Treatment recommendations as complex activities: A sequential unfolding of acceptance

Ajdukiewicz K. (1975): Logika pragmatyczna. Warszawa.   Google Scholar

Barnes R.K., Woods C.J. (2024): Communication in Primary Healthcare: A State-of-the-Art Literature Review of Conversation-Analytic Research. Research on Language and Social Interaction 57(1), pp. 7–37.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Bolden G. (2008): “So what’s up?”: Using the discourse marker So to launch conversational business. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(3), pp. 302–337.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Coulter A., Jenkinson C. (2005): European patients’ views on the responsiveness of health systems and healthcare providers. European Journal of Public Health 15(4), pp. 355–360.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Czachowski S., Pawlikowska T. (2011): “These reforms killed me”: doctors’ perceptions of family medicine during the transition from communism to capitalism. Family Practice, pp. 1–7.
Crossref   Google Scholar

De Marco G. et al. (2024): What makes a medical intervention invasive?. Journal of Medical Ethics 50(4), pp. 226–233.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Drew P. (1992): Contested evidence in a courtroom cross-examination: the case of a trial for rape. [W:] Talk at Work: Social Interaction in Institutional Settings. P. Drew, J. Heritage (eds). Cambridge, pp. 470–520.   Google Scholar

Drew P., Heritage J. (1992): Talk at Work: Language Use in Institutional and Work-Place Settings. Cambridge.   Google Scholar

Ekberg K., Beach W.A., Jones D. (2024): Communication in Outpatient Secondary Care: A State-of-the-Art Literature Review of Conversation-Analytic Research. Research on Language and Social Interaction 57(1), pp. 38–54.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Gill V.T., Pomerantz A., Denvir P. (2009): Pre-emptive resistance: patients’ participation in diagnostic sense-making activities. Sociology of Health and Illness 32(1), pp. 1–20.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Heritage J. (2008): Conversation Analysis as Social Theory. [W:] The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. B. Turner (ed.). Oxford, pp. 300–320.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Heritage J. (2012): Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45, pp. 1–25.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Heritage J. (2013): Action formation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds. Discourse Studies 15(5), pp. 551–578.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Heritage J., Clayman S.E. (2010): Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities and Institutions. Oxford.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Jefferson G. (1984): On Stepwise Transition From Talk About a Trouble to Inappropriately Next-Positioned Matters. [W:] Structures of Social Action. J.M. Atkinson, J. Heritage (eds). Cambridge, pp. 191–221.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Jefferson G. (1986): Notes on ‘Latency’ in Overlap Onset. Human Studies 9, pp. 153–183.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Jefferson G. (1990): List Construction as a Task and Interactional Resource. [W:] Interaction Competence. G. Psathas (ed.). Lanham, pp. 63–92.   Google Scholar

Jefferson G. (2004): Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. [W:] Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. G.H. Lerner (ed.). Amsterdam, pp. 13–31.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Koenig Ch.J. (2008): The interactional dynamics of treatment counseling in primary care. [Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of California Los Angeles].   Google Scholar

Kärkkäinen E. (2003): Epistemic stance in English conversation: A description of its interactional functions, with a focus on I think. Amsterdam.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Lerner G. (1991): On the Syntax of Sentences in Progress. Language in Society 20, pp. 441–458.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Lerner G. (1996): On the ‘semi-permeable’ character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. [W:] Interaction and Grammar. E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff, S.A. Thompson (eds). Cambridge, pp. 238–276.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Marcinowicz L., Chlabicz S., Grebowski R. (2009): Patient satisfaction with healthcare provided by family doctors: primary dimensions and an attempt at typology. BMC Health Services Research 9(63).
Crossref   Google Scholar

Maynard D. (1980): Placement of topic changes in conversation. Semiotica 30, pp. 263–290.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Oleszczyk M., et al. (2012): Family medicine in post-communist Europe needs a boost. Exploring the position of family medicine in healthcare systems of Central and Eastern Europe and Russia. BMC Family Practice 13(15).
Crossref   Google Scholar

Ostrowska A. (2003): Poverty as a Factor Influencing Doctor – Patient Partnerships: Case Poland. Social Exclusion, Inequality, and Health: An International Workshop. Brown University.   Google Scholar

Ostrowska A. (2011): Paternalizm i partnerstwo. Społeczny kontekst relacji lekarz-pacjent. [W:] Etyczne aspekty decyzji medycznych. J. Hartman, M. Waligóra (eds). Warszawa.   Google Scholar

Piasecka-Robak A. (2020): Health communication in Poland: Barriers Precluding Hope For Good Physician-Patient Communication. [W:] Education Excellence and Innovation Management: A 2025 Vision to Sustain Economic Development during Global Challenges. K.S. Solimas (ed.). Proceedings of the 35th International Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA). Spain, pp. 16703–16712.   Google Scholar

Rancew-Sikora D. (2007): Analiza konwersacyjna jako metoda badania rozmów codziennych. Warszawa.   Google Scholar

Ratajska A., Nowakowska-Arendt A., Zając M. (2023): Teaching clinical communication skills in postgraduate medical education with particular emphasis on palliative medicine. Palliative Medicine in Practice 17(2), pp. 105–110.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Sacks H. (1995): Lectures on Conversation. Oxford.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Sacks H., Schegloff E.A., Jefferson G. (1974): A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4), pp. 696–735.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Schegloff E.A. (1987): Analyzing Single Episodes of Interaction: An Exercise in Conversation Analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly 50(2), pp. 101–114.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Schegloff E.A. (2007): Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Vol. 1. Cambridge.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Schegloff E.A., Sacks H. (1973): Opening up closings. Semiotica 8, pp. 289–327.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Schiffrin D. (1987): Discourse Markers. Cambridge.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Sidnell J., Stivers T. (2012): The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Boston.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Stangierska I., Sikorska-Horst W. (2007): Ogólne zasady komunikacji między pacjentem a lekarzem. Forum Medycyny Rodzinnej 1(1), pp. 58–68.   Google Scholar

Stivers T. (2004): “No no no” and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction. Human Communication Research 30(2), pp. 260–293.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Stivers T. (2005): Parent Resistance to Physicians’ Treatment Recommendations: One Resource for Initiating a Negotiation of the Treatment Decision. Health Communication 18(1), pp. 41–74.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Stivers T. (2007): Prescribing Under Pressure: Parent-Physician Conversations and Antibiotics. New York City.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Stivers T., Hayashi M. (2010): Transformative Answers: One Way to Resist a Question’s Constraints. Language in Society 39(01), pp. 1–25.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Stivers T., Tate A. (2023): The Role of Health Care Communication in Treatment Outcomes. Annual Review of Linguistics 9, pp. 233–252.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Toerien M. (2021): When do patients exercise their right to refuse treatment? A conversation analytic study of decision-making trajectories in UK neurology outpatient consultations. Soc Sci Med 290, s. 114278.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Wang N. (2023): Resistance to treatment recommendations: An interactional resource to increase information exchange and promote shared decision-making in medical encounters. [W:] Language, Health and Culture. N. Wang (ed.), pp. 60–81.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Weidner M. (2012): On the organization of doctor-patient communication in Polish talk-in-interaction: practices for building questions, negotiating knowledge and recommending treatment. [Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Antwerp].   Google Scholar

Weidner M. (2018): Treating something as self-evident: No-prefaced turns in Polish. [W:] Between Turn and Sequence. Turn-initial particles across languages. J. Heritage, M.-L. Sorjonen (eds). Amsterdam, pp. 225–250.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Wierzbicka A. (2003): Cross-cultural pragmatics: the semantics of human interaction. Berlin.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Zinken J. (2016): Requesting Responsibility. The Morality of Grammar in Polish and English Family Interaction. Oxford.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Zinken J., Ogiermann E. (2011): How to propose an action as objectively necessary: the case of Polish Trzeba X (“one needs to x”). Research on Language and Social Interaction 44(3), pp. 263–287.
Crossref   Google Scholar