Zmiany klimatu w dyskursie „Gazety Wyborczej” i „Rzeczpospolitej” w latach 2015–2022: ujęcie korpusowe

Bakaki Z., Bernauer T. (2017): Do global climate summits influence public awareness and policy preferences concerning climate change? „Environmental Politics” 26(1), s. 1–26.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Baker P. (2006): Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Baykan B. (2019): What did the Turkish climate movement learn from a global policy failure? Frame shift after the Copenhagen Climate Summit. „Turkish Studies” 20, 4, s. 637–655.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Bäckstrand K., Lövbrand E. (2019): The Road to Paris: Contending climate governance discourses in the post-Copenhagen era. „Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning” 21(5), s. 519–532.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Bevitori C. (2010): Representations of Climate Change: News and Opinion Discourse in UK and US Quality Press: A Corpus-Assisted Discourse Study. Bologna.   Google Scholar

Bińczyk E. (2018): Epoka człowieka. Retoryka i marazm antropocenu. Warszawa.   Google Scholar

Boykoff M. (2013): Public enemy No1? Understanding media representations of outlier views on climate change. „American Behavioural Scientist” 57, s. 796–817.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Boykoff M. et al. (2023): World Newspaper Coverage of Climate Change or Global Warming, 2004–2023. „Media and Climate Change Observatory Data Sets”. Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences. University of Colorado.   Google Scholar

Brezina V. (2018): Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A Practical Guide. Cambridge.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Christensen M., Wormbs N. (2017): Global Climate Talks from Failure to Cooperation and Hope: Swedish News Framings of COP15 and COP21. „Environmental Communication” 11(5), s. 682–699.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Czyżewski M., Kowalski S., Piotrowski A. (2010): Wprowadzenie. [W:] Rytualny chaos. Studium dyskursu publicznego. Red. M. Czyżewski, S. Kowalski, A. Piotrowski. Warszawa, s. 15–48.   Google Scholar

Gillings M., Dayrell C. (2023): Climate change in the UK press: Examining discourse fluctuation over time. „Applied Linguistics”.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Grundmann R., Scott M. (2014): Disputed climate science in the media: Do countries matter? „Public Understanding of Science” 23(2), s. 220–235.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Grzmil-Tylutki H. (2000): Francuski i polski dyskurs ekologiczny w perspektywie aksjologii. Kraków.   Google Scholar

Kaiser J., Rhomberg M. (2016): Questioning the Doubt: Climate Skepticism in German Newspaper Reporting on COP17. „Environmental Communication” 10(5), s. 556–574.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Karlsen R., Aalberg T. (2023): Social media and trust in news: An experimental study of the effect of Facebook on news story credibility. „Digital Journalism” 11(1), s. 144–160.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Kilgarriff A. et al. (2014): The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. „Lexicography” 1(1), s. 7–36.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Liu M., Huang J. (2022): “Climate change” vs. “global warming”: A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of two popular terms in The New York Times. „Journal of World Languages” 8(1), s. 34–55.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Liu M., Li C. (2017): Competing discursive constructions of China’s smog in Chinese and Anglo-American English-language newspapers: A corpus-assisted discourse study. „Discourse & Communication” 11(4), s. 386–403.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Liu M., Zhang Y. (2018): Discursive constructions of scientific (un)certainty about the health risks of China’s air pollution: A corpus-assisted discourse study. „Language & Communication” 60, s. 1–10.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Nerlich B., Koteyko N. (2009): Compounds, creativity and complexity in climate change communication: The case of ‘carbon indulgences’. „Global Environmental Change” 19(3), s. 345–353.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Orna-Montesinos C. (2015): The discourses of sustainability in news magazines: The rhetorical construction of journalistic stance. „Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics” 28(2), s. 442–464.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Parker C.F., Karlsson C. (2018): The UN climate change negotiations and the role of the United States: Assessing American leadership from Copenhagen to Paris. „Environmental Politics” 27(3), s. 519–540.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Poole R. (2016): A corpus-aided ecological discourse analysis of the Rosemont Copper Mine debate of Arizona, USA. „Discourse & Communication” 10(6), s. 576–595.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Reisigl M., Wodak R. (2009): The discourse-historical approach. [W:] Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Red. R. Wodak, M. Meyer. London, s. 87–121.   Google Scholar

Ruffolo I. (2015): The greening of hotels in the UK and Italy: A cross-cultural study of the promotion of environmental sustainability of comparable corpora of hotel websites. „Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences” 198, s. 397–408.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Schäfer M.S., Ivanova A., Schmidt A. (2014): What drives media attention for climate change?: Explaining issue attention in Australian, German and Indian print media from 1996 to 2010. „International Communication Gazette” 76(2), s. 152–176.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Schäfer M., Painter J. (2021): Climate journalism in a changing media ecosystem: Assessing the production of climate change-related news around the world. „WIREs Climate Change” 12.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Schmidt A., Ivanova A., Schäfer M.S. (2013): Media attention for climate change around the world: A comparative analysis of newspaper coverage in 27 countries. „Global Environmental Change” 23(5), s. 1233–1248.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Song Y., Huang Z., Schuldt J.P., Yuan Y.C. (2022): National prisms of a global phenomenon: A comparative study of press coverage of climate change in the US, UK, and China. „Journalism” 23(10), s. 2208–2229.
Crossref   Google Scholar

Steciąg M. (2012): Dyskurs ekologiczny w debacie publicznej. Zielona Góra.   Google Scholar

Wodak R. (2001): The discourse historical approach. [W:] Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Red. R. Wodak, M. Meyer. London, s. 63–94.
Crossref   Google Scholar