Personal names in conversational discourse – a survey research approach

Aleksander Kiklewicz

Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie UWM
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6140-6368


Abstract

The study is grounded in the theory of functional semantics (specifically, functional onomastics) as a branch of contemporary linguistics within the framework of functional pragmatism. Drawing on E. Goffman’s concept of participation framework, the author presents results of an analysis based on survey data collected from 186 young Polish men and women. The study is focused on the referential use of personal names – both appellative and proper – in conversational discourse. The survey revealed that the nomination of third
persons varies depending on the communicative situation, particularly with respect
to parameters such as the composition and number of participants, the configuration
of participatory roles, social status relations, and the formal or informal nature of the
contact between interlocutors. The survey confirmed that respondents adhered to the
principles of third-person nomination in conversational discourse previously identified
in text-based studies: the principle of naming consensus, the principle of attribution,
the principle of direct relation, the principle of closest relation (or nearest designation),
the principle of empathy, the principle of respect and seniority, the principle of definiteness,
and the principle of minimal designation. The general conclusion of the study is that the
nomination of persons in conversational discourse is governed by the principle of relativity:
the greater the degree of mutual familiarity between participants, as well as their
familiarity with the third person, the lesser the amount of language material required
in the act of nomination.


Keywords:

lexicology, semantics, nomination, anthroponym, reference names, conversational discourse


Awdiejew A., Habrajska G. (2004): Wprowadzenie do gramatyki komunikacyjnej, 1. Łask.   Google Scholar

Awdiejew A., Habrajska G. (2006): Wprowadzenie do gramatyki komunikacyjnej, 2. Łask.   Google Scholar

Cicourel A.V. (1987): The Interpenetration of Communicative Contexts: Examples from Medical Encounters. „Social Psychology Quarterly” 50(2), s. 217–226.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Goffman E. (1992): Forms of Talk. Philadelphia.   Google Scholar

Grabias S. (2003): Język w zachowaniach społecznych. Lublin.   Google Scholar

Grice H.P. (1975): Logic and conversation. [W:] Syntax and semantics, 3. Red. P. Cole, J.L. Morgan. New York, s. 41–58.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Grice H.P. (1977): Logika a konwersacja. „Przegląd Humanistyczny” VI, s. 85–99.   Google Scholar

Jakobson R. (1989): W poszukiwaniu istoty języka, 1. Warszawa.   Google Scholar

Kiklewicz A. (2004): Podstawy składni funkcjonalnej. Olsztyn.   Google Scholar

Kiklewicz A. (2025): Językowe środki identyfikacji osób trzecich w dyskursie konwersacyjnym. „Poradnik Językowy” 1, s. 7–37.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Kuno S. (1987): Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy. Chicago.   Google Scholar

Kurcz I. (2005): Psychologia języka i komunikacji. Warszawa.   Google Scholar

Leech G. (1983): Principles of Pragmatics. London.   Google Scholar

Leszczak O. (2008): Lingwosemiotyczna teoria doświadczenia. T. 1: Funkcjonalno-pragmatyczna metodologia badań lingwosemiotycznych. Kielce.   Google Scholar

Leszczak O. (2009): Lingwosemiotyczna teoria doświadczenia. T. 2: Doświadczenie potoczne a językowy obraz świata. Kielce.   Google Scholar

Sapir E. (1949): Culture Language and Personality: selected essays. Berkeley.   Google Scholar

Schmid H.-J. (1999): Towards a functional-cognitive lexicology of nouns. [W:] Words, Lexemes, Concepts – Approaches to the Lexicon studies in honour of Leonhard Lipka. Red. W. Falkner & H.-J. Schmid. Tübingen, s. 213–226.   Google Scholar

Šrámek R. (2019): The Model of a Generic Concept and Structure of Functional Onomastics. „Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska Lublin – Polonia” XXXVII(1), s. 14–33.   Google Scholar


Published
2026-03-31

Cited by

Kiklewicz, A. (2026). Personal names in conversational discourse – a survey research approach. Papers in Linguistics, 28(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.31648/pj.12277

Aleksander Kiklewicz 
Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie UWM
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6140-6368