Znaczenie odstraszania strategicznego dla bezpieczeństwa międzynarodowego: Importance of strategic deterrence for international security

Mirosław Banasik

doi:10.31648/pw.6467

Znaczenie odstraszania strategicznego dla bezpieczeństwa międzynarodowego

Importance of strategic deterrence for international security

Mirosław Banasik

Uniwersytet Jana Kochanowskiego w Kielcach

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31648/pw.6467

Abstrakt

The aim of the article was to clarify the essence of the strategic deterrence and to characterize the deterrent mechanisms used to shape international security. The article explains the nature of the deterrent and mechanisms to guarantee international security. It presents the genesis of deterrence and characterizes its evolution. It also indicates the need for changes in the theory and practice of deterrence. As a result of the studies, it has been established that, nowadays, thanks to the complementary use of hard and soft power, strategic deterrence has a multi-faceted character and its importance for international relations is increasing. It is closely linked to diplomacy and constitutes a mechanism, by means of which the foreign political interests of states are realized and the international security order is shaped.

Słowa kluczowe:

Deterrence, international security, strategy, conflict, punishment, threat

Bibliografia

BEAUFRE, A. (1965), Deterrence and Strategy. New York. Google Scholar

CORNISH, P. (2017), Integrated Deterrence: NATO’s ‘First Reset’ Strategy. In: https://www.globsec.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/GNAI-Integratted-Deterrrence.pdf> [dostęp 29.12.2018]. Google Scholar

DANILOVIC, V. (2017), When the Stakes Are High. Deterrence and Conflict among Major Powers, University of Michigan. In: https://www.press.umich.edu/pdf/0472112872-ch3.pdf [dostęp 25.12.2018]. Google Scholar

EASSEY, J. M./BOMAN, J. H. (2015), Deterrence Theory. In: https://marisluste.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/deterrence-theory.pdf [dostęp 05.01.2019]. Google Scholar

HOFFMAN, F. (2016), The Contemporary Spectrum of Conflict: Protracted, Gray Zone, Ambiguous, and Hybrid Modes of War. In: https:// s3.amazonaws.com/ims-2016/PDF/2016_Index_of_US_ Military_ Strength_ESSAY S_HOF FMAN.pdf [dostęp 16.02.2016]. Google Scholar

HUTH, P./RUSSETT, B. (1988), Deterrence Failure and Crisis Escalation. In: International Studies Quarterly. 32 (1). In: https://academic.oup.com/isq/article-abstract/32/1/29/1813705?redirectedFrom=fulltext [dostęp 28.12.2018]. Google Scholar

HUTH, P. K. (1988), Extended Deterrence and the Prevention of War. New Haven. Google Scholar

Internetowy słownik (2018), Internetowy słownik języka angielskiego. In: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/deter [dostęp 25.12.2018]. Google Scholar

Internetowy słownik (2019), Internetowy słownik języka polskiego. W: https://sjp.pwn.pl/slowniki/odstraszanie.html [dostęp 16.01.2019]. Google Scholar

JERVIS, R. (1979), Deterrence Theory Revisite. In: World Politics. 31 (2) URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259380734_Deterrence_Theory_Revisited [dostęp 29.12.2018]. Google Scholar

KAPUSTA, P. (2015), The Gray Zone. In: Special Warfare. 28 (4). URL: http://www.soc.mil/swcs/SWmag/archive/SW2804/October%202015%20Special%20Warfare.pdf [do-stęp 16.02.2016]. Google Scholar

KNOPF, J. (2008), Three Items in One: Deterrence as Concept, Research Program and Political Issue. In: https://calhoun.nps.edu/bitstream/handle/10945/58532/isa08_proceeding_251419.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [dostęp 29.12.2018]. Google Scholar

KNOPF, J. W. (2010), The Fourth Wave in Deterrence Research. In: Contemporary Security Policy. 31(1). URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13523261003640819?needAccess=true [dostęp 29.12.2018]. Google Scholar

KÜHN, U. (2018), Preventing Escalation in the Baltics, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Washing-ton. Google Scholar

MAZARR, M. J. (2018), Understanding Deterrence. Santa Monika. Google Scholar

MAZARR, M. J./ARTHUR, C. (2018), What Deters and Why. Exploring Requirements for Effective Deterrence of Interstate Aggression. Santa Monica. Google Scholar

MORGAN, P. M. (2012), The State of Deterrence in International Politics Today. In: Contemporary Security Policy. 33 (1). URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13523260.2012.659589 [dostęp 29.12.2018]. Google Scholar

PRIOR, T. (2018), Resilience: The Fifth Wave in the Evolution of Deterrence. In: http://www.css.ethz.ch/en/services/digital-library/articles/article.html/41604a30-ae23-44c6-94d4-8cf05e316a6c/pdf [dostęp 29.12.2018 ]. Google Scholar

Przegląd (2018), Przegląd NATO. In: https://www.nato.int/docu/review/2016/also-in-2016/nato-deterrence-defence-alliance/PL/index.htm [dostęp 28.12.2018]. Google Scholar

RAI, S. B. (2017), Fourth Wave of Deterrence: Revisiting Application in the. Age of Nuclear Terrorism. New Delhi. Google Scholar

ROBERTS, P./HARDIE, A. (2015), The Validity of Deterrence in the Twenty-First Century. In: https://rusi.org/sites/default/files/201508_op_the_validity_of_deterrence.pdf [dostęp 29.08.2019]. Google Scholar

RÜHLE, M. (2015), Deterrence: what it can (and cannot) do. In: NATO Review. URL: https://www.nato.int/docu/review/2015/Also-in-2015/deterrence-russia-military/EN/index.htm [dostęp 14.03.2018]. Google Scholar

Russia Military Power (2017), Russia Military Power. Building a Military to Support Great Power Aspirations. Defense Intelligence Agency. Washington. Google Scholar

Pobierz

Opublikowane

24.09.2021

Cited By /
Share

Banasik, M. (2021). Znaczenie odstraszania strategicznego dla bezpieczeństwa międzynarodowego: Importance of strategic deterrence for international security. Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski, 12(1), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.31648/pw.6467