. M., Bluck, S., Glück, J. (2019). Wisdom of the crowd: Exploring people’s conceptions of wisdom. W: R. J. Sternberg, J. Glück (red.), The Cambridge handbook of wisdom (s. 97–121). Cambridge University Press.   Google Scholar

Weststrate, N. M., Ferrari, M., Fournier, M. A., McLean, K. C. (2018). “It was the best worst day of my life”: Narrative content, structure, and process in wisdom-fostering life event memories. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 73(8), 1359–1373. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby005   Google Scholar

Yang, Z. (R.), Kung, F. Y. H., Brienza, J. P., Chao, M. M. (2024). Bridging social divides: The role of wise reasoning in improving intergroup relations. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 10(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000389   Google Scholar


Published
2026-09-30

Cited by

Adamska, K. (2026). Wisdom in contemporary society. The role of psychological interventions. The Review of Psychology, 69(3), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.31648/przegldpsychologiczny.12073

Krystyna Adamska 
Uniwersytet Gdański
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3605-3919