“Now, correct me if I’m wrong, but it seems to me that […]”. First person singular pronouns as markers of (inter)subjectivity
Shala Barczewska
Uniwersytet Jana Kochanowskiego, KielceAbstract
This article looks at the use of first-person singular pronouns in the 2008
debate between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox “Has Science Buried God?”
References
Almeida, Sandra; Ferrari, Lillian (2012): Subjectivity, Intersubjectivity and Epistemic Complementation Constructions. In Selected Papers from UK-CLA Meetings 1, pp. 110–127. http://www.uk-cla.org.uk/files/proceedings/Almeida%20and%20Ferrari.pdf, accessed 6/12/2016. Google Scholar
Barczewska, Shala (forthcoming): On stage or off, or somewhere in between? Intersubjectivity markers in Dawkins and Lennox debate: “Has Science Buried God?”. In LaMiCuS 1. Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile (1971): Problems in general linguistics. Coral Gables, Fla.: University of Miami Press. Google Scholar
Closs-Traugott, Elizabeth (2010): (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Hubert Cuyckens, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte (Eds.): Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, vol. 66. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter (Topics in English Linguistics), pp. 29–74. Google Scholar
Croft, William (2009): Toward a social cognitive linguistics. In Vyvyan Evans, Stephanie Pourcel (Eds.): New directions in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub. Co. (Human cognitive processing, v. 24), pp. 395–420. Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard (2006): The God delusion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co. Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard; McKean, Dave (2011): The magic of reality. How we know what’s really true. London: Bantam. Google Scholar
Drogosz, Anna; Górska, Aleksandra (forthcoming): Not to be impolite, but this is war. How the impolite strategy of challenge is utilised and countered in debates between atheists and Christians. Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles; Turner, Mark (2002): The way we think. Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar
Górska, Aleksandra (2015): ‘Natural selection’ of ideas in the evolutionist/creationist debate. ICA Łódź Regional Conference. Expanding Communication: Old Boundaries and New Frontiers, 4/9/2015. Google Scholar
Górska, Aleksandra (2016): “I Find That Unconvincing”: Frames of Self- and Other-Presentation in the Debate Has Science Buried God? Languages in Contact, 5/29/2016. Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. (1999): Losing control: Grammaticization, subjectification, and transparency. In Andreas Blank & Peter Koch (Eds.). Historical semantics and cognition (Cognitive linguistics research 13). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 147–175. Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. (2007): Constructing the meanings of personal pronouns. In Günter Radden (Ed.): Aspects of meaning construction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 171–187. Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. (2008): Cognitive grammar. A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Lennox, John C. (2009): God’s undertaker. Has science buried God? New updated ed. Oxford: Lion. Google Scholar
Lennox, John C. (2011): Gunning for God. Why the new atheists are missing the target? Oxford: Lion. Google Scholar
Oxford Dictionaries (2017). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available online at https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/. Google Scholar
Scott, Mike (2017): WordSmith Tools version 6: Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software. Available online at http://lexically.net/wordsmith/. Google Scholar
Sinclair, John (2004): Trust the text. London: Routledge. Tomasello, Michael (2000): Culture and Cognitive Development. In Current Developments in Psychological Science 9 (2), pp. 37–40. Google Scholar
Verhagen, Arie (2003): Semantics, Inferential Cognition and Understanding Text. In Ellen van Wolde (Ed.): Job 28. Cognition in Context. 64 volumes. Leiden: Brill (Biblical Interpretation Series), pp. 231–251. Google Scholar
Verhagen, Arie (2010): Constructions of intersubjectivity. Discourse, syntax, and cognition. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Uniwersytet Jana Kochanowskiego, Kielce