Meaning construal of selected novel eponymous verbs in the current political discourse in Poland: A Cognitive Linguistics account

Joanna Paszenda

Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6741-0579

Iwona Góralczyk

Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie UWM
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2845-7267


Abstract

The aim of the article is to propose a Cognitive Linguistics analysis of the semantic construal of selected Polish name-based verbal neologisms and occasionalisms currently used in Polish mass media, such as kidawić [←Małgorzata Kidawa-Błońska], jandować [←Krystyna Janda], obajtkować [←Daniel Obajtek]. In particular, eponymous verbs are treated as constructions whose meanings are negotiated in the dynamic interaction between language users on the basis of the local co-text and shared background knowledge. Name-based verbs convey a wide range of rich, context-dependent meanings as well as the speaker’s (usually negative) evaluation in a very condensed manner. Their holistic interpretation is arrived at in the process of conceptual integration. It has been shown that a chain of paragon-like metonymies licenses the understanding of the proper name in the verb’s base. What is more, depending on the context of use, metonymies may be coupled with syntaphoric or metaphorical mapping(s).


Keywords:

name-based verbs, neologism, occasionalism, motivation, metonymy, syntaphor, conceptual integration


Augustyn R. (2017): Deciphering novel expressions: A proposal for an integrated cognitive meaning construction analysis. “Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska. Sectio FF. Philologiae” 35(2), pp. 193–204.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Berend M. (2007): Nazwiska polityków jako baza derywacyjna. [In:] Nowe nazwy własne – nowe tendencje badawcze. A. Cieślikowa, B. Czopek-Kopciuch & K. Skowronek (eds). Kraków, pp. 287–296.   Google Scholar

Bierwiaczonek B. (2013): Metonymy in Language Thought and Brain. Sheffield.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Bierwiaczonek B. (2020a): Figures of speech revisited: Introducing syntonymy and syntaphor. [In:] Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language. A. Baicchi (ed.). Amsterdam, pp. 225–252.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Bierwiaczonek B. (2020b): People as points of reference. How famous and infamous individuals become part of language. “SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics” 17(3), pp. 20–33.   Google Scholar

Booij G. (2013): Morphology in Construction Grammar. [In:] The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (eds). Oxford–New York, pp. 255–273.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Brdar M. (2017): Metonymy and Word-Formation: Their Interactions and Complementation. Cambridge.   Google Scholar

Brdar M., Brdar-Szabó R. (2007): When Zidane is not simply Zidane, and Bill Gates is not just Bill Gates: Some thoughts on the construction of metaphtonymic meanings of proper names. [In:] Aspects of Meaning Construction. G. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, T. Berg & P. Siemund (eds). Amsterdam, pp. 125–142.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Brdar M., Brdar-Szabó R. (2013): Some reflections on metonymy and word-formation. “Explorations in English Language and Linguistics” 1.1, pp. 40–62.   Google Scholar

Brdar-Szabó R., Brdar M. (2017): Doing Tsukahara and the Epley in a cross-linguistic perspective. [In:] Constructing Families of Constructions: Analytical Perspectives and Theoretical Challenges. F. Ruiz de Mendoza et al. (eds). Amsterdam, pp. 7–107.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Croft W., Cruse A.D. (2004): Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Dereń B. (2005): Pochodne nazw własnych w słowniku i w tekście. Opole.   Google Scholar

Dirven R. (1999): Conversion as a conceptual metonymy of event schemata. [In:] Metonymy in Language and Thought. K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (eds). Amsterdam, pp. 275–287.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Duszak A. (2002): Us and others: An introduction. [In:] Us and Others: Social Identities Across Languages, Discourses and Cultures. A. Duszak (ed.). Amsterdam, pp. 1–28.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Fauconnier G. (2009): Generalized integration networks. [In:] New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics. V. Evans & S. Pourcel (eds). Amsterdam, pp. 147–160.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Fauconnier G., Turner M. (2002): The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Geeraerts D., Cuyckens H. (eds) (2007): The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford–New York.   Google Scholar

Goossens L. (2002): Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. [In:] Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. R. Dirven & R. Pörings (eds). Berlin–New York, pp. 349–378.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Grzegorczykowa R. (1979): Zarys słowotwórstwa polskiego: Słowotwórstwo opisowe. Warszawa.   Google Scholar

Grzegorczykowa R., Puzynina J. (1999): Problemy ogólne słowotwórstwa. [In:] Gramatyka współczesnego języka polskiego. Morfologia. R. Grzegorczykowa, R. Laskowski & H. Wróbel (eds). Warszawa, pp. 361–388.   Google Scholar

Hoffmann T., Trousdale G. (eds) (2013): The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford–New York.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Kudra B. (2016): O niektórych właściwościach nowych derywatów czasownikowych. „Rozprawy Komisji Jezykowej ŁTN” 62, pp. 49–57.   Google Scholar

Langacker R.W. (2008): Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Milewska B. (2019): Ze zjawisk słowotwórstwa analogicznego: odjaniepawlać, odjaniepawlać się. [In:] Wokół słów i znaczeń VIII: Słowotwórstwo apelatywne i onomastyczne. E. Rogowska-Cybulska, A. Lica & E. Badyda (eds). Gdańsk, pp. 123–132.   Google Scholar

Ostromęcka-Frączak B. (2001): Nazwy własne jako podstawy derywacji. [In:] Współczesna leksyka. Vol. II. K. Michalewski (ed.). Łódź, pp. 67–75.   Google Scholar

Panther K.-U., Radden G. (2011): Introduction: Reflections on motivation revisited. [In:] Motivation in Grammar and the Lexicon. K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (eds). Amsterdam, pp. 1–26.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Paszenda J., Góralczyk I. (2018): Metonymic motivations behind paragonic uses of proper names in political discourse: a cognitive linguistic approach. „Linguistica Silesiana” 39, pp. 211–235.   Google Scholar

Plag I. (1998): The polysemy of -ize derivatives: The role of semantics in word formation. [In:] Yearbook of Morphology 1997. G. Booij & J. van Marle (eds). Dordrecht, pp. 219–242.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Radden G. (2002): How metonymic are metaphors? [In:] Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. R. Dirven & R. Pörings (eds). Berlin–New York, pp. 407–434.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Radden G., Kövecses Z. (1999): Towards a theory of metonymy. [In:] Metonymy in Language and Thought. K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (eds). Amsterdam, pp. 17–59.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Real Puigdollers C. (2013): Lexicalization by Phase: The Role of Prepositions in Argument Structure and Its Cross-Linguistic Variation. Doctoral Dissertation, , accessed 01.01.2022.   Google Scholar

Ruiz de Mendoza F.J., Mairal Usón R. (2007): High-level metaphor and metonymy in meaning construction. [In:] Aspects of Meaning Construction. G. Radden, K-M. Köpcke, T. Berg & P. Siemund (eds). Amsterdam, pp. 33–51.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Schönefeld D. (2005): Zero-derivation – functional change – metonymy. [In:] Approaches to Conversion/ Zero-Derivation. L. Bauer & S. Valera (eds). Münster–New York, pp. 131–157.   Google Scholar

Szymanek B. (1983): Introduction to Morphological Analysis. Warszawa.   Google Scholar

Szymanek B. (2010): A Panorama of Polish Word-Formation. Lublin.   Google Scholar

Štekauer P. (2014): Derivational paradigms. [In:] The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology. R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (eds). Oxford, pp. 354–369.   Google Scholar

Waszakowa K. (1993): Słowotwórstwo współczesnego języka polskiego. Rzeczowniki z formantami paradygmatycznymi. Warszawa.   Google Scholar

Waszakowa K. (2015): Foreign word-formation in Polish. [In:] Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe. P.O. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen & F. Rainer (eds). Berlin, pp. 1679–1696.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Waszakowa K. (2017): Kognitywno-komunikacyjne aspekty słowotwórstwa: Wybrane zagadnienia opisu derywacji w języku polskim. Warszawa.   Google Scholar

Waszakowa K. (2020): O terminologii kognitywnej z perspektywy słowotwórstwa (na przykładzie polszczyzny). „Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego” 76, pp. 145–164.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Witaszek-Samborska M. (2006): Eponimy wśród neologizmów współczesnej polszczyzny. „Białostockie Archiwum Językowe” 6, pp. 163–172.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Wróbel H. (1999): Czasownik. [In:] Gramatyka współczesnego języka polskiego. Morfologia. R. Grzegorczykowa, R. Laskowski & H. Wróbel (eds). Warszawa, pp. 536–584.   Google Scholar


Published
2025-03-22

Cited by
Crossref
0
Scopus
0

Paszenda, J. ., & Góralczyk, I. (2025). Meaning construal of selected novel eponymous verbs in the current political discourse in Poland: A Cognitive Linguistics account. Prace Językoznawcze, 27(1), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.31648/pj.10949

Joanna Paszenda 
Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6741-0579
Iwona Góralczyk 
Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie UWM
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2845-7267