Феноменология на службе языкознания. Принцип симультан-ности
Vasili Siankevich
Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny, SiedlceAbstrakt
In the humanitarian field, conventional institutions and existing institutes of knowledge give place to the paradoxical experience of knowing the obvious reality by means of art. This non-discursive experience does not have access to the sphere of linguistic forms and paradigms; however, it receives a logistic embodiment in the word that can be heard in real time. It is the task of phenomenological linguistics to learn the motives and reflexes of the invaluable experience of a person’s meeting with the true reality embodied in the living word. The article addresses the issue of the orthodox inconsistency of traditional
linguistics in understanding linguistic essences. Phenomenology paves the way for an antinomical study of the language, supplementing the existing paradigms of analysis with its characteristic principles. In the light of the principle of simultaneity, the meaning of derivations characteristic of linguistic creativity becomes accessible, not excluding
mythology.
Słowa kluczowe:
phenomenology, phenomenological linguistics, logistics, opinion, simultaneityBibliografia
Èrn Vladimir. 2000. Borʹba za Logos. G. Skovoroda. Žiznʹ i učenie [Struggle for the Logos. G. Skovoroda. Life and Teaching]. Minsk, Harvest, Moscow, AST. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Florenskij Pavel. 2017. U vodorazelov mysli [The watersheds have thoughts]. Vol 2. Moscow, Akademičeskij proekt. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Foerster Heinz von. 1972. Notes on an epistemology for living things. BCL Report No. 9.3 (BCL Fiche no 104/1). Biological Computer Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana. (In English) Google Scholar
Fromm Èrih. 2004. Imetʹ ili bytʹ? Radi lûbvi k žizni [To have or to be? For the love of life]. Per. s ang. Predislovie Gurevič P.S. Moscow, Ajris-press. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Glasersfeld Ernst von. 1995. Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London, Falmer Press. (In English) Google Scholar
Gruzberg Lûdmila Aleksandrovna. 2002. Antinomiâ ne estʹ antonomiâ [Antinomy is not antonomy]. In: Problemy socio-i psiholingvistiki. Vyp. 1. Permian, Izdatelʹstvo Permskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, pp. 7–10. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Gusserlʹ Edmund. 2011. Logičeskie issledovaniâ [Logical research]. T. 1: Prolegomeny k čistoj logike. Per. s nem. Bernštejn È.A. Ed. Frank S.L. Moscow, Akademičeskij proekt. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Hernas Adam. 2017. Od zawsze jesteś przy mnie. Zarys filozofii bliskiego. Cracow, Instytut Myśli J. Tischnera. (In Polish) Google Scholar
Homskij Noam, Bervik Robert. 2021. Čelovek govorâŝij. Èvolûciâ i âzyk [Talking person. Evolution and language]. Sankt-Peterburg, Piter. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Kaliteevskaâ Elena. 2007. Fenomenologiâ blizosti. “Geštalʹt” [Phenomenology of proximity.“Gestalt”]. Available at: http://www.gestalt.ru/ (Accessed 12 February 2020). (In Russian) Google Scholar
Karmanova Zoâ Âkovlevna. 2014. Fenomenologičeskie aspekty soderžatelʹnoj struktury slova [Phenomenological aspects of the content structure of the word]. Kaluga, Èjdos. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Kohan Valʹter. 2014. Estʹ li mesto filosofii v deâtelʹnosti učitelâ [Is there a place for philosophy in the activities of a teacher]. In: Učitelʹnaedine s soboj. Ed. Koževnikova M.N. St. Petersburg, Lema, pp. 10–16. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Košelev Aleksej Dmitrievič. 2013. Sovremennaâ teoretičeskaâ lingvistika kak vavilonskaâ bašnâ (o “mirnom” sosuŝestvovanii množestva nesovmestimyh teorij âzyka) [Modern theoretical linguistics as the Tower of Babel (about the “peaceful” coexistence of many incompatible theories of language). “Izvestiâ RAN. Seriâ literatury i âzyka” no. 72/6, pp. 3–22. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Kravčenko Aleksandr Vladimirovič. 2001. Kognitivnaâ lingvistika i novaâ èpistemologiâ (k voprosu ob idealʹnom proekte âzykoznaniâ [Cognitive linguistics and new epistemology (on the question of the ideal project of linguistics]. “Izvestiâ AN. Seriâ literatury i âzyka” no. 60/5, pp. 3–13. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Kravčenko Aleksandr Vladimirovič. 2015. Âvlâetsâ li tradicionnyj lingvističeskij analiz analizom âzyka? [Is traditional linguistic analysis an analysis of language?]. “Vestnik Tvgu. Seriâ Filologiâ” no. 2, pp. 54–62. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Losev Aleksej Fedorovič. 1993. Bytie. Imâ. Kosmos [Being. Name. Space]. Moscow, Myslʹ. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Lotman Ûrij Mihajlovič. 1979. Bytovoe povedenie i tipologiâ kulʹtury v Rossii XVIII v. [Everyday behavior and typology of culture in Russia in the eighteenth century]. In: Kulʹturnoe nasledie Drevnej Rusi (Istoki. Stanovlenie. Tradicii). Leningrad, Izdatelʹstvo Puškinskogo Doma, pp. 292–297. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Senkevič Vasilij Ivanovič. 2020. Fenomenologičeskaâ lingvistika. Ètičeskie načala i principy âzyka [Phenomenological linguistics. Ethical principles and principles of language]. Siedlce, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczo-Humanistycznego w Siedlcach. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Suchanek Lucjan. 2020. O polʹze fenomenologii v èmigrantologičeskih issledovaniâh. “Acta Polono-Ruthenica” Vol. XXV/1, pp. 11–20. (In Russian)
Crossref
Google Scholar
Vyšeslavcev Boris Petrovič. 1994. Ètika preobražennogo èrosa [Ethics of the transformed eros]. Moscow, Respublika. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny, Siedlce
