FROM OBJECTIFICATION TO PERSONIFICATION. DARWIN’S CONCEPT OF (NATURAL) SELECTION
Anna Drogosz
Katedra Filologii Angielskiej Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w OlsztynieAbstrakt
The article presents an analysis of conceptual metaphors used by Darwin to describe
artificial and natural selection. It is established that three kinds of metaphorization are
employed: objectification to conceptualize artificial selection, and agentification and
personification to conceptualize natural selection. It is argued that the evidence of Darwin’s
text justifies identifying agentification as a special type of metaphorization. Further it is
claimed that the ordering of metaphors: objectification – agentification – personification
demonstrates the primacy of objectification with respect to more elaborate metaphors and
recapitulates the phylogenetic development of the process of metaphorization. The article
also addresses the motivation for Darwin’s anthropocentric language.
Słowa kluczowe:
personification, objectification, Darwin, selectionBibliografia
Darwin, C. (1998). The Origin of Species. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Dawkins, R. (2006). The Selfish Gene. 30th anniversary ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Drogosz, A. (2008). Ontological Metaphors in Darwin’s The Origin of Species. In:
S. Puppel, M. Bogusławska-Tafelska (ed.). New Pathways in Linguistics. Olsztyn, Instytut
Neofilologii, Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski, 93–120.
Drogosz, A. (2009). Metaphors of Family, Tree and Struggle in Darwin’s The Origin of
Species. In: S. Puppel, M. Bogusławska-Tafelska (ed.). New Pathways in Linguistics.
Olsztyn, Instytut Neofilologii, Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski, 109–140.
Drogosz, A. (2010). Metaphors of Time and Darwin’s Scenario of Evolution. Prace
Językoznawcze 12, 77–87.
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. New York–Oxford, Oxford University
Press.
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago–London, The University
of Chicago Press.
Ruse, M. (1999). Darwinian Revolution: Science Red in Tooth and Claw. Chicago–London,
The University of Chicago Press.
Szwedek, A. (2000). Senses, Perception and Metaphors (of Object and Objectification).
In: S. Puppel, K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk (eds.). Multis vocibus de lingua. Poznań, Wydział
Neofilologii, 143–153.
Szwedek, A. (2011). The Ultimate Source Domain. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9, 2,
341–366.
Young, R. (1985). Darwin’s Metaphor: Nature’s Place in Victorian Culture. Cambridge–New
York, Cambridge University Press.
Katedra Filologii Angielskiej Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie
Inne teksty tego samego autora
- Anna Drogosz, EVOLUTIONARY CHANGE IS A JOURNEY: FROM DARWIN TO DAWKINS , Acta Neophilologica: Tom 2 Nr XV (2013): Acta Neophilologica
- Anna Drogosz, THE CONCEPTUAL DISTINCTION BETWEEN POLISH MARKERS1 OF REFLEXTVTTY: SIEBIE AND SIĘ , Acta Neophilologica: Nr VII (2005): Acta Neophilologica
- Anna Drogosz, CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS OF PROGRESS IN DARWIN’S THEORY OF EVOLUTION , Acta Neophilologica: Tom 2 Nr XIV (2012): Acta Neophilologica