LE REGOLE DELLA NAVIGAZIONE. LA RESPONSABILITÀ DELL’ARMATORE NELL’ETÀ DEI SEVERI

Maria Casola

doi:10.31648/cetl.2014

Published: 2014-09-301

Vol. 3 No. 3 (2014)

LE REGOLE DELLA NAVIGAZIONE. LA RESPONSABILITÀ DELL’ARMATORE NELL’ETÀ DEI SEVERI

Maria Casola

Civitas et Lex

Section: Legal Sciences

https://doi.org/10.31648/cetl.2014

Abstract

In the famous passage of D. 4.9.3.1, Ulpiano reported and commented on the heading
praetorium of the Edict that regulated the failure to return things entrusted to nautae, caupones
and stabularii. He highlighted the issue of the scope of the action honorary ex recepto respect to
civil actions (locati-conducti), to assure the integrity of the thing received in the case of maritime
transport. The same Ulpiano, continuing, recalled an innovation proposal and obtained in the
Augustan age by Labeo, which consists of a exceptio in factum, such as to relieve the shipowner
from the risk of deterioration of the thing in case of naufragium and vis piratarum.
The ‘readings’ of the passage have been numerous and often divergent. This seems to justify
a review, which, based on abundant and perspicuous readings that interpreters of the text have
provided, intended to further deepen the fragment D. 4.9.3.1, both in its content (initial and
successive, until Justinian) as the inside thoughts and work of Ulpiano.

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Casola, M. (2014). LE REGOLE DELLA NAVIGAZIONE. LA RESPONSABILITÀ DELL’ARMATORE NELL’ETÀ DEI SEVERI. Civitas Et Lex, 3(3), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.31648/cetl.2014

Cited by / Share

References

O. Lenel, Das Edictum perpetuum, Aalen 19273, § 49, p. 131.
Google Scholar

Google Scholar

F.M De Robertis, Receptum nautarum, Studio sulla responsabilità dell’armatore in diritto romano, con riferimento alla disciplina particolare concernente il caupo e lo stabularius, in Annali Fac. Giur., Bari 1952, p.125−133.
Google Scholar

Google Scholar

S. Tafaro, La interpretatio ai verba ‘quanti ea res est‘ nella giurisprudenza romana. L’analisi di Ulpiano, Napoli 1980
Google Scholar

Google Scholar

L.R. Ménager, “Naulum” et “receptum rem salvam fore”. Contribution a l’étude de la responsabilité contractuelle dans les trasports maritimes, en droit romain, RHD 38 (1960), p. 407;
Google Scholar

Google Scholar

C.A. Cannata, Ricerche sulla responsabilità contrattuale nel diritto romano, I, Milano 1966, p. 106
Google Scholar