INTEGRATION OF MOOC PRINCIPLES INTO A LANGUAGE COURSE FRAMEWORK FOR NATO DEEP: A CASE STUDY

Marcin Jóźwiak

doi:10.31648/cetl.2921

Publié le: 2018-12-311

Vol. 20 No 4 (2018)

INTEGRATION OF MOOC PRINCIPLES INTO A LANGUAGE COURSE FRAMEWORK FOR NATO DEEP: A CASE STUDY

Marcin Jóźwiak

Civitas et Lex

Rubrique: Sciences de la sécurité

https://doi.org/10.31648/cetl.2921

Résumé

The presented framework is fluid in terms of design; it can be applied to
both: suit needs of a different target group and subject. However, this paper
focuses solely on language learning and should be applied to provide training
only in this dimension.
The e-learning platform used in this project is LMS ILIAS; however, it would
be possible to apply another system of this class (learning management system).
Nonetheless, it is advisable to use LMS ILIAS, as it suits this project’s needs
and is compliant with the NATO DEEP Portal project.
Ideally, the people involved in this project should know the specifics of working
with military personnel of various countries. Additionally, all the role-holders
are required to have experience with e-learning project design based on the
ADDIE model of instructional design.
The author recommends launching the project with a pilot phase first,
so the initial assumptions would be properly revised.

Télécharger des fichiers

PDF (Język Polski)

Règles de citation

Jóźwiak, M. (2018). INTEGRATION OF MOOC PRINCIPLES INTO A LANGUAGE COURSE FRAMEWORK FOR NATO DEEP: A CASE STUDY. Civitas Et Lex, 20(4), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.31648/cetl.2921

##plugins.themes.libcom.share##

Références

1. NATO, Defence Education Enhancement Programme Handbook [b.r.m.w], p. 13.
2. NATO, NATO eLearning Concept, Jan 28, 2014, <https://www.act.nato.int/images/stories/ structure/jft/NATO_e-Learning_Concept_Jan_2014.pdf, p. 3>, access: 08.10.2018.
3. NATO Standardization Office (NSO), Language Proficiency Levels Edition A. May 2016, <https://www.natobilc.org/files/ATrainP-5%20EDA%20V2%20E.pdf, p. 1>, access: 08.10.2018.
4. Bezehovski, Zlatko. Subitcha Poorani. The Evolution of E-Learning and New Trends. Infor¬mation and Knowledge Management. Vol.6, No.3, 2016. p. 52.
5. Fischer, Helge. Linda Heise. Matthias Heinz. Kathrin Moebius, and Thomas Koehler. E-learning trends and hypes in academic teaching. Methodology and findings of a trend study. International Conference e-Learning 2014. p. 64,
6. <https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED557279.pdf>, access: 08.10.2018.
7. Witthaus, Gabi (et al.). Validation of Non-formal MOOC-based Learning. An Analysis of Assesment and Recognition Practices in Europe. JRC Science for Policy Report, 2016. p. 10,
8. <http:// publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC96968/lfna27660enn.pdf>, access: 08.10.2018.
9. Drake, J. R., O’Hara, M., Seeman, E. Five principles for MOOC design: With a case study. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 2015, p. 125−143,
10. <http:// www.jite.org/documents/Vol14/JITEv14IIPp125-143Drake0888.pdf>, access 08.10.2018.
11. Shelton, K., & Saltsman, G. (2006). Using the ADDIE model for teaching online. Interna¬tional Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 2(3), p. 14−26
12. Lawrence Cheung. Using the ADDIE Model of Instructional Design to Teach Chest Radiograph Interpretation. Journal of Biomedical Education, vol. 2016, 2016. p. https://doi. org/10.1155/2016/9502572. 2, p. 2.
13. D. Drljača, B. Latinović, Stanković, D. Cvetković. ADDIE Model for Development of E-Courses. Sinteza 2017 − International Scientific Conference on Information Technology and Data Related Research, Belgrade, Singidunum University, Serbia, 2017, pp. 242−247,
14. <http://portal.sinteza. singidunum.ac.rs/Media/files/2017/242-247.pdf>, access: 08.10.2018. Google Scholar