Cognitive Semantics Quest for the Ultimate Source Domain

Black, M. (1962), Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Brown, T.L. (2003), Making Truth: Metaphor in Science. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.   Google Scholar

Casasanto, D. (2010), Space for Thinking. In: Evans, V./Chilton, P. (eds.), Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions. London: Equinox Publishing: 453–478.   Google Scholar

Cienki, A. (1997), Some Properties and Groupings of Image Schemas. In: Verspoor, M./Lee, D./Sweetser, E. (eds.), Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction of Meaning. Amsterdam ‒ Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 3–15.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Drogosz, A. (2010), EXISTENCE IS LIFE: Metaphors of Language that Ecolinguistics Lives by. In: Puppel, S./Bogusławska-Tafelska, M. New Pathways in Linguistics. Olsztyn: Katedra Filologii Angielskiej: 59–74.   Google Scholar

Drogosz, A. (2019), A Cognitive Semantics Approach to Darwin’s Theory of Evolution. San Diego: AE Academic Publishers.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Drogosz, A. (forthcoming), A Cognitive Semantics Analysis of David Goggins’ Idea of “Transforming” Mindset. Prace Językoznawcze.   Google Scholar

Dunbar, R.I.M. (1993), Coevolution of Neocortical Size, Group Size and Language in Humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 681–735.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Epley N./Schroeder, J./Waytz, A. (2013), Motivated Mind Perception: Treating Pets as People and People as Animals. In: Gervais S.J. (ed.), Objectification and (De)Humanization. New York: Springer: 127–152.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Evans, V. (2013), Language and Time: A Cognitive Linguistics Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Evans, V./Green M. (2006), Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.   Google Scholar

Fauconnier, G./Turner, M. (2002), The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.   Google Scholar

Gibbs, R.W. (1996), Why Many Concepts Are Metaphorical. Cognition 61: 309–319.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Gould, S./Vrba, E. (1982), Exaptation – a Missing Term in the Science of Form. Paleobiology 8: 4–15.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Guthrie, S.E. (1993), Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion. New York – Oxford: Oxford University Press.   Google Scholar

Hesse, M.B. (1970 [1963]), Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.   Google Scholar

Johnson, M. (1987), The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Knowles, M./Moon, R. (2005), Introducing Metaphor. London: Routledge.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Kövecses, Z. (2002), Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. New York – Oxford: Oxford University Press.   Google Scholar

Krzeszowski, T. (1997), Angels and Devils in Hell. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Energeia.   Google Scholar

Kuhn, T.S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago – London: University of Chicago Press.   Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (1993), The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In: Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 202–251.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Lakoff, G./Johnson, M. (1980), Metaphors We Live by. Chicago – London: University of Chicago Press.   Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (1987), Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Lakoff, G./Johnson, M. (1999), Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.   Google Scholar

Lakoff, G./Núñez, R.E. (2000), Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. New York: Basic Books.   Google Scholar

Langacker, R.W. (2008), Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Macedo, F. (2015), Space as Metaphor: The Use of Spatial Metaphors in Music and Music Writing. Signata 6: 215–230.
Crossref   Google Scholar

MacKay, D.G. (1986), Prototypicality among Metaphors: On the Relative Frequency of Personification and Spatial Metaphors in Literature Written for Children Versus Adults. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 1/2: 87–107.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Mithen, S. (1998) [1996]), The Prehistory of the Mind: The Cognitive Origins of Art and Science. London – New York: Thames and Hudson.   Google Scholar

Pinker, S. (1997), How the Mind Works. New York: Norton.   Google Scholar

Radden, G. (2005), The Metaphor TIME AS SPACE across Languages. In: Górska, E./Radden, G. (eds.), Metonymy – Metaphor – Collage. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego: 99–120.   Google Scholar

Radden, G. (2011), Spatial Time in the West and the East. In: Brdar, M./Omazic, M. et al. (eds.), Space and Time in Language. Frankfurt: Peter Lang: 1–40.   Google Scholar

Rohrer, T. (2007), Embodiment and Experientialism. In: Geeraetes, D./Cuyckens, H. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press: 26–47.   Google Scholar

Rummelhart, D. (1993), Some Problems with the Notion of Literal Meanings. In: Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 71–82.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Santibañez, F. (2002), The OBJECT Image-schema and Other Dependent Schemas. Atlantis XXIV/2: 183–201.   Google Scholar

Szwedek, A. (2009a), Ontogenetic and Phylogenetic Explanations of Metaphorization. In: Wysocka, M. (ed.), On Language Structure, Acquisition and Teaching. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego: 202–210.   Google Scholar

Szwedek, A. (2009b), Conceptualization of Space and Time. In: Łobacz, P./Nowak, P./Zabrocki, W. (eds.), Language, Science and Culture. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM: 317–333.   Google Scholar

Szwedek, A. (2011), The Ultimate Source Domain. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9/2: 341–366.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Szwedek, A. (2014), The Nature of Domains and Relationships between Them in Metaphorization. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12/2: 342–374.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Tuggy, D. (2007), Schematicity. In: Geeraetes, D./Cuyckens, H. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press: 82–116.   Google Scholar

Ungerer, F./Schmid, H.-J. (1996), An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London – New York: Longman.   Google Scholar

Wickman, S.A./Daniels, M.H. et al. (1999), A “Primer” in Conceptual Metaphor for Counselors. Journal of Counseling and Development 44: 389–394.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Wilson, M. (2002), Six Views of Embodied Cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9/4: 625–636.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Zawisławska, M. (2011), Metafora w języku nauki: na przykładzie nauk przyrodniczych. Warszawa: Wydział Polonistyki.   Google Scholar

Zbikowski, L.M. (2008), Metaphor and Music. In: Gibbs, R.W. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 502–524.
Crossref   Google Scholar