PRZEŚLADOWANIA KOŚCIOŁA KATOLICKIEGO NA ZIEMIACH POLSKICH W DOBIE POWSTANIA STYCZNIOWEGO W ŚWIETLE RAPORTU KONSULATU FRANCJI W WARSZAWIE Z 1869 ROKU

Jacek Wojda

doi:10.31648/cetl.2343

Opublikowane: 2016-12-291

Tom 12 Nr 4 (2016)

PRZEŚLADOWANIA KOŚCIOŁA KATOLICKIEGO NA ZIEMIACH POLSKICH W DOBIE POWSTANIA STYCZNIOWEGO W ŚWIETLE RAPORTU KONSULATU FRANCJI W WARSZAWIE Z 1869 ROKU

Jacek Wojda

Civitas et Lex

Dział: Varia

https://doi.org/10.31648/cetl.2343

Abstrakt

Seventieth of XIX century were very hard time for Catholic Church in Polish Kingdom. Main
reason was aim for independency in Poles’ hearts. Deeply connected with polish nation, Church
suffered because of Tsar’ political repression. Although different stages of its history are not closely
connected with post uprising’s repressions.
Report of French General Consulate in Warsaw bearing a date 1869 stress accent on same
kind of the Catholic Church persecutions, which were undertaken against bishops and diocese
administrators, and some of them were died during deportation on Siberia, north or south Russia.
Hierarchy was put in a difficult position. They had to choose or to subordinate so called Rome Catholic
Spiritual Council in Petersburg or stay by the Apostolic See side. Bishop Konstanty Łubieński is
acknowledged as the first Victim of that repressions.
Outlook upon history of persecutions, which is presented, shows not only Church but points
out harmful consequences Russia’s politics in the Church and society of the Polish Kingdom. Cited
archival source lets us know way of looking and analysing history during 1861−1869 by French
diplomats.

Słowa kluczowe:

French General Consulate in Warsaw, Catholic Church in the Polish Kingdom, Rome Catholic Spiritual Council in Petersburg, Church persecutions, Meyer’s report, translation

Pobierz pliki

PDF

Zasady cytowania

Wojda, J. (2016). PRZEŚLADOWANIA KOŚCIOŁA KATOLICKIEGO NA ZIEMIACH POLSKICH W DOBIE POWSTANIA STYCZNIOWEGO W ŚWIETLE RAPORTU KONSULATU FRANCJI W WARSZAWIE Z 1869 ROKU. Civitas Et Lex, 12(4), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.31648/cetl.2343

Cited by / Share