A Cognitive Semantics analysis of David Goggins’ idea of “transforming” mindset
Anna Drogosz
Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w OlsztynieАннотация
The objective of the paper is an analysis of how David Goggins describes his life in his book Can’t Hurt Me. The analysis was conducted within the methodological framework of the Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Blending Theory. It has been established that the metaphors life is a journey and aspects of the self are individuals at war provide coherence to the story of his life, while conceptual blends are a mental tool used to reframe a situation and himself. As a result of implementing those blends in his thinking, David Goggins has developed a mindset that allowed him to transform from a broken teenager to “the strongest man alive”. This case study reveals how specific conceptual blends may impact not only cognition and language in general, as is argued in Cognitive Semantics, but also one’s emotional state, and consequently one’s physical performance.
Ключевые слова:
David Goggins, conceptual blending, mindset, conceptual metaphorsБиблиографические ссылки
Fauconnier G. (1997): Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Fauconnier G., Turner M. (2002): The Way We Think. Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Gibbs R.W. (2009): Why do some People Dislike Conceptual Metaphor Theory? “Cognitive Semiotics” 5(1–2), pp. 14–36.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Goggins D. (2018): Can’t Hurt Me. Master Your Mind and Defy the Odds. Austin. Google Scholar
Johnson M. (1987): The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Keysar B., Shen Y., Glucksberg S., et al. (2000): Conventional Language: How Metaphorical is it? “Journal of Memory and Language” 43, pp. 576–593.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Kövecses Z. (2002): Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. New York–Oxford. Google Scholar
Kövecses Z. (2020): Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Lakoff G., Johnson M. (1980): Metaphors We Live By. Chicago–London. Google Scholar
Lakoff G., Johnson M. (1999): Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York. Google Scholar
Libura A. (2010): Teoria przestrzeni mentalnych i integracji pojęciowej. Struktura modelu i jego funkcjonalność. Wrocław. Google Scholar
Ortony A. (1993): Metaphor, Language, and Thought. [In:] Metaphor and Thought. A. Ortony (ed.). Cambridge, pp. 1–16.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Rohrer T. (2007): Embodiment and Exprientialism. [In:] The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. D. Geeraetes, H. Cuyckens (eds). Oxford–New York, pp. 26–47. Google Scholar
Turner M. (2007): Conceptual Integration. [In:] The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. D. Geeraerts, H. Cuyckens (eds). Oxford–New York, pp. 377–393. Google Scholar
Wilson M. (2002): Six Views of Embodied Cognition. “Psychonomic Bulletin & Review” 9(4), pp. 625–636.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie
