On some special features of the examining of evidence by jury (based on educational trial)
Stanisław Jałyszew
North-West Branch of the Russian State University of Justice (St. Petersburg)https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1624-2675
Elena Topilskaya
North-West Branch of the Russian State University of Justice (St. Petersburg)https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5137-3582
Abstract
On the example of the reconstruction of a real criminal case, students of law universities tried to understand the psychology of jurors taking the verdict on the case. It turned out that the opinion of a professional judge is signifcantly different from that of the jury. This concerned both the defendant’s guilt and the proof of individual facts.
Keywords:
court, consideration of criminal cases, jury trial, verdict, training of lawyers, conducting training sessionsReferences
Дементьев С.И. Построение уголовно – правовых санкций в виде лишения свободы, Ростов н/Д 1986. Google Scholar
Судебное красноречие русских юристов прошлого, Сост. Ю.А. Костанов. М., 1992. Google Scholar
Баев М.О., Баев О.Я., Роль суда в уголовно-процессуальном исследовании преступлений на этапе судебного следствия /Воронежские криминалистические чтения. Сборник научных трудов. Вып.10. – Изд-во Воронежского гос. ун-та 2008. Google Scholar
Стабров Н.И. Рассмотрение ходатайств о недопустимости доказательств в Российской Федерации в суде присяжных, “Журнал российского права”, 2006, № 11. Google Scholar
Петрухин И.Л. Оправдательный приговор и право на реабилитацию: монография, “Проспект” 2009. Google Scholar
North-West Branch of the Russian State University of Justice (St. Petersburg)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1624-2675
North-West Branch of the Russian State University of Justice (St. Petersburg)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5137-3582
