Polish adaptation of the Actively Open-Minded Thinking (AOT) questionnaire: Pomiar otwartego i elastycznego myślenia (POEM)

Anna Błaszczak

Institute of Psychology, Maria-Curie Skłodowska University in Lublin
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0597-5117

Marta Klocek

Institute of Psychology, Maria-Curie Skłodowska University in Lublin
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4406-6844


Abstract

Aims

The aim of this research was to develop a Polish adaptation of the Actively Open-Minded Thinking (AOT) questionnaire. This questionnaire allows to assess the disposition to flexibly consider different problems from various perspectives, regardless of one’s initially favoured options, as well as the critical attitude in analysing information and forming opinions.

Methods

The research was conducted among two groups of adult participants. Validity of the AOT scale was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis, and correlation coefficient analyses between the scale’s results and the measures of need for cognition, need for closure or cognitive reflection. Internal consistency of the Polish adaptation of the AOT scale was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha measure.

Results

Polish adaptation of the AOT questionnaire (Pomiar otwartego i elastycznego myślenia; POEM) satisfied the established reliability and validity criteria. Based on the conducted analyses, the instrument was significantly shortened relative to the original version of the AOT scale, with a similar approach seen in past research exploring the optimal item set with highest attainable psychometric properties. Internal consistency indices were sufficiently high and, in line with the researchers’ predictions, the instrument correlated with other measures of corresponding cognitive constructs.

Conclusions

AOT is a dynamic variable, dependent upon the influence of training or experience. Polish adaptation of the scale measuring the phenomenon is an instrument with promising psychometric properties, worth further investigation. The POEM scale can be valuable in assessing open-minded thinking in educational settings, in research investigating the conditions facilitating social categorisation or radicalisation.


Keywords:

actively open-minded thinking, flexible thinking, AOT, Polish adaptation


Baron, J. (1993). Why Teach Thinking? ‒ An Essay. Target article with commentary. Applied Psychology, 42(3), 191‒214.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Baron, J. (2008). Thinking and deciding (4th ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.   Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Morris, K. J. (1983). Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 805–818.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42. DOI: 10.1257/08953300577519673.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Haran, U., Ritov, I., & Mellers, B. A. (2013). The Role of Actively Open-Minded Thinking in Information Acquisition, Accuracy, and Calibration. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(3), 188‒201.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Janssen, E. M., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Heijltjes, A. E. G., Mainhard, T., van Peppen, L. M., & van Gog, T. (2020). Psychometric Properties of the Actively Open-Minded Thinking Scale. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 100659.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Jarymowicz, M. (red.) (2002). Poza egocentryczną perspektywą widzenia siebie i świata [Beyond the egocentric perspective of seeing yourself and the world]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Psychologii PAN.   Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80(4), 237–251. DOI: 10.1037/h0034747.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Kokis, J. V., Macpherson, R., Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2002). Heuristic and analytic processing: Age trends and associations with cognitive ability and cognitive styles. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83, 26‒52. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-0965(02)00121-2.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Kossowska, M. (2003). Różnice indywidualne w potrzebie poznawczego domknięcia [Individual differences in the need for cognitive closure]. Przegląd Psychologiczny [The Review of Psychology], 46(4), 355–374.   Google Scholar

Kossowska, M. (2009). Nowe poznawcze wymiary osobowości a społeczne poznanie i działanie [New cognitive dimensions of personality versus social cognition and Action]. In M. Kofta & M. Kossowska (Eds.), Psychologia poznania społecznego: Nowe tendencje [The psychology of social cognition: New trends] (pp. 225–244). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.   Google Scholar

Kossowska, M., Hanusz, K., & Trejtowicz, M. (2012). Różnice indywidualne w potrzebie poznawczego domknięcia [Individual differences in the need for cognitive closure]. Psychologia Społeczna [Social Psychology], 7(1), 89–99.   Google Scholar

Lubiewska, K., & Głogowska, K. (2018). Zastosowanie analizy równoważności pomiarowej w badaniach psychologicznych [Application of measurement equivalence analysis in psychological research]. Polskie Forum Psychologiczne [Polish Psychological Forum], 23, 330‒356.   Google Scholar

Matusz, P. J., Traczyk, J., & Gąsiorowska, A. (2011). Kwestionariusz Potrzeby Poznania – konstrukcja i weryfikacja empiryczna narzędzia mierzącego motywację poznawczą [Need for Cognition Questionnaire – construction and empirical validation of a tool measuring cognitive motivation]. Psychologia Społeczna [Social Psychology], 2(17), 113–128.   Google Scholar

Metz, S. E., Baelen, R. N., & Yu, A. (2020). Actively open‐minded thinking in American adolescents. Review of Education, 8(3), 768‒799.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Paulhus, D. L., & Reid, D. B. (1991). Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 307‒317.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Rachev, N. R., Geiger, S. J., Vintr, J., Kirilova, D., Nabutovsky, A., & Nelsson, J. (2022). Actively open-minded thinking, bullshit receptivity, and susceptibility to framing: Evaluating the dual-process account in North America and Bulgaria. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 38(6), 440–451. DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000685.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (Eds.). (1991). Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. Academic Press.   Google Scholar

Sá, W. C., Kelley, C. N., Ho, C., & Stanovich, K. E. (2005). Thinking about personal theories: Individual differences in the coordination of theory and evidence. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1149–1161. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2004.07.012.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Sá, W. C., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (1999). The domain specificity and generality of belief bias: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 497–510. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.497.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1997). Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 342‒357.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2007). Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability. Thinking & Reasoning, 13(3), 225‒247.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Svedholm-Häkkinen, A.M., & Lindeman, M. (2017). Actively open-minded thinking: Development of a shortened scale and disentangling attitudes towards knowledge and people. Thinking & Reasoning, 24, 21‒40. DOI: 10.1080/13546783.2017.1378723.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Szydłowski, P. (2015). Pomiar stylu analitycznego przetwarzania informacji. Wstępna weryfikacja narzędzi: Testu Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) i zadań Base-Rate Tasks (BRT) [Measuring analytical style of information processing. Pre-verification of tools: Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) and Base-Rate Tasks (BRT)]. Studia Psychologica, 15(2), 57–70.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Szydłowski, P. (2019). Style poznawcze a religijność [Cognitive styles and religiosity]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Liberi Libri.   Google Scholar

Troldahl, V., & Powell, F. (1965). A short-form dogmatism scale for use in field studies. Social Forces, 44, 211‒215.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049‒1062.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Download


Published
2022-12-31

Cited by

Błaszczak, A., & Klocek, M. (2022). Polish adaptation of the Actively Open-Minded Thinking (AOT) questionnaire: Pomiar otwartego i elastycznego myślenia (POEM). The Review of Psychology, 65(4), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.31648/przegldpsychologiczny.9104

Anna Błaszczak 
Institute of Psychology, Maria-Curie Skłodowska University in Lublin
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0597-5117
Marta Klocek 
Institute of Psychology, Maria-Curie Skłodowska University in Lublin
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4406-6844