Not to be impolite, but this is war: How the impolite strategy of challenge is utilised and countered in debates between atheists and Christians

Bousfield, D. (2008): Impoliteness in interaction. Philadelphia: John Benjamins:.   Google Scholar

Coulson, S. (2001): Semantic Leaps. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.   Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan (1996): “Towards an anatomy of impoliteness”. Journal of Pragmatics 25, 349–367.   Google Scholar

Evans, V. and M. Green (2006): Cognitive Linguistics. An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.   Google Scholar

Fixed Point Foundation. (2009): Has Science Buried God? (DOA Jan. 1st 2013, from https://shop.fixed-point.org/collections/debates-video/products/has-science-buried-god-video?variant=4048097412.   Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1967): Interaction ritual. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.   Google Scholar

Kövecses, Z. (2002): Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.   Google Scholar

Jay, W. (1992): Cursing in America: a psycholinguistic study of dirty language in the courts, in the movies, in the schoolyards and on the streets. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.   Google Scholar

Labov, W. and D. Fanshel (1977): Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic Press.   Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson (1980): Metaphors we Live by. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.   Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey N. (1983): Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.   Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C. (1979): “Activity types and language”. Linguistics 17 (5/6): 365–399.   Google Scholar

Sacks H., Schegloff E.A., Jefferson G. (1998) [1974]: ‘A Simplest Systematics for the Organisation of Turn-taking for Conversation’. In Asa Kasher (ed.) Pragmatics: Critical Concepts vol. 5, pp193−242. Routledge London 1998.   Google Scholar

Thomas, J. (1995): Meaning in interaction. London and New York: Longman.   Google Scholar

Ungerer, F. and H.-J. Schmid (1996): An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. Longman: London and New York.   Google Scholar