Schizoid Personality and the Dimensional Conceptualization of Personality Disorders According to ICD-11

Sandra Nowak

Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Faculty of Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3907-7115

Emilia Soroko

Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Department of Health Psychology and Clinical Psychology
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3527-1698


Abstract

Aim: Contemporary scientific research and clinical practice are increasingly incorporating dimensional models of personality disorders. This trend requires precise clarification of the relationship between traditional ways of conceptualizing disorders and new proposals based on dimensions. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between schizoid personality traits and ICD-11 diagnostic components, and to determine to what extent schizoid personality as a dimensional construct can be predicted (diagnosed) based on ICD-11 conceptualization components, such as severity of personality disorder and pathological traits.

Method: The study group consisted of 176 individuals aged 18–71 years (M = 28.3, SD = 10.3, 83.5% female). Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD) was used to determine the level of pathological personality traits, and Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale (SIFS) was used to assess the level of severity of personality disorders. The Character Styles Questionnaire was used to determine the level of schizoid personality disorder.

Results: The results of correlation analysis show significant relationships between schizoid personality disorder (as a dimensional construct) and scales measuring the level of severity of personality disorder (identity, self-direction, empathy, intimacy) and the level of pathological traits (except for anankastia). The results of the stepwise regression analysis show that the first stage of personality disorder assessment according to the ICD-11 model, i.e. diagnosing the level of severity of personality disorders, explains 41% of schizoid personality, and the inclusion of pathological traits (the detachment trait turned out to be important here) raises this percentage to 54.

Conclusion: The results suggest a convergence between the new dimensional conceptualizations of personality disorders and previous categorical approaches and the need for future research.


Keywords:

dimensional model, schizoid personality disorder, ICD-11, personality disorders, The Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale, Personality Inventory for ICD-11


Akhtar, S. (1987). Schizoid personality disorder: A synthesis of developmental, dynamic, and descriptive features. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 41(4), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1987.41.4.499
Crossref   Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV (4th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.   Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5 (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Bach, B., & Anderson, J. L. (2020). Patient-Reported ICD-11 Personality Disorder Severity and DSM-5 Level of Personality Functioning. Journal of Personality Disorders, 34(2), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2018_32_393
Crossref   Google Scholar

Bach, B., Brown, T. A., Mulder, R. T., Newton-Howes, G., Simonsen, E., & Sellbom, M. (2021). Development and initial evaluation of the ICD-11 personality disorder severity scale: PDS-ICD-11. Personality and Mental Health, 15(3), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1510.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Bach, B., & First, M. B. (2018). Application of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders. BMC Psychiatry, 18(1), article 351. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1908-3
Crossref   Google Scholar

Bach, B., Kerber, A., Aluja, A., Bastiaens, T., Keeley, J. W., Claes, L., Fossati, A., Gutierrez, F., Oliveira, S. E. S., Pires, R., Riegel, K. D., Rolland, J.-P., Roskam, I., Sellbom, M., Somma, A., Spanemberg, L., Strus, W., Thimm, J. C., Wright, A. G. C., & Zimmermann, J. (2020). International Assessment of DSM-5 and ICD-11 Personality Disorder Traits: Toward a Common Nosology in DSM-5.1. Psychopathology, 53(3–4), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1159/000507589
Crossref   Google Scholar

Bach, B., Kramer, U., Doering, S., di Giacomo, E., Hutsebaut, J., Kaera, A., De Panfilis, C., Schmahl, C., Swales, M., Taubner, S., & Renneberg, B. (2022). The ICD-11 classification of personality disorders: A European perspective on challenges and opportunities. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, 9(1), article 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40479-022-00182-0
Crossref   Google Scholar

Bach, B., Sellbom, M., Kongerslev, M., Simonsen, E., Krueger, R. F., & Mulder, R. (2017). Deriving ICD-11 personality disorder domains from dsm-5 traits: Initial attempt to harmonize two diagnostic systems. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 136(1), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12748
Crossref   Google Scholar

Bach, B., & Simonsen, S. (2021). How does level of personality functioning inform clinical management and treatment? Implications for ICD-11 classification of personality disorder severity. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 34(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000658
Crossref   Google Scholar

Bastiaens, T., Bogaerts, A., Luyckx, K., Smits, D., & Claes, L. (2022). A person-centered perspective on the combined DSM-5 AMPD/ICD-11 personality model: Utility, relationship with the categorical personality disorder model, and capacity to differentiate between levels of identity functioning. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, article 1006842. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1006842
Crossref   Google Scholar

Beck, A. T., Freeman, A., & Davis, D. D. (2004). Cognitive therapy of personality disorders. Guilford.   Google Scholar

Bogaerts, A., Luyckx, K., Bastiaens, T., Kaufman, E. A., & Claes, L. (2021). Identity Impairment as a Central Dimension in Personality Pathology. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 43(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-020-09804-9
Crossref   Google Scholar

Booules-Katri, T.-M., Pedreño, C., Navarro, J.-B., Pamias, M., & Obiols, J. E. (2019). Theory of Mind (ToM) Performance in High Functioning Autism (HFA) and Schizotypal–Schizoid Personality Disorders (SSPD) Patients. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(8), 3376–3386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04058-1
Crossref   Google Scholar

Bornstein, R. F., & Natoli, A. P. (2019). Clinical utility of categorical and dimensional perspectives on personality pathology: A meta-analytic review. Personality Disorders, 10(6), 479–490. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000365
Crossref   Google Scholar

Carvalho, L. de F., Salvador, A. P., & Gonçalves, A. P. (2020). Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory—Schizoid Personality Disorder Scale. Avaliação Psicológica, 19(3), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2020.1903.16758.07
Crossref   Google Scholar

Cheli, S., Chiarello, F., & Cavalletti, V. (2023). A Psychotherapy Oriented by Compassion and Metacognition for Schizoid Personality Disorder: A Two Cases Series. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 53(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-022-09566-3
Crossref   Google Scholar

Cieciuch, J., Łakuta, P., Strus, W., Oltmanns, J. R., Widiger, T. (2022). Assessment of personality disorder in the ICD-11 diagnostic system: Polish validation of the Personality Inventory for ICD-11. Psychiatria Polska, 56(6), 1185–1202. https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/138563
Crossref   Google Scholar

Cierpiałkowska, L. Pasikowski, T. (2004). Kwestionariusz stylów charakteru. Wersja poprawiona [Character Styles Questionnaire-Revised (CSQ-R)] [unpublished materials]. Adam Mickiewicz University, Institute of Psychology.   Google Scholar

Clarkin, J., Fonagy, P., & Gabbard, G. (2013). Psychoterapia psychodynamiczna zaburzeń osobowości. Podręcznik kliniczny [Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Personality Disorders. A Clinical Handbook] (1st ed.). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.   Google Scholar

Cook, M. L., Zhang, Y., & Constantino, J. N. (2020). On the Continuity Between Autistic and Schizoid Personality Disorder Trait Burden: A Prospective Study in Adolescence. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 208(2), 94‒100. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000001105
Crossref   Google Scholar

Coolidge, F. L., Estey, A. J., Segal, D. L., & Marle, P. D. (2013). Are alexithymia and schizoid personality disorder synonymous diagnoses? Comprehensive Psychiatry, 54(2), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.07.005
Crossref   Google Scholar

Edwards, E., Leahy, R., & Snyder, S. (2022). Patterns of emotional schema endorsement and personality disorder symptoms among outpatient psychotherapy clients. Motivation and Emotion, 47(2), 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-022-10000-3
Crossref   Google Scholar

Gamache, D., Savard, C., Leclerc, P., & Côté, A. (2019). Introducing a short self-report for the assessment of DSM–5 level of personality functioning for personality disorders: The Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 10(5), 438–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000335
Crossref   Google Scholar

Gamache, D., Savard, C., Leclerc, P., Payant, M., Berthelot, N., Côté, A., Faucher, J., Lampron, M., Lemieux, R., Mayrand, K., Nolin, M.-C., & Tremblay, M. (2021). A Proposed Classification of ICD-11 Severity Degrees of Personality Pathology Using the Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, article 628057. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.628057
Crossref   Google Scholar

Glover, N. G., Crego, C., & Widiger, T. A. (2012). The clinical utility of the Five Factor Model of personality disorder. Personality Disorders, 3(2), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024030
Crossref   Google Scholar

Gore, W. L., & Pincus, A. L. (2013). Dependency and the five-factor model. In Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (3rd ed., pp. 163–177). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13939-011
Crossref   Google Scholar

Hopwood, C. J., Kotov, R., Krueger, R. F., Watson, D., Widiger, T. A., Althoff, R. R., Ansell, E. B., Bach, B., Bagby, R. M., Blais, M. A., Bornovalova, M. A., Chmielewski, M., Cicero, D. C., Conway, C., De Clercq, B., De Fruyt, F., Docherty, A. R., Eaton, N. R., Edens, J. F., … Zimmermann, J. (2018). The time has come for dimensional personality disorder diagnosis. Personality and Mental Health, 12(1), 82–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1408
Crossref   Google Scholar

Hopwood, C. J., Malone, J. C., Ansell, E. B., Sanislow, C. A., Grilo, C. M., McGlashan, T. H., Pinto, A., Markowitz, J. C., Shea, M. T., Skodol, A. E., Gunderson, J. G., Zanarini, M. C., & Morey, L. C. (2011). Personality assessment in DSM-5: Empirical support for rating severity, style, and traits. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25(3), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2011.25.3.305
Crossref   Google Scholar

Hopwood, C. J., Morey, L. C., & Markon, K. E. (2023). What is a psychopathology dimension? Clinical Psychology Review, 106, 1‒10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102356
Crossref   Google Scholar

Kernberg, O. F. (2016). What is Personality? Journal of Personality Disorders, 30(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2106.30.2.145
Crossref   Google Scholar

Kotov, R., Krueger, R. F., Watson, D., Cicero, D. C., Conway, C. C., DeYoung, C. G., Eaton, N. R., Forbes, M. K., Hallquist, M. N., Latzman, R. D., Mullins-Sweatt, S. N., Ruggero, C. J., Simms, L. J., Waldman, I. D., Waszczuk, M. A., & Wright, A. G. C. (2021). The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Quantitative Nosology Based on Consensus of Evidence. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 17(1), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-093304
Crossref   Google Scholar

McCabe, G. A., & Widiger, T. A. (2020). A comprehensive comparison of the ICD-11 and DSM–5 section III personality disorder models. Psychological Assessment, 32(1), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000772
Crossref   Google Scholar

Meyer, B., Pilkonis, P. A., & Beevers, C. G. (2004). What’s in a (neutral) face? Personality disorders, attachment styles, and the appraisal of ambiguous social cues. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18(4), 320–336. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2004.18.4.320
Crossref   Google Scholar

Morey, L. C., Good, E. W., & Hopwood, C. J. (2022). Global personality dysfunction and the relationship of pathological and normal trait domains in the DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders. Journal of Personality, 90(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12560
Crossref   Google Scholar

Morey, L. C., & Hopwood, C. J. (2020). Brief Report: Expert Preferences for Categorical, Dimensional, and Mixed/Hybrid Approaches to Personality Disorder Diagnosis. Journal of Personality Disorders, 34(Supplement C), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2019_33_398
Crossref   Google Scholar

Mulder, R. T. (2021). ICD-11 Personality Disorders: Utility and Implications of the New Model. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, article 655548. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.655548
Crossref   Google Scholar

Oltmanns, J. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2018). A self-report measure for the ICD-11 dimensional trait model proposal: The personality inventory for ICD-11. Psychological Assessment, 30(2), 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000459
Crossref   Google Scholar

Paap, M. C. S., Heltne, A., Pedersen, G., Germans Selvik, S., Frans, N., Wilberg, T., & Hummelen, B. (2022). More is more: Evidence for the incremental value of the SCID-II/SCID-5-PD specific factors over and above a general personality disorder factor. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 13(2), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000426
Crossref   Google Scholar

Sansone, R. A., & Sansone, L. A. (2011). Personality disorders: A nation-based perspective on prevalence. Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience, 8(4), 13–18.   Google Scholar

Siczek, A., & Cieciuch, J. (2023). Patologiczne cechy osobowości z ICD-11 a przywiązanie – porównanie 10 modeli wymiarów przywiązania [Pathological personality traits from ICD-11 and attachment–Comparison of 10 models of attachment dimensions]. Psychiatria Polska [Polish Psychiatry], 319, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/165975 , https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-254077
Crossref   Google Scholar

Sharp, C., & Wall, K. (2021). DSM-5 Level of Personality Functioning: Refocusing Personality Disorder on What It Means to Be Human. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 17, 313–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-105402
Crossref   Google Scholar

Shedler, J., & Westen, D. (2004). Refining personality disorder diagnosis: Integrating science and practice. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 161(8), 1350–1365. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.161.8.1350
Crossref   Google Scholar

Sleep, C. E., Lynam, D. R., Widiger, T. A., Crowe, M. L., & Miller, J. D. (2019). An evaluation of DSM–5 Section III personality disorder Criterion A (impairment) in accounting for psychopathology. Psychological Assessment, 31(10), 1181–1191. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000620
Crossref   Google Scholar

Sleep, C., Lynam, D. R., & Miller, J. D. (2021). Personality impairment in the DSM-5 and ICD-11: Current standing and limitations. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 34(1), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000657
Crossref   Google Scholar

Sleep, C. E., & Lynam, D. R. (2022). The problems with Criterion A: A comment on Morey et al. (2022). Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 13(4), 325–327. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000585
Crossref   Google Scholar

Smith, A. (2006). Cognitive Empathy and Emotional Empathy in Human Behavior and Evolution. The Psychological Record, 56(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395534.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Soroko, E., Cieciuch, J., & Gamache, D. (in press). Validation of the Polish Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale (SIFS-PL) in Community and Clinical Samples. Current Issues of Personality Psychology.   Google Scholar

Thylstrup, B., & Hesse, M. (2009). “I am not Complaining”—Ambivalence Construct in Schizoid Personality Disorder. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 63(2), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2009.63.2.147
Crossref   Google Scholar

Tracy, M., Tiliopoulos, N., Sharpe, L., & Bach, B. (2021). The clinical utility of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders and related traits: A preliminary scoping review. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 55(9), 849–862. https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674211025607
Crossref   Google Scholar

Triebwasser, J., Chemerinski, E., Roussos, P., & Siever, L. J. (2012). Schizoid personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6(26), 919–926.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Trull, T., & Widiger, T. (2022). Dimensional models of personality: The five-factor model and the DSM-5. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 2(15), 135–146.
Crossref   Google Scholar

West, M., Rose, M. S., & Sheldon-Keller, A. (1994). Assessment of Patterns of Insecure Attachment in Adults and Application to Dependent and Schizoid Personality Disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 8(3), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1994.8.3.249
Crossref   Google Scholar

Widiger, T. A., Bach, B., Chmielewski, M., Clark, L. A., DeYoung, C., Hopwood, C. J., Kotov, R., Krueger, R. F., Miller, J. D., Morey, L. C., Mullins-Sweatt, S. N., Patrick, C. J., Pincus, A. L., Samuel, D. B., Sellbom, M., South, S. C., Tackett, J. L., Watson, D., Waugh, M. H., … Thomas, K. M. (2019). Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101(4), 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1465431
Crossref   Google Scholar

Widiger, T. A., Trull, T. J., Clarkin, J. F., Sanderson, C., & Costa Jr., P. T. (2002). A description of the DSM-IV personality disorders with the five-factor model of personality. In Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (2nd ed., pp. 89–99). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10423-006.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Winarick, D. J. (2020). Schizoid Personality Disorder. In The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 181–185). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119547181.ch294
Crossref   Google Scholar

Winarick, D. J., & Bornstein, R. F. (2015). Toward resolution of a longstanding controversy in personality disorder diagnosis: Contrasting correlates of schizoid and avoidant traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 79, 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.026.
Crossref   Google Scholar

World Health Organization (WHO). (2022). ICD-11: International classification of diseases (11th revision). https://icd.who.int/   Google Scholar

Zimmermann, R., Steppan, M., Zimmermann, J., Oeltjen, L., Birkhölzer, M., Schmeck, K., & Goth, K. (2022). A DSM-5 AMPD and ICD-11 compatible measure for an early identification of personality disorders in adolescence-LoPF-Q 12-18 latent structure and short form. PLOS ONE, 17(9), e0269327. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269327
Crossref   Google Scholar

Download


Published
2024-09-13

Cited by

Nowak, S., & Soroko, E. (2024). Schizoid Personality and the Dimensional Conceptualization of Personality Disorders According to ICD-11. The Review of Psychology, 67(2), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.31648/przegldpsychologiczny.9771

Sandra Nowak 
Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Faculty of Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3907-7115
Emilia Soroko 
Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Department of Health Psychology and Clinical Psychology
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3527-1698